What do students know and understand about the Holocaust?
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Who were <strong>the</strong> victims?<br />
107<br />
‘structural pressures’. Put differently, policy was <strong>the</strong><br />
product of interplay between ideology <strong>and</strong> reality: it<br />
was context-bound, subject to change, <strong>and</strong> could<br />
(<strong>and</strong> often did) follow para<strong>do</strong>xical or what would<br />
appear to be nonsensical trajectories.<br />
When it comes to <strong>the</strong> victims of Nazism <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is evidently a great deal that <strong>students</strong> need to<br />
ideally ‘<strong>know</strong>’ <strong>and</strong> ‘underst<strong>and</strong>’. None of this is to<br />
say that <strong>the</strong> absence of any one of <strong>the</strong> above will<br />
inevitably result in complete ignorance – <strong>the</strong> nature of<br />
<strong>know</strong>ledge is more complex than that – but it serves<br />
to underline how gaps in <strong>know</strong>ledge, misconceptions<br />
or misunderst<strong>and</strong>ings will have ramifications.<br />
Through <strong>the</strong>ir studies <strong>students</strong> should ultimately<br />
not just <strong>know</strong> that <strong>the</strong>re were numerous victim<br />
groups, but develop <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
of what happened to each group, as well as how<br />
<strong>and</strong> why <strong>the</strong>y happened. This approach can<br />
enable <strong>students</strong> to identify points of intersection<br />
<strong>and</strong> commonality; it can also empower <strong>students</strong><br />
to recognise particularity, <strong>and</strong> help <strong>the</strong>m come to<br />
appreciate that ‘<strong>the</strong>re were frayed edges to Nazi<br />
racial concepts as well as practices’ (Bloxham 2013:<br />
181). Such outcomes are <strong>the</strong> best means of ensuring<br />
not only historical accuracy, but also establishing <strong>the</strong><br />
specific phenomenological character of Nazism.<br />
Who <strong>do</strong> <strong>students</strong> identify as <strong>the</strong> victims<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?<br />
Students were asked in <strong>the</strong> survey to provide a freetext<br />
response to <strong>the</strong> question ‘Who were <strong>the</strong> victims<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?’ (question 40). Responses were<br />
coded, producing <strong>the</strong> results presented in Table 5.1.<br />
This data indicates that, while <strong>students</strong> at <strong>the</strong><br />
younger end of <strong>the</strong> age spectrum tend to identify<br />
only Jews as victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, this is<br />
increasingly reversed with age – so much so that by<br />
<strong>the</strong> age of 15/16 years old, most will include Jews<br />
<strong>and</strong> at least one o<strong>the</strong>r victim group.<br />
Such movement towards inclusive, holistic<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ings of ‘who’ was a victim of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Holocaust</strong> suggests a fundamental shift in how<br />
<strong>students</strong> come to conceive of ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>’ during<br />
<strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong>ir formal schooling. It implies that,<br />
as <strong>students</strong> get older, <strong>the</strong>y see <strong>the</strong> term less as a<br />
descriptor of something specifically or exclusively<br />
‘Jewish’, <strong>and</strong> more as a catch-all phrase for a shared<br />
or common experience. While this trend might be<br />
seen to indicate that with age <strong>students</strong> develop<br />
more complex underst<strong>and</strong>ings of victimhood, it<br />
none<strong>the</strong>less goes against <strong>the</strong> Jewish specificity of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>. Moreover, as was outlined at <strong>the</strong><br />
beginning of this Chapter, a conceptual approach<br />
which collapses all victims of Nazism beneath one<br />
umbrella term <strong>and</strong> blurs <strong>the</strong> distinguishing features<br />
of each group’s experience, actually risks being<br />
counterproductive <strong>and</strong> even pernicious.<br />
It may also be tempting to attribute any correlation<br />
between age <strong>and</strong> conceptual transformation to a<br />
simple accumulation of <strong>know</strong>ledge. Although both<br />
this piece of research <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Centre’s previous<br />
investigation into teaching practices (Pettigrew et<br />
al. 2009) have shown that younger <strong>students</strong> are<br />
increasingly likely to encounter ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>’ in<br />
multiple subject settings during Years 7 <strong>and</strong> 8,<br />
it remains <strong>the</strong> case that most formal teaching <strong>and</strong><br />
learning takes place in history classrooms during<br />
Year 9. With that in mind, <strong>the</strong> transformation in how<br />
<strong>students</strong> come to think of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong> define<br />
its victims might appear to be <strong>the</strong> result of newly<br />
acquired <strong>know</strong>ledge brought through organised study.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> nature of learning <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
development of <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />
far more complex than this. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> notion<br />
that <strong>students</strong> necessarily come to <strong>know</strong> more with<br />
age <strong>and</strong> to re-evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir conceptions of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong> its victims was not always evidenced.<br />
As will be demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> following sections,<br />
<strong>students</strong>’ <strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong><br />
experiences of different victim groups was in fact<br />
Table 5.1 Reponses to <strong>the</strong> question ‘Who were <strong>the</strong> victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>?’, by year group (%)<br />
Year 7<br />
(n=895)<br />
Year 8<br />
(n=1,038)<br />
Year 9<br />
(n=2,482)<br />
Year 10<br />
(n=1,128)<br />
Year 11<br />
(n=487)<br />
Year 12<br />
(n=544)<br />
Year 13<br />
(n=343)<br />
Total<br />
(n=6,917)<br />
Jews, Jewish people,<br />
65.5 65.7 55.2 45.6 38.7 39.5 29.4 52.9<br />
<strong>the</strong> Jewish, etc.<br />
Jews plus any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
15.8 25.4 38.2 49.9 59.0 57.5 67.3 39.7<br />
victim group<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r groups without<br />
1.8 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.2<br />
reference to <strong>the</strong> Jews<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r relevant answer 1.9 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.9 1.2<br />
Inaccurate answer 15.0 5.9 4.3 2.3 1.0 1.3 1.2 5.0<br />
www.ioe.ac.uk/holocaust