Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COmuNiCaziONi ORali<br />
Tab. I. distribution of urine cytology diagnosis for the years 2008 and 2011.<br />
CYTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS<br />
results for repeated samples. Out of 171 cases of inadequate resulting<br />
in 2011, only in one of them inadequacy was due to the<br />
presence of abundant artifact material, the remaining 170 cases<br />
did not show transitional cells.<br />
Among these 85 cases, corresponding to 50%, repeated the test<br />
during the year and resulted negative. So when a cytology examination<br />
of urine is inadequate with the simultaneous filtration<br />
of three samples, we have reasonable certainty that the sample is<br />
actually negative.<br />
In the “negative” group are doubled papillary hyperplasia, increased<br />
from 2 to 4% in 2011, while among the “positive” group<br />
the papillary hyperplasia with atypia reached 5% in 2011 compared<br />
to previous 2%.<br />
The positive predictive value (PPV) for atypical papillary hyperplasia<br />
was particularly powerful (0.75); while lowest, as expected,<br />
the VPP of hyperplasia without atypia (0.38).<br />
Conclusion. The introduction of the new system for the collection<br />
of urine material with fixative alcohol and the change in<br />
assembly method (completely and together filtration of the three<br />
samples), made it possible to increase the number of performance<br />
per year of 67%, also the good preservation of cellular elements,<br />
due to the presence of fixative to the time of sampling, has allowed<br />
to improve the morphological detail and to better identify<br />
the cases to send for more detailed diagnosis.<br />
references<br />
Rosenthal D, Raab SS. Cytologic Detection of Urothelial Lesions.<br />
Springer 2005.<br />
Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, et al., eds. W.H.O. Classification of Tumours.<br />
Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and<br />
Male Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press 2004.<br />
Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, et al. The role of urinary cytology for detection<br />
of bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005:31:304-8.<br />
Rapezzi R, Bondi A. Streamlining the urinary oncology cytological service<br />
in the metropolitan area. Pathologica 2010:04:153-4.<br />
2008 2011<br />
iNaDEQUatE 50 1% 1% 171 2% 2%<br />
NEgatiVE (no inflammation) 2961 62% 4229 59%<br />
NEgatiVE acute inflammation 485 10% <strong>27</strong>3 4%<br />
NEGatiVE chronic inflammation 567 12% 1441 20%<br />
hYPERPlaSia 207 4% 123 1%<br />
PaPillaRY hYPERPlaSia 95 2% 4315 90% <strong>27</strong>0 4% 6336 89%<br />
HYpERplaSia WitH atYpia 203 2% 349 5%<br />
SUSPEct 37 2% 14 1%<br />
PoSitiVE 185 4% 425 8.8% 239 3% 602 8,50%<br />
UrInE SAMPLE TOTAL 4790 21318<br />
PATIEnT TOTAL 1597 7106<br />
Tab. II. Cyto/histological comparison of histology panels of papillary<br />
hyperplasia and papillary hyperplasia with dysplasia.<br />
Papillary<br />
hyperplasia 13<br />
Papillary<br />
hyperplasia<br />
with atipa 20<br />
HISTOLOGY CYTOLOGY<br />
Negative Dysplasia/<br />
Cancer<br />
8 5 PPV 0,38<br />
PNV<br />
0,61<br />
5 15 PPV 0,75<br />
PNV<br />
0,25<br />
293<br />
Diagnostic reproducibility on a digital evaluation<br />
system slide in cytology and histology in<br />
oncologic screening<br />
A. Bondi, S. Lega, P. Crucitti, P. Pierotti, R. Rapezzi, P. Sassoli<br />
de’ Bianchi1 , C. Naldoni1 Anatomia Patologica Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda USL di Bologna,<br />
Italia; 1 Direzione Generale Sanità e Politiche Sociali, Regione Emilia-<br />
Romagna, Italia<br />
Background. Diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy in cytology<br />
and histology are the main issues in Oncologic Screening of cervix,<br />
breast and colorectal cancer: it can be achieved by programs<br />
for quality assurance (QA). The slides set standard represents the<br />
most used method to compare diagnostic proficiency, the chance<br />
of interpreting microscopic digital photographs provided an interesting<br />
alternative to read conventional microscope slides.<br />
The whole digital slide observed in a computer screen is a third,<br />
interesting, option to reach the goal. In fact all the information on<br />
conventional samples are transferred into a file, easily archived,<br />
catalogued, duplicated or advice for quality control, but is especially<br />
available at distance and from multiple locations simultaneously<br />
with drastic reduction of time needed to achieve proficiency<br />
test reproducibility 1 .<br />
The production of digital slides with modern scanners is relatively<br />
simple and quick. All suppliers offer services into private<br />
or public networks server in the literature 2 and software able to<br />
track scanned cases stored in comprehensive database to build<br />
large casistic archives online 3 Tools are already available for<br />
a teleconference discussion of cases with vision of cytological<br />
preparations on line 4 5 , educational programs with integrated digital<br />
slides are poorly developed or proficiency tests for continuing<br />
education and professional updating are easily accessible.<br />
A project on Virtual Microscopy and Digital Pathology has been<br />
conducted in Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) with the goal to<br />
promote quality in diagnostic cytology and histology in Screening<br />
programs by testing a different system involving pathologists<br />
and cytologists using digital slides, with a faster and reproducible<br />
program easier to manage than standard diagnostic sets and by<br />
distance for retraining of patrhologists with a final consensus<br />
meeting.<br />
The aim has been reached with the realization of a management<br />
system for cytological and histological whole-slides digital images<br />
and related clinical data and the building of a picture archive<br />
and communication system (PACS) among pathologists of our<br />
(and probably other) region. This must be backed by software<br />
for the realization of network slide seminars to perform periodic<br />
diagnostic reproducibility and proficiency test. The cases, col-