11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354<br />

Fig. 3. Microscopic appearance of ameloblastic carcinoma. tumor<br />

islands with focal features of ameloblastoma (a) and areas with<br />

obvious malignant aspects as spindle cells, pleomorphism and hyperchromatism,<br />

increased mitotic ratio (B, C, d)..<br />

We present a case of a 15-year old man who was diagnosed, by<br />

occasional OPT, with a large expansive mass at right maxilla.<br />

CT scan demonstrated a mass measuring 48x37x55 mm, which<br />

occupied the entire right maxillary sinus, expanding to the orbit<br />

and the nasal pits. Inferiorly, the tumor eroded the upper alveolar<br />

arch, and was in contact with the masseter muscle (Fig. 1).<br />

The patient underwent surgical asportation and avulsion of the<br />

third upper right molar.<br />

At macroscopic examination, we found a non-ulcerated cystic<br />

mass with adherent thin bony plates within an impacted tooth<br />

and numerous vegetations adherent to the inner surface (Fig. 2).<br />

Histologically our case showed features of odontogenic cyst with<br />

associated areas of stellate reticulum with peripheral palisading<br />

as follicular or plexiform ameloblastoma and tumor islands with<br />

marked cellular atypia, hyperchromatism, nuclear pleomorphism,<br />

showing loss of peripheral palisading or nuclear polarity, increased<br />

mitotic index with 5 mitoses/10HPF (Fig. 3).<br />

Therefore our diagnosis was ameloblastic carcinoma arising from<br />

an odontogenic cyst.<br />

The patient has been followed for 12 months with CT scan of<br />

head and neck, chest radiograph, neck and abdominal ultrasonography,<br />

transnasal fibroendoscopy and CT-PET without evidence<br />

of local recurrences or metastatic localizations.<br />

references<br />

1 Lucca M, D’Innocenzo R, Kraus JA, et al. Ameloblastic carcinoma of<br />

the maxilla: a report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2564-<br />

9.<br />

2 Yoon HJ, Hong SP, Lee JI, et al. Ameloblastic carcinoma: an analysis<br />

of 6 cases with review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral<br />

Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:904-13.<br />

3 Routray S, Majumdar S. Ameloblastic carcinoma: sometimes a challenge.<br />

J Oral Maxillofac Pathol <strong>2012</strong>;16:156-8.<br />

A feasibility evaluation on the dentist’s role for<br />

early diagnosis of oral cancer using a cost/effective<br />

innovative first level test with micro-biopsy<br />

R. Navone, S. Gandolfo1 , M. Pentenero1 , G. Tempia Valenta1 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche ed Oncologia Umana, Università<br />

di Torino; 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Sezione di<br />

Medicina ed Oncologia Orale, Università di Torino<br />

Background. Oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC) and pharyngeal<br />

cancer are amongst the most frequent malignant neoplasia (in 6th<br />

place for cancer-related death). Unfortunately, the last 30 years<br />

have not witnessed any significant improvement in survival rate,<br />

CONGRESSO aNNualE di aNatOmia patOlOGiCa SiapEC – iap • fiRENzE, 25-<strong>27</strong> OttOBRE <strong>2012</strong><br />

most likely due to this type of tumour often being diagnosed at<br />

an advanced stage. Moreover, the therapy required to deal with<br />

advanced stages leads to a highly compromised quality of life<br />

for the patient. Conversely, an early diagnosis has shown a high<br />

5-year survival rate (96.9%) (Pentenero et al., 2011). Noteworthy<br />

is the fact that numerous OSCC often arise on the site of precursor<br />

tumoural lesions (dysplasias) and their identification could<br />

well prevent their malignant transformation. The main obstacle<br />

facing an early diagnosis of OSCC is that this serious tumoural<br />

form and its precursors are easily confused with “clinically apparently<br />

innocent lesions” of inflammatory, traumatic or prosthetic<br />

origin, routine findings in the dentists’ every-day practise. When<br />

symptoms involving the oral mucosa appear the individual usually<br />

refers to his/her G.P., who, in turn, refers the patient to a<br />

dentist. That is why the dentist and G.P. are potentially able to<br />

carry out an effective prevention programme for an early OSCC<br />

diagnosis, as long as they have the necessary “know-how” to do<br />

so, including which tests to perform first and who to refer the patient<br />

to for a definitive diagnosis. The first of such tests available<br />

is the objective examination, which, although is surely necessary<br />

and efficacious, does not suffice, as it is not able to allow for a<br />

distinction between oral potentially malignant lesions (OPML)<br />

from lesions that will never evolve into cancer (Lingen et al.,<br />

2008). Therefore, the use of only an objective examination leads<br />

to the risk of underestimating OPML and/or early-stage cancer<br />

or, on the contrary, overestimating clinically apparently innocent<br />

lesions. First level tests have been proposed to diagnose the intraepithelial<br />

pre-invasive OPML that require scalpel (surgical)<br />

biopsy, but also, and above all, to identify those cases that do not,<br />

which are the majority. The requisites of a first level test include<br />

it not only being reliable and repeatable, but also user-friendly,<br />

even in non-expert hands, as well as it having a high sensitivity<br />

and specificity. To date, the dentist has had only one first level<br />

test at disposal i.e. oral cytology (Navone et al., 2007, 2011),<br />

which is not always easy to perform, has a low sensitivity and<br />

leads to a number of inadequate samples. There is, therefore, an<br />

evident need for a test with enhanced characteristics. The scalpel<br />

biopsy, today’s gold standard, is not a good first level test for the<br />

diagnosis of these lesions (Pentenero et al, 2003) as it is invasive<br />

and has sampling limits: it can be carried out only in restricted<br />

areas and on a limited number of sites and the identification of<br />

the most suitable sampling site is of no easy feat in non-expert<br />

hands. In fact, it may lead to false-negative results, even in the<br />

most expert of hands (Pentenero et al., 2003).<br />

A new sampling technique, called “micro-biopsy”, was developed<br />

by our team and data published (Navone et al., 2008). The<br />

technique involves scraping with a dermatological curette to<br />

obtain microhistological samples, rather than cytological ones. It<br />

is minimally invasive and has a high sensitivity (97.65%), a high<br />

negative predictive value (97.33%) and provides a high percentage<br />

of adequate samples. Although we proposed it be used as a<br />

first level test, before the data on this research project reported<br />

herein, we had no information as to the probability a dentist, nonexpert<br />

in oral mucosal pathology, has in obtaining samples of the<br />

same level. Therefore, this research was aimed at obtaining data<br />

on the capacity a dentist, who is not versed in the field, may have<br />

in the correct use of the micro-biopsy technique with the curette<br />

and to compare these data with those obtained by more expert<br />

hands. The research project was carried out in collaboration with<br />

free-lance dentists, with the aim of evaluating the adequacy of<br />

their sampling of the oral cavity mucosa lesions they came across<br />

in the course of their routine practise.<br />

Materials and methods. We carried out a prospective study<br />

financed by the Piedmont Region (Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata<br />

2008) in collaboration with A.N.D.I. (the National Italian Association<br />

of Dentists). A total of 75 free-lance dentists, working<br />

in the Torino area, were enrolled for a pre-training session on a<br />

voluntary basis, the only inclusion criteria was that they were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!