Agenda and Papers - University of Edinburgh

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• The Sub-committee will report on an annual basis to the Quality Assurance Committee the outcomes from monitoring and review processes. Composition • The University Secretary • Convener: The Convener of QAC or her delegate • Vice-Convener: one of the Associate Deans for Quality or the Director of Quality Assurance CMVM (whomever is not the Vice-Convener of QAC) • Associate Deans for Quality Assurance CHSS, CSE and Director of Quality Assurance CMVM • EUSA nominee • Heads of Student Support Services (and/or their representatives) submitting reports • External member from a Student Support Service within the higher education sector • Academic Policy Officer, Academic Services Ms Vivienne McFarlane 4 May 2011 5
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11 6 P The University of Edinburgh Senatus Quality Assurance Committee Electronic Business 25 May 2011 Internal subject review: common core elements for Teaching Programme Review & Postgraduate Programme Review Brief description of the paper, including a statement of relevance to the University's strategic plans and priorities The paper sets out common core elements of the Teaching Programme Review and Postgraduate Programme Review and proposes specific responsibility for administration of aspects of Postgraduate Programme Review between the University Quality Unit and the College Office. The paper is relevant to the University’s Strategic Goal of “excellence in learning and teaching”. Action requested For approval. Resource implications Does the paper have resource implications? The majority of the proposals involve common process milestones and documentation, which are resource-neutral. Where additional meetings have been introduced they will be absorbed by existing resource, both in Academic Services and College Offices. Risk Assessment Does the paper include a risk analysis? Lack of consistency in review processes is a reputational risk. Equality and Diversity Does the paper have equality and diversity implications? A consistent University framework for reviews will allow more effective identification of issues with equality and diversity implications. Originator of the paper Dr Linda Bruce, Academic Policy Manager, Registry Academic Services 12 May 2011 Freedom of information Can this paper be included in open business? Yes. 1
Page 1 and 2:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 Senatus Qu
Page 3 and 4:
2. Matters arising from the Minutes
Page 5 and 6:
It was identified that it would be
Page 7 and 8:
The Committee noted with interest t
Page 9 and 10:
appropriately and with a good level
Page 11 and 12:
The Committee welcomed the proposed
Page 13 and 14:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 15 and 16:
University of Edinburgh Disability
Page 17 and 18:
1. Enhancing our Student Experience
Page 19 and 20:
• The third Disability Equality S
Page 21 and 22:
1.2. Users of the Service: Student
Page 23 and 24:
Table 5: Breakdown of Disabled Stud
Page 25 and 26:
• The main areas of support ident
Page 27 and 28:
1.4. Service Accessibility The loca
Page 29 and 30:
Case study - the Challenge of Suppo
Page 31 and 32:
APPENDIX B: Internal and External R
Page 33 and 34:
Aims and actions 3. Maintain infras
Page 35 and 36:
2. Ensure that all disabled student
Page 37 and 38:
Our Vision: Challenging attitudes.
Page 40 and 41:
!" # $ ! % &
Page 42 and 43:
4 '"" ' '" " & 5 '6 '4" '
Page 44 and 45:
& 7 7 7 19'7'&&"7 : 7 "
Page 46 and 47:
()( * G "35326 32 : > 3&7
Page 48 and 49:
' " " & / 0
Page 50 and 51:
' - 0 • ' ' 7 !7
Page 52 and 53:
6 4 1 ' 1" & J 3
Page 54 and 55:
7 * 1 J' ' & %# 36'"&"= '3
Page 56:
& " &"&= 0 " <
Page 59 and 60:
1 ' 7 0 %##"
Page 61 and 62:
• / &0 • 7&0 &0, • 0
Page 63 and 64:
8& & / • 2"%## 202 0"' 2
Page 65 and 66:
# # ! ' + ) 1 0'
Page 67 and 68:
&0 I 1" ' " 7 ' 97 1 7"'&0
Page 69 and 70:
, 4J' 4 7>JJ>@ M 7!>: ? ?2 AD3 #
Page 71 and 72:
8 * ( * $ 2 ::/5 ! 8
Page 73 and 74:
• 17' 7/ • 3&02"& %## ' '
Page 75 and 76:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 77 and 78:
6. CSE Pleasance boasts an incredib
Page 79 and 80:
c. Develop a new cSE Operating Plan
Page 81 and 82:
16. Thus, the cSE’s commitment to
Page 83 and 84:
Taking Account of all users 20. cSE
Page 85 and 86:
30. Finally, cSE staff are also act
Page 87 and 88:
The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 89 and 90:
If you require this document in an
Page 91 and 92:
The Report of the Senatus Quality A
Page 93 and 94:
Task Group identified examples of g
Page 95 and 96:
should be identified and asked to r
Page 97 and 98:
• Consider whether or not Collabo
Page 99 and 100:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 101 and 102:
The Teachability Task Group was pro
Page 103 and 104:
3. Accessible learning - key areas
Page 105 and 106:
• ensuring that studio-based prac
Page 107 and 108:
Appendices Appendix 1 - QAA Precept
Page 109 and 110:
4. Institutions operate systems to
Page 111 and 112: Academic assessment 12. Academic as
Page 113 and 114: study, learn, live and take part in
Page 115 and 116: • Consider the international dime
Page 117 and 118: Appendix 4 Senatus Teachability Tas
Page 119 and 120: 3. Remit for the CoA post 3.1 Purpo
Page 121 and 122: Appendix 5 Teachability Task Group
Page 123 and 124: Information for staff • Where can
Page 125 and 126: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 127 and 128: University academic staff 2. Qualit
Page 129 and 130: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 131 and 132: 4. “Placeholder task group” The
Page 133 and 134: Senate Quality Assurance Committee
Page 135 and 136: flexibility will support ECA’s st
Page 137 and 138: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Page 139 and 140: the student experience. The worksho
Page 141 and 142: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.5.11 QAC 10/11 6
Page 143 and 144: DRAFT The University of Edinburgh G
Page 145 and 146: decides that the Accreditation Repo
Page 147 and 148: 3.4 Thematic Reviews (web link to f
Page 149 and 150: • Heads of Student Support Servic
Page 151 and 152: DRAFT Student Support Service Annua
Page 153 and 154: Appendices Templates Annual Quality
Page 155 and 156: The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 157 and 158: Studies, with the former dealing wi
Page 159 and 160: The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 161: The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 165 and 166: Senate Quality Assurance Committee
Page 167 and 168: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
show all

Agenda and Papers - University of Edinburgh

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?