19.12.2016 Views

UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT

k0bf307feMT

k0bf307feMT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>UNESCO</strong> <strong>SCIENCE</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

Figure 5.5: Proportional allocation of federal R&D spending in the USA by discipline, 1994–2011 (%)<br />

100<br />

NIH Life science Other life sciences Psychology Physical science Environmental science Maths / Computer science<br />

Engineering Social sciences Other<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

2011<br />

2010<br />

2009<br />

2008<br />

2007<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

2004<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2000<br />

1999<br />

1998<br />

1997<br />

1996<br />

1995<br />

1994<br />

Source: American Association for the Advancement of Science<br />

NSF budget likely to remain flat<br />

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is the USA’s largest<br />

source of research grants for non-medical sciences. It funds most<br />

non-medical biological research and research in mathematics.<br />

At the time of writing in August 2015, the 2016 and 2017 NSF<br />

budgets have not yet been approved by Congress. Current<br />

estimates are that they will be flat for both years. The NSF<br />

has requested US$ 7.723 billion for 2015 in its submission to<br />

Congress, a 5% increase over the estimated budget. However,<br />

in the latest version of the America COMPETES Reauthorization<br />

Act of 2015, the House Committee on Science, Space and<br />

Technology has recommended an annual appropriation of<br />

US$ 7.597 billion for the 2016 and 2017 financial years, a mere<br />

3.6% increase (US$ 263 million) over the current budget.<br />

Although the NSF indicates an overall 23% success rate among<br />

grant applicants, some directorates have higher success rates<br />

than others. The average NSF grant runs to about US$ 172 200<br />

per year for three years on average, which includes institutional<br />

overheads. A 23% success rate is considered fairly low, although<br />

success rates for some NSF programmes have been as low as<br />

4–5% in some years.<br />

Targeted cuts in 2016 to the Geosciences Directorate of 16.2%<br />

may have unintended consequences: in addition to climate<br />

change, the Geosciences Directorate also funds public interest<br />

research that is critical to tornado, earthquake and tsunami<br />

prediction and preparedness.<br />

With the notable exception of the Departments of Defense<br />

and Energy, most government departments have much<br />

smaller research budgets than either the NIH or NSF (Figures<br />

5.4 and 5.5). The Department of Agriculture requested a US<br />

$4 billion budget increase for 2016 but only a small portion<br />

of this department’s US$ 25 billion in discretionary funds<br />

goes to research. Moreover, most of the research conducted<br />

by the Forest Service research is likely to be cut. As for the<br />

Environmental Protection Agency, it faces strong opposition<br />

from many Congressional Republicans who consider<br />

environmental regulations to be anti-business.<br />

Six million work in science and engineering<br />

The occupation of nearly six million US workers involved science<br />

or engineering in 2012. Over the period of 2005–2012, the USA<br />

had, on average, 3 979 full-time equivalent R&D researchers<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!