Danon Dr Jakov - Jadovno 1941.

he unavoidably undertakes, he humiliates, exiles and executes him. Removing the Evil (Jews)
he enlarges Good, and the consciousness of anti-Semit remains clear, untouched, what makes
him a criminal of Good intentions. By that, ant-Semitism saved something traditional toward
the Gods, making sacrifices of humans. With that, the Jews are just an excuse, somwhere else
it will be the Blackmen, the belonger of a yellow race, for the crime needed to be performed
to dominate the world. Creating a portrait of anti-Semit can be easily understood now, he is
not a man of moral values but the amoral one, who fears not a Jew but himself, his
consciousness, freedom, his instincts, loneliness, the change of world, of everything but a
Jew. By this indifference for all tose questions, he makes secure for the lasting of anti-
Semitism, as well as the of generations. The open Jewish question, in basis, is the truth on
Judaism, as the point of departure of religions and religious communities, it has alwys been
and remained a stumbling block, which, within time, simply bore the millennium anti-
Semitism, which misuses, inspite of democracy and the rule of laws and rights, in practical
life, even today, they have been visible on every step where Jewish communities, as
minorities, participate in social life of local communities. To set the Jewish question: What is
the difference between democrats and anti-Semits? Huge. Anti-Semit wants to destoy a Jew
as a man and to stay to live in him only a Jew, untouchable pariah. Democrat wants to destroy
a Jew, the symbol of ''Jewish consciousness'' and ''Jewish communities'' in order to save a man
as an universal carrier of rights and citizens. It may be that the assimilation gave the answer to
that. National reviving of the Jews and a real awakening of a need of confirmation of Jewish
identity, as the assimilated ones- which we had lately in 1992 throughout, now ex,
Yugoslavia, was defined in a distant 1992 in the work ''New Europe'' by Dr. Alexandar Licht 34
as a ''permanent cessation of outside independence''. ''National reviving is a matter of our
dignity, and, from our people, from intermidiatory, we want to make a creative group. The
goal is not a national egoism but we don't want to be subjugated to the nationalism of other
nations. National individualism, as precious fertilization of culture, which brings estetic and
soul Nirvana, is not exclusive. It does not consider other people enemies but wakes
differenciality in them, as the richness of differentiality of religions and cultures of this Earth
community with an aim of mankind.
In the basis of the regulations of every culture is not the democracy, but a wish to
dominate. Totalitarian regimes, mostly, suppress even the very existence of the Jews, except if
they need them as a ''on call culprit'' or decorative proof on their own democracy. And, to
exactly in the reation toward that unprotected, rights minority a real face of a ruling class can
be seen, and in relation toward the culture of that minority the relation toward the culture at
all. And, the frustrated Zionists, conscious of assimilation, say on that that anti-Semitism and
anti-Semit are not there only where there is no Jew, everything else, in democratic social
world, is possibly acceptible. There are other theses, according to which unitarian regimes,
with the base of democracy, by their own chosen code in dependence to mass, political,
social-economic and local circumstances, on the field and by need, simply negate the
existence of Jewish national minority in the domain of existence of Jewish religious
community, emphasizing, with that, their existence only through unique citizen option, which,
by that, surely makes secure the domination of rights of the majority.
Regardless the fact whether anti-Semitism is being born from the essence of
primitivism, the several centuries created predjudices with the tendency of liberating from
their own condensed hatred toward the Jews (that Jews do not live beside them or let them
live on a distance and the margines of a long taken, their own, collective responsibility as a
national minority), but in its basis inborn a human charcteristic of hatred resides. The
supporters of such attitude in democratic societies show their ability in the aspirations to
trample almost every difference general leveling and enmity toward the different, letting the
34 Dr. Light say: ''I do not thing bringing th proofs on the Jewish nation, which it is that. It is sufficient that we
are younger, more self-conscious and prouder Jewish deneration, and we equally feel and notice the woeld
around us''.
39