11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pathologica <strong>2012</strong>;104:359-420 POSTEr<br />

BIOLOGIA MOLECOLArE<br />

ThinPrep cytology is a valuable and efficient<br />

method in detecting egfr mutations in lung<br />

adenocarcinomas<br />

V. D’Alicandro, E. Melucci, B. Casini, V. Dimartino, C. Ercolani,<br />

A. Di Benedetto, C.A. Amoreo, M. Filippetti, M. Milella, P. Visca,<br />

E. Pescarmona, M. Mottolese<br />

Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy<br />

Introduction. Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancerrelated<br />

deaths worldwide and adenocarcinoma is recently becoming<br />

the most frequent histologic type among non-small-cell lung<br />

cancers (NSCLC) in many countries. Epidermal growth factor<br />

receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane receptor forming dimers<br />

on ligand binding which stimulates signals through receptor<br />

autophosphorylation. The activation of these intracellular pathways<br />

facilitates malignant transformation and tumor progression.<br />

EGFR, expressed in more than 40% of NSCLC, is mutated in<br />

about 12-13% of cases in Caucasian population, mainly in the<br />

adenocarcinoma histotype. Metastasic NSCLC patients have a<br />

relatively high probability of achieving an objective response to<br />

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib or erlotinib,<br />

only when EGFR gene presents activating mutations in the<br />

tyrosine kinase domain, mainly in exons 19 and 21. In NSCLC the<br />

clinical application of TKIs targeting the EGFR requires the analysis<br />

of gene mutational status 1 . Although cytology is a very common<br />

and useful approach to evaluate patient eligibility to TKIs,<br />

the limited number of tumor cells present in the samples may<br />

constitute a bias for molecular analysis. In the majority of cases,<br />

DNA was extracted from Papanicolau smears or cell blocks 2 and<br />

only in very few studies from ThinPrep processed samples 3 .<br />

Aims. The aims of this study was to evaluate the reliability of<br />

ThinPrep processed cytological specimens, obtained from primary<br />

or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, in detecting EGFR<br />

gene mutations and to verify whether EGFR mutations rate in<br />

ThinPrep processed cytological samples presented an accuracy<br />

and sensitivity similar to bioptic samples.<br />

Materials and methods. DNA was extracted from 66 Liquid<br />

Based Cytology (LBC) cases including 33 CT-guided lung, 15<br />

ultrasound-guided supraclavear or mediastinic lymph nodes and<br />

5 visceral metastases fine needle aspirates (FNA), 7 bronchial<br />

washings, 5 pleural effusions and 1 sputum and from histological<br />

specimens including 32 bronchial and 28 pleural biopsies<br />

retrospectively selected. Exons 19 and 21 was analyzed by direct<br />

sequencing.<br />

Results. The overall specimen insufficiency rate in cytological<br />

and bioptical samples was similar (12.1% vs 11.7%). In our series<br />

of 57 valuable LBC (55% of malignant cells in Papanicolau<br />

smears) we found 7 (12.3%) EGFR mutations, 3 deletions in the<br />

exon 19 and 4 in exon 21 (L858R). 7 (13.2%) out in 53 valuable<br />

biopsies, 4 in the exon 21 and 3 in the exon 19. (Tab. I).<br />

Tab. I. Comparison between EGfR mutations in biopsies and liquid Based<br />

cytology samples.<br />

SPECIMENS EGFR WT<br />

EGFR<br />

MUTATED<br />

NON<br />

VALUABLE<br />

SPECIMENS<br />

TOT.<br />

BiOpSiES 46 7 (13.2%) 7 (11.7%) 60<br />

cYtologY 51 7 (12.3%) 8 (12.1%) 66<br />

Conclusions. These results, obtained using LBC, are highly<br />

concordant with those obtained on bioptic material with an overlapping<br />

number of non valuable cases. Our findings provided<br />

evidence that ThinPrep processed cytological specimens are suitable<br />

for DNA extraction and subsequent EGFR mutation analysis<br />

by direct sequencing; nevertheless novel and more sensitive<br />

techniques (i.e. qPCR) than direct sequencing may enhance LBC<br />

potential in detecting EGFR mutations in NSCLC.<br />

references<br />

1 Pao W, Miller VA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations,<br />

small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and non-small-cell lung cancer: current<br />

knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2556-68.<br />

2 van Eijk R, Licht J, Schrumpf M, et al. Rapid KRAS, EGFR, BRAF<br />

and PIK3CA Mutation Analysis of Fine Needle Aspirates from Non-<br />

Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Allele-Specific qPCR. PLoS One<br />

2011;6:e17791.<br />

3 Lozano MD. Assessment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and<br />

K-Ras Mutation Status in Cytological Stained Smears of Non-Small<br />

Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Correlation with Clinical Outcomes. The<br />

Oncologist 2011;16:877-85.<br />

B-cell clonality and CD20 expression in classical<br />

Hodgkin Lymphoma<br />

L. Marra, M. Cerrone, G. Liguori, V. Gigantino, G. Aquino,<br />

F. Tisci, V. Relli, L. La Sala, C. Santonastaso, A.R. De Chiara,<br />

R. Franco, G. Botti<br />

Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute “Fondazione G. Pascale”,<br />

Naples, Italy<br />

Introduction. Hodgkin Lymphoma is defined as a special kind of<br />

B-cell lymphoma, which usually contains a small number of scattered<br />

Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells in an abundant<br />

background non neoplastic inflammatory and accessory cells.<br />

B-cell lymphoma lack of Ig expression and the clonal B-cell<br />

nature is difficult to be demonstrated, even if in non Hodgkin<br />

Lymphoma, where it requires both immunohistochemical profiling<br />

and monoclonality assessment.<br />

Modern single-cell microdissection technique and molecular genetic<br />

study demonstrate that HRS cell are derived from germinal<br />

center B-cell. Some studies report that HRS cells are positive for<br />

CD20 in 5-58% of CHL cases.<br />

Recents studies revealed that CD20 expression is an independent<br />

poor prognostic factor for the failure free survival (FFS) and<br />

overall survival (OS) in cHL patients, but until now, the role of<br />

CD20 expression is controversial.<br />

Today the presence of clonal B-cell receptor rearrangements has<br />

been considered more supportive of B-cell non-HL. However, the<br />

evolution of a clonal B HRS cell population during the primary<br />

local manifestation of HD and persistence and dissemination of<br />

this clone could indicate that a more advanced B- cell clonality<br />

suggest a more aggressive behavior.<br />

In this study, we have correlated CD20 expression in HRS cell<br />

with B- clonality to evaluate advanced abortive B cell differentiation<br />

in CHL.<br />

Material. We have analyzed 80 paraffin-embedded samples cHL<br />

affects. CD20 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry.<br />

The scoring criteria for the staining intensity of CD20 were<br />

based on those described by Rassidakis and Tzankov. On the<br />

sample with CD20 high expression of HRS cell was performed<br />

clonality analysis using the BIOMED2 control gene primer set.<br />

Results and conclusion. CHL is genotypically considered a Bcell<br />

lymphoma, the classical B-cell marker CD20 is expressed only<br />

in ~20-30% of such cases. In our study we have observed that<br />

44% of samples with high score of CD20 expression, described<br />

by Rassidakis and Tzankov, were monoclonal and all samples<br />

with absence of CD20 expression have polyclonal pattern.<br />

Χ 2 – Test shown association between score 3 sec Tzankov and<br />

B-clonality.<br />

Our results indicated that the presence routine PCR methods are<br />

sensitive enough to detect small numbers of malignant cells in<br />

cHL. We propose the use of clonality in association with immunochemistry<br />

to identify cHL with B cell differentiation with<br />

significant prognostic implication.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!