What do students know and understand about the Holocaust?
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
What-do-students-know-and-understand-about-the-Holocaust1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Encountering representations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />
81<br />
which asked for a short description of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>:<br />
The <strong>Holocaust</strong> was when <strong>the</strong> Nazis killed lots of<br />
Jews <strong>and</strong> people <strong>the</strong>y didn’t like. We covered it so<br />
much that it is becoming very boring to learn <strong>about</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> no [one] really pays attention to it anymore. We<br />
<strong>know</strong> it’s a serious topic but we <strong>do</strong>n’t need to learn<br />
<strong>about</strong> it 24/7.<br />
No matter how unrepresentative, this statement<br />
reminds us that despite <strong>students</strong>’ broad appetite<br />
to learn <strong>about</strong> this subject – even this dissenting<br />
student says ‘it’s a serious topic’ – <strong>students</strong>’<br />
attention <strong>and</strong> interest cannot be taken for granted.<br />
The subject still needs to be taught in an engaging<br />
<strong>and</strong> meaningful manner, especially if <strong>and</strong> when<br />
<strong>students</strong> encounter <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> at several points<br />
in <strong>the</strong>ir school career.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purposes of our study, one fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
measure of <strong>students</strong>’ attitudes towards learning<br />
<strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> was devised. As described in<br />
Chapter 2, <strong>the</strong> survey included 11 questions inviting<br />
<strong>students</strong> to indicate <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>y agreed<br />
or disagreed with a series of statements such as,<br />
‘The <strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>do</strong>es not really interest me’ <strong>and</strong><br />
‘The <strong>Holocaust</strong> is not related to my life because<br />
it happened so long ago’. Students’ responses<br />
to all 11 statements were combined to create a<br />
single mean figure, as an indication of <strong>the</strong>ir overall<br />
disposition towards engagement with this history<br />
(for explanation of <strong>the</strong> method, see p. 27) which<br />
enabled statistical comparison between different<br />
student groups. The higher <strong>the</strong> score, <strong>the</strong> more<br />
positive was a student’s attitude towards learning<br />
<strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>.<br />
Across all <strong>students</strong>, <strong>the</strong> average score on <strong>the</strong><br />
measure was 34.6 (out of 44), which appears to<br />
demonstrate very high levels of positive engagement<br />
with <strong>the</strong> history. This data was examined across a<br />
range of different criteria <strong>and</strong> groups of <strong>students</strong>,<br />
as detailed below, but only very limited variation<br />
was found – across all analyses levels of positivity<br />
remained consistently high.<br />
For example, <strong>students</strong> who had already learned<br />
<strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> in school were a little more<br />
positive <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject than those who had not,<br />
with an average score of 35.0 compared to 33.3.<br />
Girls appeared to have slightly more positive attitudes<br />
towards learning <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> than boys, but<br />
again <strong>the</strong> difference was small: an average score of<br />
35.0 for girls across all year groups compared with<br />
34.0 for boys. As a year group, Year 13 <strong>students</strong><br />
appeared collectively to hold <strong>the</strong> most positive<br />
attitudes towards learning <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, with<br />
an average score of 36.1. The ‘lowest’ measure for<br />
a single year group was <strong>the</strong> average score of 34.1<br />
for Year 9 <strong>students</strong>.<br />
Critically, in relation to <strong>the</strong> concerns expressed<br />
<strong>about</strong> Muslim <strong>students</strong>’ disposition towards learning<br />
<strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> (see above), <strong>the</strong> average<br />
score across all those survey respondents who<br />
self-identified as Muslim was 33.8, while – by point<br />
of comparison – <strong>the</strong> average score for those who<br />
identified as having ‘no religion’ was 34.2. Even this<br />
very small distinction was found to be statistically<br />
insignificant when <strong>the</strong> potential influence of o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
demographic variables such as socioeconomic class<br />
(as indicated by <strong>the</strong> number of books in <strong>students</strong>’<br />
homes) <strong>and</strong> academic ability (indicated by vocabulary<br />
scores) was taken into account.<br />
A more detailed explanation of <strong>the</strong> multiple<br />
regression procedures used to conduct this<br />
analysis is offered in Appendix 6. In summary, our<br />
research indicates that – for <strong>the</strong> <strong>students</strong> who took<br />
part in <strong>the</strong> survey – gender, academic ability <strong>and</strong><br />
socioeconomic class all appeared to have more<br />
influence upon attitudes towards learning <strong>about</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> than whe<strong>the</strong>r a student identified as<br />
Muslim or not. Again, across <strong>the</strong> board, all <strong>students</strong>,<br />
irrespective of year group, gender or religious<br />
identification articulated very positive attitudes<br />
towards learning <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>.<br />
Lest <strong>the</strong>se findings be queried as ‘unrepresentative’<br />
it is worth emphasising that <strong>the</strong> 1,016 <strong>students</strong><br />
who completed <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>and</strong> identified <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or <strong>the</strong>ir families as Muslim represent 12.8 per<br />
cent of <strong>the</strong> total cohort of 7,952 <strong>students</strong> who took<br />
part. The 2011 census figures puts <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />
of school-aged children in <strong>the</strong> United King<strong>do</strong>m who<br />
are Muslim at 8.1 per cent (Muslim Council of Britain<br />
2015). Of <strong>the</strong> survey respondents who identified<br />
as Muslim, 70.5 per cent indicated that religion<br />
was ‘very important’ to <strong>the</strong>m personally, 26.2 per<br />
cent that it was ‘quite important’ <strong>and</strong> 3.4 per cent<br />
that it was ‘not important’; 49.6 per cent identified<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir ethnicity as Asian–Pakistani, 16.2 per cent as<br />
Asian– Bangladeshi, 7.5 per cent as Asian–o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
(including Indian). Again, <strong>the</strong>se figures are broadly<br />
consistent with <strong>the</strong> 2011 census information on <strong>the</strong><br />
United King<strong>do</strong>m’s adult Muslim population.<br />
The findings reported here consequently<br />
challenge <strong>the</strong> growing <strong>and</strong> problematic national <strong>and</strong><br />
international discourse that risks positioning Muslim<br />
<strong>students</strong> as in opposition to learning <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Holocaust</strong> in schools. Five focus-group interviews<br />
with <strong>students</strong> from two different schools with a<br />
very high intake of Muslims were conducted in<br />
order to begin to examine this in fur<strong>the</strong>r depth. It is<br />
also important to emphasise that <strong>the</strong> two schools<br />
had very different approaches to teaching <strong>about</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>students</strong> who participated<br />
appeared to have markedly different levels of<br />
<strong>know</strong>ledge <strong>about</strong> this history. However, among both<br />
groups of <strong>students</strong>, discussion again revealed very<br />
www.ioe.ac.uk/holocaust