13.07.2015 Views

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.1 LINE INTEGRALSA similar procedure may be followed <strong>for</strong> the third type of line integral in (11.1),which involves a cross product.Line integrals have properties that are analogous to those of ordinary integrals.In particular, the following are useful properties (which we illustrate using thesecond <strong>for</strong>m of line integral in (11.1) but which are valid <strong>for</strong> all three types).(i) Reversing the path of integration changes the sign of the integral. If thepath C along which the line integrals are evaluated has A <strong>and</strong> B as itsend-points then∫ BAa · dr = −∫ ABa · dr.This implies that if the path C is a loop then integrating around the loopin the opposite direction changes the sign of the integral.(ii) If the path of integration is subdivided into smaller segments then the sumof the separate line integrals along each segment is equal to the line integralalong the whole path. So, if P is any point on the path of integration thatlies between the path’s end-points A <strong>and</strong> B then∫ BAa · dr =∫ PAa · dr +∫ BPa · dr.◮Evaluate the line integral I = ∫ a · dr, wherea =(x + y)i +(y − x)j, along each of theCpaths in the xy-plane shown in figure 11.1, namely(i) the parabola y 2 = x from (1, 1) to (4, 2),(ii) the curve x =2u 2 + u +1, y =1+u 2 from (1, 1) to (4, 2),(iii) the line y = 1 from (1, 1) to (4, 1), followed by the line x = 4 from (4, 1)to (4, 2).Since each of the paths lies entirely in the xy-plane, we have dr = dx i + dy j. Wecanthere<strong>for</strong>e write the line integral as∫ ∫I = a · dr = [(x + y) dx +(y − x) dy]. (11.3)CCWe must now evaluate this line integral along each of the prescribed paths.Case (i). Along the parabola y 2 = x we have 2ydy = dx. Substituting <strong>for</strong> x in (11.3)<strong>and</strong> using just the limits on y, weobtainI =∫ (4,2)(1,1)[(x + y) dx +(y − x) dy] =∫ 21[(y 2 + y)2y +(y − y 2 )] dy =11 1 3 .Note that we could just as easily have substituted <strong>for</strong> y <strong>and</strong> obtained an integral in x,which would have given the same result.Case (ii). The second path is given in terms of a parameter u. We could eliminate ubetween the two equations to obtain a relationship between x <strong>and</strong> y directly <strong>and</strong> proceedas above, but it is usually quicker to write the line integral in terms of the parameter u.Along the curve x =2u 2 + u +1, y =1+u 2 we have dx =(4u +1)du <strong>and</strong> dy =2udu.379

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!