27.10.2015 Views

What do students know and understand about the Holocaust?

What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1

What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Who were <strong>the</strong> victims?<br />

107<br />

‘structural pressures’. Put differently, policy was <strong>the</strong><br />

product of interplay between ideology <strong>and</strong> reality: it<br />

was context-bound, subject to change, <strong>and</strong> could<br />

(<strong>and</strong> often did) follow para<strong>do</strong>xical or what would<br />

appear to be nonsensical trajectories.<br />

When it comes to <strong>the</strong> victims of Nazism <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is evidently a great deal that <strong>students</strong> need to<br />

ideally ‘<strong>know</strong>’ <strong>and</strong> ‘underst<strong>and</strong>’. None of this is to<br />

say that <strong>the</strong> absence of any one of <strong>the</strong> above will<br />

inevitably result in complete ignorance – <strong>the</strong> nature of<br />

<strong>know</strong>ledge is more complex than that – but it serves<br />

to underline how gaps in <strong>know</strong>ledge, misconceptions<br />

or misunderst<strong>and</strong>ings will have ramifications.<br />

Through <strong>the</strong>ir studies <strong>students</strong> should ultimately<br />

not just <strong>know</strong> that <strong>the</strong>re were numerous victim<br />

groups, but develop <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of what happened to each group, as well as how<br />

<strong>and</strong> why <strong>the</strong>y happened. This approach can<br />

enable <strong>students</strong> to identify points of intersection<br />

<strong>and</strong> commonality; it can also empower <strong>students</strong><br />

to recognise particularity, <strong>and</strong> help <strong>the</strong>m come to<br />

appreciate that ‘<strong>the</strong>re were frayed edges to Nazi<br />

racial concepts as well as practices’ (Bloxham 2013:<br />

181). Such outcomes are <strong>the</strong> best means of ensuring<br />

not only historical accuracy, but also establishing <strong>the</strong><br />

specific phenomenological character of Nazism.<br />

Who <strong>do</strong> <strong>students</strong> identify as <strong>the</strong> victims<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?<br />

Students were asked in <strong>the</strong> survey to provide a freetext<br />

response to <strong>the</strong> question ‘Who were <strong>the</strong> victims<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?’ (question 40). Responses were<br />

coded, producing <strong>the</strong> results presented in Table 5.1.<br />

This data indicates that, while <strong>students</strong> at <strong>the</strong><br />

younger end of <strong>the</strong> age spectrum tend to identify<br />

only Jews as victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, this is<br />

increasingly reversed with age – so much so that by<br />

<strong>the</strong> age of 15/16 years old, most will include Jews<br />

<strong>and</strong> at least one o<strong>the</strong>r victim group.<br />

Such movement towards inclusive, holistic<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ings of ‘who’ was a victim of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Holocaust</strong> suggests a fundamental shift in how<br />

<strong>students</strong> come to conceive of ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>’ during<br />

<strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong>ir formal schooling. It implies that,<br />

as <strong>students</strong> get older, <strong>the</strong>y see <strong>the</strong> term less as a<br />

descriptor of something specifically or exclusively<br />

‘Jewish’, <strong>and</strong> more as a catch-all phrase for a shared<br />

or common experience. While this trend might be<br />

seen to indicate that with age <strong>students</strong> develop<br />

more complex underst<strong>and</strong>ings of victimhood, it<br />

none<strong>the</strong>less goes against <strong>the</strong> Jewish specificity of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>. Moreover, as was outlined at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning of this Chapter, a conceptual approach<br />

which collapses all victims of Nazism beneath one<br />

umbrella term <strong>and</strong> blurs <strong>the</strong> distinguishing features<br />

of each group’s experience, actually risks being<br />

counterproductive <strong>and</strong> even pernicious.<br />

It may also be tempting to attribute any correlation<br />

between age <strong>and</strong> conceptual transformation to a<br />

simple accumulation of <strong>know</strong>ledge. Although both<br />

this piece of research <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Centre’s previous<br />

investigation into teaching practices (Pettigrew et<br />

al. 2009) have shown that younger <strong>students</strong> are<br />

increasingly likely to encounter ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>’ in<br />

multiple subject settings during Years 7 <strong>and</strong> 8,<br />

it remains <strong>the</strong> case that most formal teaching <strong>and</strong><br />

learning takes place in history classrooms during<br />

Year 9. With that in mind, <strong>the</strong> transformation in how<br />

<strong>students</strong> come to think of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong> define<br />

its victims might appear to be <strong>the</strong> result of newly<br />

acquired <strong>know</strong>ledge brought through organised study.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> nature of learning <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

development of <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

far more complex than this. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> notion<br />

that <strong>students</strong> necessarily come to <strong>know</strong> more with<br />

age <strong>and</strong> to re-evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir conceptions of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong> its victims was not always evidenced.<br />

As will be demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> following sections,<br />

<strong>students</strong>’ <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong><br />

experiences of different victim groups was in fact<br />

Table 5.1 Reponses to <strong>the</strong> question ‘Who were <strong>the</strong> victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?’, by year group (%)<br />

Year 7<br />

(n=895)<br />

Year 8<br />

(n=1,038)<br />

Year 9<br />

(n=2,482)<br />

Year 10<br />

(n=1,128)<br />

Year 11<br />

(n=487)<br />

Year 12<br />

(n=544)<br />

Year 13<br />

(n=343)<br />

Total<br />

(n=6,917)<br />

Jews, Jewish people,<br />

65.5 65.7 55.2 45.6 38.7 39.5 29.4 52.9<br />

<strong>the</strong> Jewish, etc.<br />

Jews plus any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

15.8 25.4 38.2 49.9 59.0 57.5 67.3 39.7<br />

victim group<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r groups without<br />

1.8 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.2<br />

reference to <strong>the</strong> Jews<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r relevant answer 1.9 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.9 1.2<br />

Inaccurate answer 15.0 5.9 4.3 2.3 1.0 1.3 1.2 5.0<br />

www.ioe.ac.uk/holocaust

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!