UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT

Recommendations

Info

Figure 11.3: Scientific publication trends in EFTA countries, 2005–2014 Growth has slowed in Iceland since 2010 and remained steady in Norway and Switzerland 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Iceland 427 458 490 575 623 753 716 810 866 864 Liechtenstein 33 36 37 46 41 50 41 55 48 52 Norway 6 090 6 700 7 057 7 543 8 110 8 499 9 327 9 451 9 947 10 070 Switzerland 16 397 17 809 18 341 19 131 20 336 21 361 22 894 23 205 25 051 25 308 2 594 Publications per million inhabitants in Iceland in 2014 1 978 Norwegian publications per million inhabitants in 2014 3 102 Swiss publications per million inhabitants in 2014 Countries specialize in medical sciences, Switzerland stands out in physics Cumulative totals by field, 2008–2014 Iceland 113 120 965 144 115 269 985 93 1 258 100 399 49 34 Liechtenstein 25 47 1 67 9 105 40 Norway 1 361 413 11 378 2 810 1 130 4 659 10 143 1 570 17 382 1 042 3 937 686 824 Switzerland 2 099 2 940 32 662 13 197 2 806 10 251 11 281 3 193 43 279 735 19 368 1 251 1 010 Agriculture Astronomy Biological sciences Chemistry Computer science Engineering Geosciences Mathematics Medical sciences Other life sciences Physics Psychology Social sciences Note: The totals by field do not include unclassified publications, which are quite numerous for Switzerland (13 214), Norway (5 612) and Iceland (563). See the methodological note on p. 792. All countries surpass the OECD average by far for key indicators Average citation rate for publications 2008–2012 Share of papers among 10% most-cited 2008–2012 Share of papers with foreign co-authors, 2008–2014 Iceland 1.71 Iceland 18.3% Liechtenstein 90.7% Switzerland 1.56 Norway Liechtenstein OECD average 1.08 1.12 1.29 Switzerland 18.0% Norway Liechtenstein OECD average 11.1% 13.4% 12.3% Iceland Switzerland Norway OECD average 29.4% 77.4% 68.9% 61.3% The main partners are in Europe or the USA Main foreign partners between 2008 and 2014 (number of papers) 1st collaborator 2nd collaborator 3rd collaborator 4th collaborator 5th collaborator Iceland USA (1 514) UK (1 095) Sweden (1 078) Denmark (750) Germany (703) Liechtenstein Austria (121) Germany (107) Switzerland (100) USA (68) France (19) Norway USA (10 774) UK (8 854) Sweden (7 540) Germany (7 034) France (5 418) Switzerland Germany (34 164) USA (33 638) UK (20 732) France (19 832) Italy (15 618) Source: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science, Science Citation Index Expanded; data treatment by Science–Metrix 302
European Free Trade Association n a higher contribution to tertiary education in order to reach the level of other Nordic countries; n restoration of the pre-2008 target of raising the GERD/GDP ratio to 3% by 2016; n measures to increase Iceland’s participation in international research programmes; n the definition of long-term funding projects and the research infrastructure they call for; n strengthening competitive funding at the cost of fixed contributions; n a better use of the tax system to encourage the private sector to invest in R&D and innovation; and, lastly, n a better system for evaluating the quality of domestic research and innovation. Unfortunately, these recommendations hardly touch on the problem of fragmentation pinpointed by the Erawatch country report in 2013. Iceland counts one university for every 50 000 inhabitants! Of course, prioritizing some institutions over others is a politically difficult manoeuvre; it impinges on STI but also has regional, social and cultural dimensions. Notwithstanding this, channelling available resources to a single strong university likely to impress the international scientific community and attract students and faculty from abroad is an absolute must. This institution would then be able to take the lead in Iceland’s most promising research fields – health, information and communication technologies (ICTs), environment and energy – and perhaps develop others. The brilliant young Icelanders living abroad would be more willing to return home with their new ideas. Maybe it will take this young generation to heed the message from an independent expert group that recently reviewed Iceland’s STI system commissioned by the European Commission. If Iceland wishes to put an end to institutional fragmentation, they said, to improve co-ordination of the main players, foster co-operation and develop an efficient evaluation and quality assessment system, the way forward can be summed up in two words: pull together. LIECHTENSTEIN Innovation drives Liechtenstein’s economy Liechtenstein is a special case in many respects. It is one of Europe’s few remaining principalities, a constitutional democracy combining a parliament with a hereditary monarchy. One-third of inhabitants are foreigners, mainly Swiss, German and Austrian. Its tiny size – 37 000 inhabitants in 2013 – excludes it from most comparative S&T statistics and rankings. Its public expenditure on R&D amounts to less than the budget of a small university and its publication output represents a couple of hundred citable documents per year. The EEA agreement links it closely to Iceland and Norway but its geographical location on Switzerland’s eastern border, national language (German) and the long tradition of close collaboration in many policy fields with the Swiss make joint ventures with Switzerland a much more evident and pragmatic solution. Science and technology are no exception. Liechtenstein is fully associated with the Swiss National Science Foundation, giving its researchers the right to participate in the foundation’s activities. Moreover, Liechtenstein enjoys the same privilege with the Austrian Science Fund, the Austrian equivalent of the Swiss National Science Foundation. Liechtenstein boasts an impressive GERD/GDP ratio of 8 %, according to the national education authority, but this is of limited meaning in international comparisons on account of the extremely small number of actors and nominal figures. Nevertheless, this ratio reflects the high level of R&D undertaken by some of Liechtenstein’s internationally competitive companies in machinery, construction and medical technology, such as Hilti, Oerlikon-Balzers or Ivoclar Vivadent AG; the latter develops products for dentists, employs 130 people in Liechtenstein and about 3 200 people worldwide in 24 countries. Liechtenstein’s public funding of R&D – roughly 0.2% of GDP – goes mainly to the country’s sole public university, the University of Liechtenstein. Founded in its present form in 2005 and formally accredited in 2011, the university concentrates on areas of special relevance for the national economy: finance, management and entrepreneurship, and, to a lesser degree, architecture and planning. The school has got off to a good start; it is attracting a growing number of students from beyond its German-speaking neighbours, not least because of a highly attractive faculty/student ratio. A large proportion of the country’s youth nevertheless studies abroad, mainly in Switzerland, Austria and Germany (Office of Statistics, 2014). Whether Liechtenstein will continue to flourish and earn the international reputation and status it covets remains to be seen. Liechtenstein’s development will, in any case, determine the future of its public R&D sector. If the University of Liechtenstein lives up to expectations in terms of growth and quality, this may incite parliament to rethink its recent decision to drop out of the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme. Innovation is the key element behind Liechtenstein’s strong economy and supportive R&D measures by the public sector could well prove a useful complement to private R&D investment for preserving the country’s advantages in the long run. Chapter 11 303
Page 1:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Towards 2030
Page 4 and 5:
Published in 2015 by the United Nat
Page 6 and 7:
Report team Director of the Publica
Page 8 and 9:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A closer look
Page 10 and 11:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Illustrations
Page 12 and 13:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 6.1: E
Page 14 and 15:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 10.2:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 25.1. S
Page 22 and 23:
Foreword Irina Bokova, Director-Gen
Page 24 and 25:
xxii
Page 26 and 27:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT 2016 Internat
Page 28 and 29:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT strained in m
Page 30 and 31:
A more developmental approach to sc
Page 32 and 33:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT in the contex
Page 34 and 35:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT There are cou
Page 36 and 37:
Science for a sustainable and just
Page 38 and 39:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT provides a ne
Page 40 and 41:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT subjectivity,
Page 42 and 43:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT 2016 20 18
Page 44 and 45:
Many dilemmas appear increasingly c
Page 46 and 47:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT complement th
Page 48 and 49:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT contraried by
Page 50 and 51:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 1.2: Wo
Page 52 and 53:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 1.1: G
Page 54 and 55:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The danger is
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 1.4: L
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 1.5: Pa
Page 64 and 65:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 1.7: W
Page 66 and 67:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The countries
Page 68 and 69:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Research Coun
Page 70 and 71:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT to create res
Page 72 and 73:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT So far, the r
Page 74 and 75:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT a number of r
Page 76 and 77:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Southeast Asi
Page 78 and 79:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT major implica
Page 80 and 81:
Policy-makers should ... focus not
Page 82 and 83:
Figure UNESCO 2.1: SCIENCE Trends i
Page 84 and 85:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT We shall also
Page 86 and 87:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 2.3: I
Page 88 and 89:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 2.5: T
Page 90 and 91:
Figure UNESCO 2.6: SCIENCE Trends i
Page 92 and 93:
Figure UNESCO 2.6 SCIENCE (continue
Page 94 and 95:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Firms prefer
Page 96 and 97:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 2.2: Hi
Page 98 and 99:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 2.9: F
Page 100 and 101:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT drain. In 199
Page 102 and 103:
UNESCO Figure 2.12: SCIENCE Preferr
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT CONCLUSION In
Page 108 and 109:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Gender equali
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
88 Figure 3.2: Share of female rese
Page 114 and 115:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 3.3: S
Page 116 and 117:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 3.2: Sh
Page 118 and 119:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Factoring in
Page 120 and 121:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT views of wome
Page 122 and 123:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT POLICY ISSUES
Page 124 and 125:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT are defined a
Page 126 and 127:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT CONCLUSION A
Page 128 and 129:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT 2016 22 104
Page 130 and 131:
Science powers commerce - but not o
Page 132 and 133:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Some challeng
Page 134 and 135:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 4.2: R&
Page 136 and 137:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT How best to i
Page 138 and 139:
Figure 4.5: Scientific publication
Page 140 and 141:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 4.6: M
Page 142 and 143:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT businesses of
Page 144 and 145:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Canadian Acad
Page 146 and 147:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 4.8: D
Page 148 and 149:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT In 2014, the
Page 150 and 151:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT CONCLUSION Sc
Page 152 and 153:
The future looks brighter for busin
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Policy and Co
Page 158 and 159:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 5.1: The
Page 160 and 161:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 5.2: Indu
Page 162 and 163:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 5.4: R
Page 164 and 165:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 5.5: P
Page 166 and 167:
UNESCO Figure 5.6: SCIENCE Science
Page 168 and 169:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT federal inves
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
UNESCO Figure 5.11: SCIENCE Scienti
Page 176 and 177:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT More foreign
Page 178 and 179:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT had an advers
Page 180 and 181:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT In the absenc
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 6.2: Ov
Page 188 and 189:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Chronic under
Page 190 and 191:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The campus ha
Page 192 and 193:
168 Source: Thomson Reuters Web of
Page 194 and 195:
Bahamas UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Beliz
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A variety of
Page 200 and 201:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT In Venezuela,
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A shift towar
Page 206 and 207:
Figure 7.4: Trends in higher educat
Page 208 and 209:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The Start-Up
Page 210 and 211:
UNESCO Figure 7.7: SCIENCE Trends i
Page 212 and 213:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT TRENDS IN R&D
Page 214 and 215:
Figure 7.8 (continued) Life science
Page 216 and 217:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT For example,
Page 218 and 219:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 7.9: P
Page 220 and 221:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT the major cha
Page 222 and 223:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 7.4: Na
Page 224 and 225:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT these service
Page 226 and 227:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT n the creatio
Page 228 and 229:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 7.4: Ikia
Page 230 and 231:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT n Strengtheni
Page 232 and 233:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A second grou
Page 234 and 235:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Industry must
Page 236 and 237:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT have regained
Page 238 and 239:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The Fourth 3
Page 240 and 241:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT average in ma
Page 242 and 243:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 8.5: S
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 8.5: Inno
Page 248 and 249:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 8.1: In
Page 250 and 251:
UNESCO Figure 8.12: SCIENCE Relativ
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The European
Page 256 and 257:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The first sig
Page 258 and 259:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT 72 months. Wh
Page 260 and 261:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.2: GE
Page 262 and 263:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 9.4: B
Page 264 and 265:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.4: To
Page 266 and 267:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 9.6: I
Page 268 and 269:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.7: (c
Page 270 and 271:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.7: (c
Page 272 and 273:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT EU had alread
Page 274 and 275:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT demand and fu
Page 276 and 277: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.11: E
Page 278 and 279: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 9.12: E
Page 280 and 281: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 9.2: Gali
Page 282 and 283: UNESCO Figure 9.9: SCIENCE Scientif
Page 284 and 285: Figure 9.10: Publication profiles i
Page 286 and 287: Figure 9.11 (continued) All EU memb
Page 288 and 289: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT comprises a p
Page 290 and 291: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT GREECE Aligni
Page 292 and 293: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT SPAIN Making
Page 294 and 295: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT CONCLUSION In
Page 296 and 297: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Southeast Eur
Page 298 and 299: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT The effects o
Page 300 and 301: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 10.2: Sou
Page 302 and 303: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Figure 10.1:
Page 308 and 309: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT COUNTRY PROFI
Page 310 and 311: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT According to
Page 312 and 313: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 10.3: A f
Page 314 and 315: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT n a small num
Page 316 and 317: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT has facilitat
Page 318 and 319: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Countries wil
Page 320 and 321: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A few adjustm
Page 324 and 325: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 11.1: I
Page 328 and 329: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT NORWAY Knowle
Page 332 and 333: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT polytechnique
Page 334 and 335: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Taken togethe
Page 336 and 337: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT All seven cou
Page 338 and 339: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Many post-Sov
Page 340 and 341: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 12.2: T
Page 344 and 345: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT n On the whol
Page 346 and 347: UNESCO Figure 12.6: SCIENCE Scienti
Page 348 and 349: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT COUNTRY PROFI
Page 350 and 351: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT currently wor
Page 352 and 353: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Next steps fo
Page 354 and 355: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT corruption an
Page 356 and 357: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT schemes inclu
Page 358 and 359: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A highly cent
Page 360 and 361: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT UKRAINE Co-op
Page 362 and 363: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT For one thing
Page 364 and 365: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT REFERENCES Ci
Page 366 and 367: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Boosting supp
Page 368 and 369: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT of Economic D
Page 370 and 371: Figure 13.1: Trends in GERD 1.29% 1
Page 372 and 373: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT In 2009, the
Page 374 and 375: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT an imbalance
Page 376 and 377:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT In recent yea
Page 378 and 379:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT n assigning i
Page 380 and 381:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 13.2: Ref
Page 382 and 383:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Along with th
Page 384 and 385:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT More bridges
Page 386 and 387:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT CONCLUSION A
Page 388 and 389:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Progress in C
Page 390 and 391:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Bakiyev was d
Page 392 and 393:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT A focus on un
Page 394 and 395:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 14.2: C
Page 396 and 397:
RUSSIAN FEDERATION UNESCO Figure 14
Page 398 and 399:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT COUNTRY PROFI
Page 400 and 401:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Table 14.3: K
Page 402 and 403:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT reliant on en
Page 404 and 405:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Kyrgyzstan ne
Page 406 and 407:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT it comes to i
Page 408 and 409:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT One of the fi
Page 410:
UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT Box 14.5: Uzb
show all

UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?