11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RElaziONi<br />

nuove teorie di patogenesi: l’impatto sulle<br />

nostre diagnosi<br />

L. Resta<br />

Paper not received<br />

I tumori ovarici borderline<br />

M. De Nictolis<br />

Azienda Ospedaliera Marche Nord<br />

I tumori ovarici borderline più frequenti e meglio conosciuti<br />

sono i tumori sierosi e quelli mucinosi con epitelio intestinale.<br />

I borderline sierosi hanno caratteristiche morfologiche e molecolari<br />

ben definite. La prognosi è in genere ottima e solo le<br />

forme associate ad impianti invasivi mostrano un comportamento<br />

biologico aggressivo. Nell’ambito di un tumore sieroso<br />

borderline si possono sviluppare aree di carcinoma sieroso di<br />

basso grado in situ (carcinoma micropapillare con il pattern<br />

della “medusa”) o carcinomi sierosi di basso grado invasivi,<br />

che più raramente possono comparire de novo.<br />

I tumori mucinosi borderline sono neoplasie di grandi dimensioni,<br />

tipicamente polimorfe. Aree morfologicamente<br />

benigne si alternano con aree borderline; in alcuni casi l’epitelio<br />

è atipico realizzando aspetti di carcinoma intraepiteliale;<br />

quando l’atipia citologica si associa ad un pattern di crescita<br />

complesso si parla di carcinoma mucinoso di tipo espansivo.<br />

In rari casi il carcinoma mucinoso infiltra in modo distruttivo<br />

lo stroma alla stregua di un carcinoma del colon realizzandosi<br />

il quadro di un carcinoma mucinoso infiltrante. Il fattore prognostico<br />

principale di queste lesioni è lo stadio; le forme infiltrative<br />

in stadio avanzato sono in pratica le uniche in grado di<br />

progredire rapidamente e sono insensibili alla chemioterapia<br />

abitualmente utilizzata per i carcinomi ovarici. Un’accurata<br />

diagnosi di queste complesse neoplasie è alla base della prognosi,<br />

della terapia e degli studi molecolari.<br />

The frozen section in ovarian pathology<br />

G.F. Zannoni<br />

Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Università<br />

Cattolica del Sacro Cuore<br />

Frozen sections (FS) of ovarian tumors are the most common<br />

ones seen in gynecological pathology, accounting for the largest<br />

number of discrepancies between the intraoperative and<br />

the final diagnosis. In this context these FS should only be<br />

requested if the result will influence the surgical procedure.<br />

The most common scenario is that of an adnexal mass with<br />

clinical and radiological features that suggest a non benign<br />

tumor. The differential diagnosis between a borderline tumor<br />

and an ovarian carcinoma may be difficult.<br />

Most of the mistakes at the time of frozen section are due<br />

to either poor quality of the frozen section slide or sampling<br />

Venerdì, 26 <strong>ottobre</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

Sala Botticelli – 08.30-10.30<br />

Patologia Ginecologica 1<br />

Patologia dell’ovaio<br />

Moderatori: Luigi Resta (Bari), Gian Franco Zannoni (Roma)<br />

223<br />

error. Poor quality can be caused by problems on the frozen<br />

section, fixation or staining.<br />

A common problem is the finding of a solid tumor on the FS<br />

that cannot be classified under any of the common ovarian epithelial<br />

types. Features that favor a serous carcinoma include:<br />

presence of isolated large nuclei more than two time larger<br />

than the average (averaging 15-16 microns): multinucleated<br />

tumor cells (defined as having more than 2 nuclei); macronucleoli<br />

(defined as measuring at least 3 microns); psammomatous<br />

calcifications; and lack of uniformity in size of the nuclei.<br />

Sampling errors are more commonly seen in mucinous tumors<br />

due to their heterogeneity. Once tumor is identified as mucinous,<br />

it is better submit 2 or 3 frozen sections from grossly<br />

different areas. It is useful keep in mind that mucinous carcinomas<br />

are very rare and, as a rule, they contain less mucin that<br />

in the bening or borderline ones. Most tumor that look infiltrative<br />

and have abundant mucin are metastases. Most common<br />

sites being appendix, pancreatic-biliary, large intestine and<br />

cervix. The presence of large pools of mucin either within the<br />

ovarian parenchyma or on the ovarian surface should prompt<br />

a possible diagnosis of metastatic appendical carcinoma<br />

(pseudomyxoma peritonei type). Some of these cases may be<br />

metastatic but have a grossly normal appendix. Nevertheless,<br />

in these cases an appendectomy should be performed to rule<br />

out this possibility.<br />

The differential diagnosis between a primary ovarian carcinoma<br />

and a metastasis can be challenging at the time of FS.<br />

The gross appearance of the tumor can also help. Bilaterality<br />

and the presence of deposits of tumor of the ovarian surface<br />

favor metastases. If the tumor has endometrioid features, features<br />

that favor a primary tumor of the ovary include: an adenofibroma<br />

component, endometriosis, squamous or morular<br />

metaplasia, a sertoliform component (sex-cord like areas), and<br />

a spindle cell component. Features that favor metastasis in endometrioid<br />

like tumors include: extensive necrosis, extensive<br />

desmoplasia, cribriforming with central dirty necrosiss, segmental<br />

distruction of the glands and diffuse lynphovascular<br />

involvement. Metastatic tumors that can have endometrioidlike<br />

feautures include colon, endometrium, gallbladder, bile<br />

ducts and cervix.<br />

In one personal study we analyzed the impact of a specialized<br />

pathologist on the accuracy of frozen section analysis for adnexal<br />

masses.We included women who underwent frozen section<br />

diagnosis for adnexal mass surgery. A specialized and a<br />

general pathologist read the sections. We calculated sensitivity,<br />

specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy<br />

for the whole series, as well as for the specialized and<br />

general pathologist groups. We included 325 patients; in 103<br />

patients (31.7%), frozen section diagnosis was performed by<br />

the specialized and in 222 (68.3%), by the general pathologist.<br />

There was a significant difference in terms of correspondence<br />

between the specialized and the general pathologist groups(P<br />

¼ 0.024). We registered four overdiagnoses (both performed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!