27.10.2015 Views

What do students know and understand about the Holocaust?

What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1

What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

Metho<strong>do</strong>logy<br />

How were <strong>the</strong> focus-group data<br />

analysed?<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Holocaust</strong><br />

For <strong>the</strong> focus groups concerned with <strong>know</strong>ledge,<br />

<strong>the</strong> four key questions were used as a framework<br />

for analysis, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> transcripts were read to identify<br />

all instances of <strong>the</strong> <strong>students</strong> discussing each of <strong>the</strong><br />

questions. Across all transcripts (<strong>and</strong>, thus, across all<br />

year groups), sections of relevant text were extracted<br />

<strong>and</strong> organised into four groups that corresponded<br />

with each question.<br />

For each question, <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> collated text<br />

was looked at to examine <strong>the</strong> different responses<br />

given by <strong>students</strong>. This included making notes on<br />

how <strong>students</strong>’ discussions were related to <strong>the</strong> survey<br />

data <strong>and</strong> creating a question-specific framework to<br />

attach <strong>the</strong> content of responses to <strong>the</strong> relevant key<br />

questions. Each transcript was coded according to<br />

this question-specific framework. For example, for<br />

<strong>the</strong> key question ‘Where did <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> happen?’<br />

transcripts were coded for <strong>students</strong>’ references to:<br />

■■<br />

where <strong>the</strong> Jews came from<br />

■■<br />

where <strong>the</strong>y were killed<br />

■■<br />

Germany, Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />

■■<br />

<strong>the</strong> camp system<br />

■■<br />

<strong>the</strong> ghettos<br />

■■<br />

Einsatzgruppen<br />

A narrative on each of <strong>the</strong>se ‘codes’ was <strong>the</strong>n<br />

produced which included discussion of any patterns<br />

in <strong>students</strong>’ responses, for instance recurring<br />

misconceptions, as well as exploring any trends<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir answers (for example, how <strong>students</strong>’<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing developed with age).<br />

Overall, this enabled us to map what <strong>students</strong><br />

said in response to each key question <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

give an account of <strong>students</strong>’ <strong>know</strong>ledge of what<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> was, who was responsible, who <strong>the</strong><br />

victims were, <strong>and</strong> when <strong>and</strong> where <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />

happened. Finally, <strong>students</strong>’ accounts were explored<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir explanations of what happened during<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, <strong>and</strong> what appeared to shape <strong>and</strong><br />

influence <strong>the</strong>se explanations.<br />

Survivor testimony; The Boy in <strong>the</strong> Striped<br />

Pyjamas; attitudes towards learning <strong>about</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />

A slightly different approach was taken to <strong>the</strong><br />

analysis of <strong>the</strong> focus groups conducted on survivor<br />

testimony, The Boy in <strong>the</strong> Striped Pyjamas, <strong>and</strong><br />

attitudes towards learning <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>. For<br />

each of <strong>the</strong>se topics, <strong>the</strong> transcripts were read <strong>and</strong><br />

reread closely for <strong>the</strong>mes that emerged in <strong>students</strong>’<br />

discussions. This included recurring <strong>the</strong>mes across<br />

<strong>the</strong> transcripts (within each focus-group topic)<br />

as well as any atypical comments that <strong>students</strong><br />

made. Emergent <strong>the</strong>mes were <strong>the</strong>n compared <strong>and</strong><br />

contrasted with <strong>the</strong> findings from <strong>the</strong> survey, as well<br />

as with relevant literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!