26.08.2015 Views

Agenda and Papers - University of Edinburgh

Agenda and Papers - University of Edinburgh

Agenda and Papers - University of Edinburgh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Edinburgh</strong><br />

Guidance for Student Support Services<br />

Quality Assurance Framework<br />

(web link to flowcharts)<br />

1. Purpose<br />

The Student Support Services Quality Assurance Framework (SSSQAF) assures the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the student experience in regard to Student Support Services by:<br />

• Supporting reflection on the strategic <strong>and</strong> operational role <strong>of</strong> support<br />

services in relation to their impact on the student experience;<br />

• Supporting reflection on the ways in which Student Support Services<br />

engage with students <strong>and</strong> other stakeholders to monitor <strong>and</strong> improve the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> services;<br />

• Supporting reflection on the ways in which the Student Support Services<br />

promote high quality learning <strong>and</strong> continuous quality enhancement;<br />

• Taking account <strong>of</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Statutory <strong>and</strong><br />

Regulatory bodies (PSRBs), where appropriate;<br />

• Providing a forum for the sharing <strong>and</strong> dissemination <strong>of</strong> good practice.<br />

2. Overview <strong>of</strong> Process<br />

The SSSQAF consists <strong>of</strong> three key elements:<br />

1. Annual monitoring<br />

All Student Support Services that fall under the SSSQAF submit an Annual<br />

Quality Assurance (QA) Report, using a st<strong>and</strong>ard template, to the Quality<br />

Assurance Committee (QAC) Sub-committee on an annual basis. The Annual<br />

(QA) Report is a self-evaluation document, but will draw on evidence including<br />

feedback from students.<br />

Student Support Services which are accredited by Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Statutory <strong>and</strong><br />

Regulatory bodies will submit their Accreditation Reports to the Sub-committee<br />

along with their Annual (QA) Reports.<br />

2. Periodic Enhanced Review<br />

In addition, some key front-facing Student Support Services are subject to a<br />

periodic review process. In developing the periodic review element we have<br />

taken account <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the Student Support Service on the student<br />

learning experience <strong>and</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> external accreditation already carried out;<br />

the aim is to keep the review proportional to the impact <strong>of</strong> the support service.<br />

Four monitoring <strong>and</strong> review combinations are possible:<br />

3. Thematic review<br />

A third method <strong>of</strong> review is the Thematic Review, whereby key interests <strong>and</strong><br />

issues are reviewed in more depth across clusters <strong>of</strong> Student Support Services.<br />

3 Different categories <strong>of</strong> review (web link to flowcharts)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!