UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT
k0bf307feMT
k0bf307feMT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A world in search of an effective growth strategy<br />
A CLOSER LOOK AT COUNTRIES<br />
AND REGIONS<br />
More countries are covered by the <strong>UNESCO</strong> Science Report<br />
this time than ever before. This reflects the growing<br />
acceptance worldwide of STI as a driver of development. The<br />
following section summarizes the most insightful trends and<br />
developments emerging from Chapters 4 to 27.<br />
Canada (Chapter 4) has managed to dodge the worst<br />
shockwaves from the US financial crisis of 2008, thanks to<br />
a robust banking industry and strong energy and natural<br />
resource sectors, but this is now changing with the decline in<br />
global oil prices since 2014.<br />
Two important weaknesses highlighted by the <strong>UNESCO</strong><br />
Science Report 2010 persist: a tepid private-sector<br />
commitment to innovation and the lack of a strong national<br />
agenda for talent and training in scientific and engineering<br />
fields. Academic research remains relatively strong, overall,<br />
with publications outperforming the OECD average in terms<br />
of average citation rate, but Canada is slipping in higher<br />
education rankings. An additional vulnerability has emerged:<br />
a policy agenda focused almost exclusively on using science<br />
to power commerce, often to the detriment of critical ‘public<br />
good’ science, alongside the downsizing of government<br />
science agencies and departments.<br />
A recent government review has identified a possible<br />
disconnect between Canada’s strengths in science and<br />
technology, on the one hand, and industrial R&D and<br />
economic competitiveness, on the other. Although<br />
overall industrial R&D remains weak, four industries<br />
display considerable strength: aerospace products and<br />
parts manufacturing; ICTs; oil and gas extraction; and<br />
pharmaceutical manufacturing.<br />
Between 2010 and 2013, Canada’s GERD/GDP fell to its lowest<br />
level in a decade (1.63%). In parallel, the share of business<br />
funding of R&D receded from 51.2% (2006) to 46.4%. The<br />
pharmaceutical, chemical, primary and fabricated metals<br />
industries have all experienced an erosion in R&D spending.<br />
Consequently, the number of personnel employed in<br />
industrial R&D shrank by 23.5% between 2008 and 2012.<br />
Notable developments since 2010 include a renewed focus<br />
on polar research and knowledge, enhanced support for<br />
universities, growing applications of genomics through<br />
Genome Canada, a Venture Capital Action Plan (2013), a<br />
Canadian partnership with the EU’s Eureka programme and<br />
an International Education Strategy to attract more foreign<br />
students to Canada’s shores and maximize opportunities for<br />
global partnerships.<br />
In the United States of America (Chapter 5), GDP has been<br />
on the upswing since 2010. However, the recovery from the<br />
2008–2009 recession remains fragile. Despite the decline<br />
in unemployment levels, wages have stagnated. There is<br />
evidence that the economic stimulus package of 2009,<br />
formally known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment<br />
Act, may have buffered immediate job losses for those<br />
working in science and technology, since a significant portion<br />
of this stimulus package went to R&D.<br />
Since 2010, federal investment in R&D has stagnated in<br />
the wake of the recession. Despite this, industry has largely<br />
maintained its commitment to R&D, particularly in growing,<br />
high-opportunity sectors. As a result, total R&D spending has<br />
dipped only slightly and the balance of spending has shifted<br />
further towards industrial sources since 2010. GERD is now<br />
rising and the business sector’s investment in innovation<br />
appears to be accelerating.<br />
Most of the 11 agencies that conduct the bulk of federally<br />
funded R&D have seen flat R&D budgets for the past five<br />
years. The Department of Defense has even experienced a<br />
steep decline, reflecting the winding down of the intervention<br />
in Afghanistan and Iraq and the lesser need for related<br />
technologies. The decline in non-defence R&D appears to<br />
be due to a combination of decreasing federal budgets<br />
for specific research and the budget sequester instigated<br />
by Congress in 2013, which has enacted US$1 trillion in<br />
automatic cuts to the federal budget to reduce the deficit.<br />
This trend is having the greatest impact on basic research<br />
and public-interest science in such areas as life sciences,<br />
energy and climate, which happen to be priority areas<br />
for the executive branch of government. In order to take<br />
up the ‘grand challenges’ in priority areas announced by<br />
the president in 2013, the executive is fostering tripartite<br />
industry–non–profit–government partnerships. Some<br />
milestones built on this collaborative model are the BRAIN<br />
Initiative, the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership and the<br />
American Business Act on Climate Pledge that received a<br />
US$140 billion commitment from its industrial partners in<br />
2015.<br />
While business R&D has been thriving, budget restrictions<br />
have resulted in deep cuts to universities’ research budgets.<br />
Universities have responded by seeking new sources of<br />
funding from industry and relying heavily on temporary<br />
contract or adjunct workers. This is affecting the morale of<br />
both young and established scientists and inciting some<br />
to change career course or emigrate. In parallel, the rate of<br />
return migration among foreign students based in the USA<br />
is rising as levels of development in their country of origin<br />
improve.<br />
Chapter 1<br />
41