- Page 1 and 2:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 Senatus Qu
- Page 3 and 4:
2. Matters arising from the Minutes
- Page 5 and 6:
It was identified that it would be
- Page 7 and 8:
The Committee noted with interest t
- Page 9 and 10:
appropriately and with a good level
- Page 11 and 12:
The Committee welcomed the proposed
- Page 13 and 14:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 15 and 16: University of Edinburgh Disability
- Page 17 and 18: 1. Enhancing our Student Experience
- Page 19 and 20: • The third Disability Equality S
- Page 21 and 22: 1.2. Users of the Service: Student
- Page 23 and 24: Table 5: Breakdown of Disabled Stud
- Page 25 and 26: • The main areas of support ident
- Page 27 and 28: 1.4. Service Accessibility The loca
- Page 29 and 30: Case study - the Challenge of Suppo
- Page 31 and 32: APPENDIX B: Internal and External R
- Page 33 and 34: Aims and actions 3. Maintain infras
- Page 35 and 36: 2. Ensure that all disabled student
- Page 37 and 38: Our Vision: Challenging attitudes.
- Page 40 and 41: !" # $ ! % &
- Page 42 and 43: 4 '"" ' '" " & 5 '6 '4" '
- Page 44 and 45: & 7 7 7 19'7'&&"7 : 7 "
- Page 46 and 47: ()( * G "35326 32 : > 3&7
- Page 48 and 49: ' " " & / 0
- Page 50 and 51: ' - 0 • ' ' 7 !7
- Page 52 and 53: 6 4 1 ' 1" & J 3
- Page 54 and 55: 7 * 1 J' ' & %# 36'"&"= '3
- Page 56: & " &"&= 0 " <
- Page 59 and 60: 1 ' 7 0 %##"
- Page 61 and 62: • / &0 • 7&0 &0, • 0
- Page 63 and 64: 8& & / • 2"%## 202 0"' 2
- Page 65: # # ! ' + ) 1 0'
- Page 69 and 70: , 4J' 4 7>JJ>@ M 7!>: ? ?2 AD3 #
- Page 71 and 72: 8 * ( * $ 2 ::/5 ! 8
- Page 73 and 74: • 17' 7/ • 3&02"& %## ' '
- Page 75 and 76: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 77 and 78: 6. CSE Pleasance boasts an incredib
- Page 79 and 80: c. Develop a new cSE Operating Plan
- Page 81 and 82: 16. Thus, the cSE’s commitment to
- Page 83 and 84: Taking Account of all users 20. cSE
- Page 85 and 86: 30. Finally, cSE staff are also act
- Page 87 and 88: The University of Edinburgh Senate
- Page 89 and 90: If you require this document in an
- Page 91 and 92: The Report of the Senatus Quality A
- Page 93 and 94: Task Group identified examples of g
- Page 95 and 96: should be identified and asked to r
- Page 97 and 98: • Consider whether or not Collabo
- Page 99 and 100: H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 101 and 102: The Teachability Task Group was pro
- Page 103 and 104: 3. Accessible learning - key areas
- Page 105 and 106: • ensuring that studio-based prac
- Page 107 and 108: Appendices Appendix 1 - QAA Precept
- Page 109 and 110: 4. Institutions operate systems to
- Page 111 and 112: Academic assessment 12. Academic as
- Page 113 and 114: study, learn, live and take part in
- Page 115 and 116: • Consider the international dime
- Page 117 and 118:
Appendix 4 Senatus Teachability Tas
- Page 119 and 120:
3. Remit for the CoA post 3.1 Purpo
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix 5 Teachability Task Group
- Page 123 and 124:
Information for staff • Where can
- Page 125 and 126:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 127 and 128:
University academic staff 2. Qualit
- Page 129 and 130:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 131 and 132:
4. “Placeholder task group” The
- Page 133 and 134:
Senate Quality Assurance Committee
- Page 135 and 136:
flexibility will support ECA’s st
- Page 137 and 138:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 139 and 140:
the student experience. The worksho
- Page 141 and 142:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.5.11 QAC 10/11 6
- Page 143 and 144:
DRAFT The University of Edinburgh G
- Page 145 and 146:
decides that the Accreditation Repo
- Page 147 and 148:
3.4 Thematic Reviews (web link to f
- Page 149 and 150:
• Heads of Student Support Servic
- Page 151 and 152:
DRAFT Student Support Service Annua
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendices Templates Annual Quality
- Page 155 and 156:
The University of Edinburgh Senate
- Page 157 and 158:
Studies, with the former dealing wi
- Page 159 and 160:
The University of Edinburgh Senate
- Page 161 and 162:
The University of Edinburgh Senate
- Page 163 and 164:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
- Page 165 and 166:
Senate Quality Assurance Committee
- Page 167 and 168:
H/02/28/02 QAC: 25.05.11 QAC 10/11
Change language