06.12.2012 Views

CSEM Scientific and Technical Report 2008

CSEM Scientific and Technical Report 2008

CSEM Scientific and Technical Report 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wireless Sensor Networks for Fire Detection <strong>and</strong> Monitoring at the Wild-urban Interface<br />

C. Kassapoglou-Faist, B. Perrin, , M. Sénéclauze<br />

<strong>CSEM</strong> had the opportunity to test its low-power wireless sensor network in real-life deployments for fire monitoring in key locations. These<br />

experiments allowed a better tuning of the network parameters <strong>and</strong> improving its deployment process. Firefighters found the tool useful.<br />

Forest fires constitute a major threat to dry-climate areas<br />

during the hot season <strong>and</strong> a considerable effort is dedicated<br />

every year to their prevention, early detection <strong>and</strong> quick<br />

suppression. Wireless sensor network technology has offered<br />

new, promising perspectives in this task. As an expert in lowpower<br />

wireless networks, <strong>CSEM</strong> had the opportunity to<br />

develop, deploy <strong>and</strong> test such a tool in real life conditions,<br />

through its participation in the EU project SCIER.<br />

The aim of the SCIER project is the realization of a sensing<br />

<strong>and</strong> computing infrastructure for environmental risks (forest<br />

fires <strong>and</strong> floods) in the wild-urban interface, i.e. in areas where<br />

wild vegetation <strong>and</strong> urban constructions meet.<br />

The sensing system was tested in real conditions, in four<br />

different situations (2 experiments <strong>and</strong> 2 deployments).<br />

• In the first wind-tunnel experiments, which took place at<br />

the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICH)<br />

in Greece, the behaviour of the temperature <strong>and</strong> relativehumidity<br />

sensors (Sensirion SHT11) was evaluated at the<br />

passage of small-scale fire fronts (Figure 1).<br />

Figure 1: Temperature <strong>and</strong> relative- humidity in a fire front<br />

• The second experiment was conducted in Gestosa (PT)<br />

<strong>and</strong> aimed at testing the different components of the<br />

system in an outdoor controlled fire (Figure 2). For the<br />

wireless sensor network, the challenges were to test <strong>and</strong><br />

validate the deployment <strong>and</strong> the robustness of the autoconfiguration<br />

to fire radio disturbance as well as gather the<br />

full real fire data (Figure 2).<br />

• The first in situ deployment has been running since July<br />

<strong>2008</strong> in the region of Stamata, North of Athens, Greece.<br />

Nineteen temperature <strong>and</strong> relative humidity sensors, one<br />

anemometer <strong>and</strong> occasionally two vision sensors [1] have<br />

been placed in a hilly area (communication-wise, covering<br />

about half of the 540x540 m 2 ), <strong>and</strong> transmit their<br />

measurements in a multi-hop way to a collection point<br />

located at the municipal building nearby. In general, the<br />

network has been operational. Fortunately for the area but<br />

unluckily for the tests carried out, no fire erupted.<br />

Nonetheless, the collected measurements have provided<br />

real-life data that contributes to refining <strong>and</strong> training the<br />

data fusion algorithms. The performance with respect to<br />

energy consumption is satisfactory: no change of the<br />

batteries has been needed. However, a few problems<br />

have been encountered. Nodes have been “lost” at times,<br />

probably due to the fact that they were deployed near limit<br />

conditions (low radio signal strength that falls below<br />

reception threshold, maybe due to a weather condition<br />

change). Setting the node activity to high rates has also<br />

tended to degrade performance with time.<br />

• The second deployment was done during autumn <strong>2008</strong> at<br />

the Aubagne (FR) periphery. After a one-day tutorial,<br />

CEREN, a regional centre for fire-fighter formation took<br />

the control of the platform. Ramps of temperature were<br />

experienced close to the sensors to check the correctness<br />

of the alarm detection. CEREN noted that the fire<br />

detection was correctly reported through the wireless<br />

sensor network during their tests.<br />

Figure 2: Wireless sensor nodes in the fire (Gestosa)<br />

The main results of the 4 tests can be summarized by the<br />

following points:<br />

• The importance <strong>and</strong> great behaviour of our wireless<br />

sensor network reconfiguration capabilities during the loss<br />

of communication<br />

• The relative ease of deployment of such a network <strong>and</strong><br />

the complexity of its optimisation<br />

• The need of an efficient link to the data fusion centre<br />

• The real need for this type of monitoring system by firefighters.<br />

The project partners are Epsilon International SA (GR),<br />

National <strong>and</strong> Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), DHI<br />

Hydroinform A.S. (CZ), National Agricultural Research<br />

Foundation (GR), <strong>CSEM</strong> (CH), Group 4 Security Services<br />

(GB), Greek Research <strong>and</strong> Technology Network (GR), Centre<br />

d'Essais et de Recherche de l'ENtente (FR), TECNOMA S.A.<br />

(ES), Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Aerodinâmica<br />

Industrial (PT).<br />

This work was partly funded by the European Union. <strong>CSEM</strong><br />

thanks them for their support.<br />

[1] P. Heim, et al., “High Dynamic Range Versatile Front-End for<br />

Vision Systems”, <strong>CSEM</strong> <strong>Scientific</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007, page 25<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!