13.07.2015 Views

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PDES: SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND OTHER METHODSconditions in the new variables are homogeneous although the equation itself isgenerally inhomogeneous. In this section, however, we extend the use of Green’sfunctions to problems with inhomogeneous boundary conditions (<strong>and</strong> equations).This provides a more consistent <strong>and</strong> intuitive approach to the solution of suchboundary-value problems.For definiteness we shall consider Poisson’s equation∇ 2 u(r) =ρ(r), (21.80)but the material of this section may be extended to other linear PDEs of the <strong>for</strong>m(21.76). Clearly, Poisson’s equation reduces to Laplace’s equation <strong>for</strong> ρ(r) =0<strong>and</strong>so our discussion is equally applicable to this case.We wish to solve (21.80) in some region V bounded by a surface S, which mayconsist of several disconnected parts. As stated above, we shall allow the possibilitythat the boundary conditions on the solution u(r) may be inhomogeneous on S,although as we shall see this method reduces to those discussed above in thespecial case that the boundary conditions are in fact homogeneous.The two common types of inhomogeneous boundary condition <strong>for</strong> Poisson’sequation are (as discussed in subsection 20.6.2):(i) Dirichlet conditions, in which u(r) is specified on S, <strong>and</strong>(ii) Neumann conditions, in which ∂u/∂n is specified on S.In general, specifying both Dirichlet <strong>and</strong> Neumann conditions on S overdeterminesthe problem <strong>and</strong> leads to there being no solution.The specification of the surface S requires some further comment, since Smay have several disconnected parts. If we wish to solve Poisson’s equationinside some closed surface S then the situation is straight<strong>for</strong>ward <strong>and</strong> is shownin figure 21.11(a). If, however, we wish to solve Poisson’s equation in the gapbetween two closed surfaces (<strong>for</strong> example in the gap between two concentricconducting cylinders) then the volume V is bounded by a surface S that hastwo disconnected parts S 1 <strong>and</strong> S 2 , as shown in figure 21.11(b); the direction ofthe normal to the surface is always taken as pointing out of the volume V .Asimilar situation arises when we wish to solve Poisson’s equation outside someclosed surface S 1 . In this case the volume V is infinite but is treated <strong>for</strong>mallyby taking the surface S 2 as a large sphere of radius R <strong>and</strong> letting R tend toinfinity.In order to solve (21.80) subject to either Dirichlet or Neumann boundaryconditions on S, we will remind ourselves of Green’s second theorem, equation(11.20), which states that, <strong>for</strong> two scalar functions φ(r) <strong>and</strong>ψ(r) defined in somevolume V bounded by a surface S,∫∫(φ∇ 2 ψ − ψ∇ 2 φ) dV = (φ∇ψ − ψ∇φ) · ˆn dS, (21.81)V754S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!