19.12.2016 Views

UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT

k0bf307feMT

k0bf307feMT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>UNESCO</strong> <strong>SCIENCE</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

n On the whole, the legislative and institutional framework<br />

for intellectual property protection is in place in the<br />

Black Sea countries but there is room for improvement,<br />

especially for countries which are not members of the<br />

World Trade Organization (WTO 8 ), both as concerns<br />

compliance with WTO’s Agreement on Trade-Related<br />

Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Sonnenburg et al.,<br />

2012) and, in the case of Turkey, a stronger commitment to<br />

fighting counterfeiting and piracy, for instance (EC, 2014).<br />

8. Georgia joined the WTO in 2000, Moldova in 2001, Armenia in 2003 and Ukraine in<br />

2008. Turkey has been a member of the Global Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (the<br />

precursor to WTO) since 1951. Neither Azerbaijan, nor Belarus is a member.<br />

Publications progressing in some countries,<br />

stagnating in others<br />

If we measure productivity in terms of articles published in<br />

international journals, we find that Belarus, Moldova and<br />

Ukraine were at about the same level in 2013 as in 2005; this<br />

should be of concern (Figure 12.6). Armenia and Turkey have<br />

made the most progress, with Armenia having almost doubled<br />

the number of articles per million inhabitants from 122 to<br />

215 over this period and Turkey’s ratio having risen from 185 to<br />

243 per million. If we combine researcher density and output<br />

per researcher, Turkey has clearly made the greatest progress;<br />

it also has higher population growth than its neighbours.<br />

Georgian scientists have not only increased their publication<br />

Figure 12.5: GERD in the Black Sea region by sector of performance, 2005 and 2013<br />

100<br />

5.8<br />

11.4<br />

6.5<br />

4.0<br />

17.0<br />

10.8<br />

26.8<br />

9.3<br />

10.4<br />

54.6<br />

42.1<br />

4.7<br />

6.2<br />

94.2<br />

88.6<br />

72.6<br />

85.5<br />

23.8<br />

72.8<br />

69.8<br />

30.2<br />

38.6<br />

80<br />

38.6<br />

73.2<br />

60<br />

65.3<br />

65.1<br />

10.4<br />

55.3<br />

40<br />

44.4<br />

11.6<br />

47.5<br />

33.8<br />

20<br />

20.9<br />

17.9<br />

19.9<br />

10.3<br />

0<br />

2005<br />

2013 2005 2013 2005 2013 2005 2005 2013 2005 2013 2005 2013<br />

Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Georgia Moldolva Turkey Ukraine<br />

Business enterprise Government Higher education<br />

Note: The data for Armenia and Georgia do not show business R&D expenditure as a separate category, since official statistics tend to use the classification system<br />

inherited from Soviet times when all industrially oriented companies belonged to the state; although some companies have since been privatized, business<br />

expenditure on R&D tends to be included in public sector expenditure to preserve a time series.<br />

Source: <strong>UNESCO</strong> Institute for Statistics, March 2015<br />

320

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!