11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

372<br />

MRI demonstrated pancreas with structural alterations at the<br />

uncinate portion due to the presence of a nodular mass of around<br />

3.5cm with a fluid component in itscontext. The formation appeared<br />

with a vanishing profile and was strictly adherent to the<br />

anterior wall of the third duodenal.<br />

On the basis of above findings, the presence of a tumor in the<br />

uncinate process of the pancreas was strongly suspected.<br />

The patient was subjected to cefaloduodenopancreasectomy.<br />

Macroscopic examination of the surgical specimen showed a<br />

well-demarcated round yellowish mass measuring 4x3.5 cm.<br />

Final histology demonstrated a ductal adenoncarcinoma of tha<br />

pancreas (G3) with a signet ring cells component. The neoplasms<br />

infiltrated the intestinal wall and peripancreatic tissue. None of the<br />

13 peripancreatic lymph node has shown a center of metastases.<br />

The patient was kept on regular follow-up by the oncologist for<br />

palliative cure.<br />

Gastric metastases from lobular breast carcinoma:<br />

a diagnostic challenge<br />

A. Guadagno * , T. Celiento * , F. Sarocchi * , M. Gualco ** , R. Ponte * ,<br />

P. Calamaro * , F. Grillo * , L. Mastracci *<br />

* ** University of Genoa, Histopathology DISC; IST S.C. of Anatomy,<br />

Cyto-Histology and Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San<br />

Martino-IST- I.R.C.C.S. Largo Rosanna Benzi 10 Genoa, Italy<br />

Introduction. A study, over a 30-year period from 1993, reports<br />

more than 1000 cases of gastrointestinal metastases from breast<br />

cancer 1 . The incidence of extrahepatic gastrointestinal tract<br />

metastases from lobular carcinoma observed in autopsy studies<br />

varies in the literature from 6% to 18% with the most commonly<br />

affected organ being the stomach, small bowel followed by colon<br />

and rectum 2 . Gastric metastases of breast carcinoma are rare<br />

but when they occur they represent a major diagnostic dilemma<br />

especially if incomplete clinical information is given. We report<br />

two cases of metastatic breast cancer with signet-ring cells to the<br />

stomach and review the literature.<br />

Materials and methods. Case report 1: A 63-year old female went<br />

to gastroenterology consultation complaining of aspecific gastrointestinal<br />

symptoms. Abdominal CT scan showed thickening of<br />

the gastric wall without focal thoracic or abdominal lesions. Upper<br />

gastrointestinal endoscopy showed friable mucosa with two ulcers<br />

at the antrum and body in a background of linitis plastica. Biopsies<br />

of the antrum, body and gastric fundus were performed.<br />

Case report 2: A 64-year old female underwent mastectomy of<br />

the right breast for lobular carcinoma with positive margins (staging<br />

not available) at an outside institution. The patient performed<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy in the same year. Two years later, the<br />

patient represented complaining of vague gastrointestinal symptoms.<br />

Abdominal RMI scan showed thickening of the gastric<br />

wall with severe stenosis, concentric thickening of rectal wall.<br />

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed erythematous mucosa,<br />

evidence of linitis plastica, with marked stenosis of the lumen.<br />

Sigmoidoscopy showed erythematous and edematous mucosa<br />

with thickened wall and a biopsy of the rectum was performed.<br />

She underwent a partial gastrectomy because of severe gastric<br />

stenosis during the same admission.<br />

Results. Case report 1: Gastric biopsies revealed the presence<br />

of poorly differentiated carcinoma. The neoplastic cells had eosinophilic<br />

cytoplasm with signet-ring appearance and hyperchromatic<br />

nucleus. Cells were non cohesive and dispersed in single<br />

elements. A first diagnosis of diffuse type non cohesive gastric<br />

cancer was made. Further clinical information revealed that earlier<br />

the same year, the patient had been diagnosed with a lobular<br />

breast carcinoma with axillary lymphadenopathy on VABB core<br />

biopsy of a mass in her left breast (staging not available) at a<br />

different institution. The primary breast carcinoma showed the<br />

following immunohistochemistry (IHC) profile: Cytokeratin<br />

7 (CK7) positive, Cytokeratin 34βE12 positive, E-Cadherin<br />

CONGRESSO aNNualE di aNatOmia patOlOGiCa SiapEC – iap • fiRENzE, 25-<strong>27</strong> OttOBRE <strong>2012</strong><br />

positive, Estrogen receptor (ER) positive, Cytokeratin 20 (CK20)<br />

negative and Progesterone receptor (PgR) negative. The gastric<br />

neoplastic cells also stained positive with CK 7, Cytokeratin<br />

34βE12, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and<br />

ER. Neoplastic cells were negative for CK20, for E-Cadherin<br />

and for PgR. The diagnosis of metastatic lobular carcinoma (with<br />

signet-ring cells) to stomach was made.<br />

Case report 2: Histological examination of rectal biopsies showed<br />

the presence of isolated neoplastic elements, with signet-ring appearance<br />

in the lamina propria. Further clinical information was<br />

sought and only at this point was information of a previous breast<br />

primary and of gastric wall thickening given to the pathologist.<br />

IHC was therefore performed and this showed expression of<br />

CK7, Cytokeratin 34βE12, GCDFP-15 and ER. Neoplastic cells<br />

were negative for CK20, for caudal type homeobox transcription<br />

factor 2 (CDX2) and for PgR. Histological examination of the<br />

gastric specimen showed severe luminal stenosis due to diffuse<br />

infiltration of atypical cells with signet-ring cells morphology.<br />

IHC showed the same immunoprofile. The diagnosis of metastatic<br />

lobular carcinoma (with signet-ring cells) to stomach and<br />

rectum was made.<br />

Discussion. Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant tumor<br />

to metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract in women and is second<br />

only to malignant melanoma 3 . Metastatic invasive lobular<br />

carcinoma can mimic gastric cancer 4 5 and incidence of breast<br />

cancer metastasis to the stomach in long term follow up and post<br />

mortem studies has been estimated at 2–18% 6 7 . It is important<br />

to remember that metastatic spread may be seen years after the<br />

diagnosis of the primary breast lesion.<br />

Distinction between metastatic lobular breast cancer and diffuse<br />

type gastric cancer is possible only with adequate clinical information<br />

and an immunohistochemical panel. Metastatic breast<br />

carcinoma is usually positive for CK7, GCDFP-15, ER and PgR<br />

and negative for CK20. CK20 proves to be useful as it is positive<br />

in gastric cancer while it is not observed in breast carcinomas 8 .<br />

CK7 is less useful as it is expressed in 90% of breast carcinomas<br />

and its expression was also observed in 50-64% of primary<br />

gastric adenocarcinoma 9 . Although primary gastric cancer has<br />

been reported to show ER and PgR positivity 10 , Van Velthuysen<br />

et al. 11 report that ERα can be reliably used to diagnose gastric<br />

metastasis from breast cancer because no primary gastric tumor<br />

express ERα. They observe that the absence of E-cadherin staining<br />

was significantly related to metastatic breast carcinoma 12 .<br />

Furthermore, cytoplasmic positivity for GCDFP-15 may confirm<br />

mammary origin. Positive staining with GCDFP-15 has been<br />

found to be a sensitive (55-76%) and specific (95-100%) marker<br />

for correctly identifying a malignant lesion as metastatic breast<br />

carcinoma 13 . An excellent correlation between GCDFP-15<br />

positivity and the origin of a metastatic breast adenocarcinoma<br />

has been demonstrated. Mammoglobin is another marker, which<br />

is more sensitive but less specific compared to GCDFP-15. In<br />

conclusion a correct history of patients and histological examination<br />

and immunohistochemical analysis of the gastrointestinal<br />

biopsies in comparison with the original breast cancer histology<br />

are essential to support the diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer<br />

to gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians must therefore be aware of the<br />

difficult differential diagnosis and must supply adequate clinical<br />

information especially concerning any previous malignancy.<br />

Case report n. 2. Rectal biopsy: A) (H&E) 40x; B) CK7 40x; C)<br />

CK20 40x; D) ER 40x; E) GCDFP15 40x. Gastric specimen: F)<br />

H&E 40x; G) CK 7 10x; H) CK20 10x; I) ER 20x; GCDFP-15<br />

20x.<br />

references<br />

1 Madeya S, Borsch G. Gastrointestinal metastases of breast carcinoma.<br />

Gastrointest Endoscopy 1993;39:103-4.<br />

2 Arrangoiz R, Papavasiliou P, Dushkin H, et al. Report and literature<br />

review: Metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast an unusual presentation.<br />

Int J Surg Case Rep 2011;2:301-5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!