11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

296<br />

Histologic quality control of frozen samples using<br />

matching FFPE tissue – preliminary results of our<br />

institutional biobank<br />

E. Mattioli1 , E. Foglia Manzillo1 , V. Rubini1 , F. Palma2 , A. Paradiso3<br />

1 2<br />

, G. Simone<br />

1 2 Institutional BioBank at Anatomic Pathology Unit; Anatomic Pathology<br />

Unit; 3 Scientific Management National Cancer Research Centre, Istituto<br />

Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”<br />

Background. Biobanking is an emerging discipline which is becoming<br />

more and more important in the contemporary research<br />

scenario, as it is aimed at providing high quality samples (particularly<br />

frozen ones) for biomolecular investigation. Integral part of<br />

biobanking operations are tissue quality control (QC) procedures,<br />

which verify and assure the adequacy of the collected samples<br />

for research purposes 1-4 . Pathologists are particularly involved<br />

in histological QC, which verifies that the banked samples are<br />

representative of the whole lesion and are suitable for research<br />

purposes, according to their pathological attributes. At our<br />

Institution, we perform histological QC procedures by evaluating<br />

critical immuno-morphological features (tumor cellularity,<br />

amount of necrosis, inflammatory infiltrate, fibrosis and nonneoplastic<br />

tissue components, proliferative index) not only on<br />

the frozen biobank samples, but also on matching formalin-fixed,<br />

paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material, which is easier to handle<br />

and provides better morphological detail. Aim of this study was<br />

to verify the concordance of those features on sections from the<br />

frozen aliquots and from the corresponding paraffin tissue blocks.<br />

Materials and methods. At our Pathology Department, as a<br />

routine procedure, each biobank-dedicated tissue sample is cut in<br />

two “mirror-matching halves”: one half is reduced into aliquotes,<br />

which are weighed and frozen; the other half is sent to routine histological<br />

processing to prepare a “specular” FFPE tissue block. 15<br />

consecutive breast cancer cases from our Institutional Biobank were<br />

considered for this study. For each case, multiple sections were cut<br />

from one frozen aliquot and from the specular FFPE block; critical<br />

parameters (percentage of tumor cells, MIB-1 proliferative index)<br />

were then evaluated on both frozen and paraffin sections.<br />

Results. The comparison of frozen aliquots with specular FFPE<br />

tissue showed a variable degree of discrepancy, due to the intrinsic<br />

heterogeneity of tumor tissue (Fig. 1). Predictably, the<br />

fraction of concordant cases significantly varied according to the<br />

stringency of the discrepancy threshold chosen (Tab. I). As for<br />

the percentage of neoplastic cells, 60% of cases (9/15) showed<br />

concordant values between frozen and paraffin sections when a<br />

10% deviation was allowed; raising the allowed deviation to 20%<br />

Fig. 1. heterogeneous miB-1 labeling in one of our breast cancer<br />

cases.<br />

CONGRESSO aNNualE di aNatOmia patOlOGiCa SiapEC – iap • fiRENzE, 25-<strong>27</strong> OttOBRE <strong>2012</strong><br />

Tab. I. figures of tumor cellularity and miB-1 labeling of each couple<br />

of samples (frozen and ffpE) are shown on the left side. Concordance<br />

percentages for different discrepancy thresholds are shown on the right<br />

side. Colors highlight different discrepancy thresholds.<br />

Case ID Tumor<br />

cellularity<br />

MIB-1 labeling<br />

142/12 frozen 50% 10%<br />

142/12 ffpE 50% 13%<br />

139/12 frozen 35% 17%<br />

139/12 ffpE 35% 25%<br />

135/12 frozen 20% 2%<br />

135/12 ffpE 20% 3%<br />

100/12 frozen 20% 60%<br />

100/12 ffpE 25% 40%<br />

133/12 frozen 60% 90%<br />

133/12 ffpE 70% 85%<br />

99/12 frozen 65% 50%<br />

99/12 ffpE 75% 38%<br />

87/12 frozen 85% 28%<br />

87/12 ffpE 80% 15%<br />

92/12 frozen 60% 7%<br />

92/12 ffpE 70% 17%<br />

95/12 frozen 70% 15%<br />

95/12 ffpE 70% 10%<br />

105/12 frozen 55% 35%<br />

105/12 ffpE 70% 18%<br />

144/12 frozen 50% 10%<br />

144/12 ffpE 70% 15%<br />

97/12 frozen 60% 12%<br />

97/12 ffpE 40% 7%<br />

132/12 frozen 38% 5%<br />

132/12 ffpE 75% 15%<br />

145/12 frozen 30% 20%<br />

145/12 ffpE 55% 20%<br />

94/12 frozen 40% 50%<br />

94/12 ffpE 80% 40%<br />

Concordance rates<br />

tumor cellularity<br />

- with a 10% discrepancy 60% (9/15)<br />

- with a 15% discrepancy 66,7% (10/15)<br />

- with a 20% discrepancy<br />

miB-1 labeling index<br />

80% (12/15)<br />

- with a 5% discrepancy 40% (6/15)<br />

- with a 10% discrepancy 66,7% (10/15)<br />

- with a 15% discrepancy 86,7% (13/15)<br />

brought the concordance fraction up to 80% (12/15). As for the<br />

proliferative index, only 40% of cases (6/15) showed concordant<br />

results when allowing a strict 5% discrepancy between frozen<br />

aliquots and specular FFPE tissue, while concordance raised to<br />

86.7% (13/15 cases) when tolerating a 15% deviation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!