What do students know and understand about the Holocaust?
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52<br />
Collective conceptions of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />
Figure 3.8 Most commonly used words <strong>and</strong> phrases which refer to <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> across all<br />
6,094 student descriptions.<br />
itself would suggest that <strong>the</strong> number has at least<br />
some traction within <strong>the</strong>ir collective conceptions<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>. Although not captured in <strong>the</strong><br />
summary offered by Figure 3.8, a number between<br />
10 <strong>and</strong> 12 million was also cited on 15 different<br />
occasions. Here, <strong>students</strong> provided <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />
explanation that this referred to <strong>the</strong> total number<br />
of deaths if non-Jewish victims were included<br />
within <strong>the</strong> count.<br />
However, by <strong>the</strong>ir own volition, <strong>students</strong> most<br />
commonly framed <strong>the</strong> question of scale with ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
less precision through reference to ‘millions’ of<br />
people being killed. A smaller, but still significant<br />
minority of <strong>students</strong> spoke in terms of ‘thous<strong>and</strong>s’,<br />
‘many thous<strong>and</strong>s’, ‘thous<strong>and</strong>s upon thous<strong>and</strong>s’ or<br />
‘hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s’ of murders, while a h<strong>and</strong>ful<br />
placed <strong>the</strong> figure in ‘billions’ instead.<br />
Before this finding is interpreted too readily as<br />
clear ‘evidence’ of <strong>students</strong>’ underestimation of <strong>the</strong><br />
scale of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, closer examination of <strong>the</strong><br />
actual words <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>the</strong>y provide<br />
for any specific numbers given suggests that it is also<br />
important to consider <strong>the</strong> <strong>students</strong>’ numerical literacy<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir conceptualisation of magnitude through<br />
large numbers more generally.<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r framed in terms of thous<strong>and</strong>s, hundreds<br />
of thous<strong>and</strong>s, millions or even billions, almost all<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>students</strong> surveyed appeared to want to<br />
emphasise what <strong>the</strong>y conceived of as <strong>the</strong> enormity of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>. And so, for example, while one Year<br />
8 student included a speculative figure of ’10,000s’<br />
of deaths, <strong>the</strong>y added that this was a figure that was<br />
‘more than people can count’. Some characterised<br />
it as a ‘huge’ campaign or ‘mass genocide’ while<br />
referencing thous<strong>and</strong>s or hundreds ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
millions of lives lost. Many o<strong>the</strong>rs avoided <strong>the</strong> use<br />
of numbers entirely but emphasised enormity in<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r ways: some said that ‘a massive percentage<br />
of Jews in <strong>the</strong> world’ or ‘nearly every Jew’ was<br />
murdered (extracts from Year 11 <strong>and</strong> Year 10 student<br />
responses); <strong>the</strong> prefix ‘mass’ was employed on well<br />
over 700 occasions while o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>students</strong> simply<br />
asserted that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> itself was ‘a huge event’.<br />
Timeframe<br />
In <strong>the</strong>ir short descriptions, only around one in four<br />
<strong>students</strong> made mention of any kind of temporal<br />
framework for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong>, as is illustrated in<br />
Figure 3.9, <strong>the</strong> Second World War was overwhelmingly<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>do</strong>minant point of reference here. Among<br />
<strong>the</strong> much smaller number of <strong>students</strong> who chose<br />
to offer a more precise timeframe, most considered<br />
that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> began at some point between<br />
1933 (20 references) <strong>and</strong> 1942 (17 references). They<br />
were in clearer agreement that it ended in 1945<br />
(61 references). O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>students</strong> made less specific<br />
associations with <strong>the</strong> 1930s (30 references) <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
1940s (64 references), while some simply located <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Holocaust</strong> as ‘an event’ in history (13 references).<br />
In a h<strong>and</strong>ful of <strong>students</strong>’ accounts, <strong>the</strong> sense that<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> was historically located was used<br />
to highlight a disconnection with <strong>the</strong> present, for<br />
example where one Year 8 student said that ‘[<strong>the</strong>]<br />
<strong>Holocaust</strong> means that people where mean <strong>and</strong> racist<br />
in <strong>the</strong> old days’, or where a Year 13 student outlined<br />
something of Hitler’s racial ideology but countered,<br />
‘however in modern days we <strong>know</strong> this to be untrue’.<br />
In o<strong>the</strong>r student descriptions provided in response<br />
to survey question 30, continuity with <strong>the</strong> past was<br />
emphasised in various ways: