11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COmuNiCaziONi ORali<br />

in the leading Institutions of Anatomic Pathology in Italy and in<br />

the most diffuse Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) to plan<br />

a strategy to converge in a national coding system. This operation<br />

should also re-direct Italian Pathology to the international<br />

scenario, favouring and coordinating cultural and scientific collaborations<br />

between the Associations involved in medical informatics,<br />

epidemiology and tumour registry. Actors of this project<br />

are Scientific Societies of the field (SIAPEC-IAP and AIRTum),<br />

the Italian Contributor Centre of WHO for Health Codes (CC-<br />

WHO) and few Regional Health Agencies (Friuli-Venezia Giulia,<br />

Liguria and the cooperation of Emilia-Romagna and Lombardia).<br />

Aim of the Nomenclature for Anatomic Pathology (NAP) is to<br />

become the national reference, for improvements and updating,<br />

shared by the Pathologists’ community.<br />

Material and Methods. A common nomenclature for Italian Pathologies<br />

has been built on the existing ones. This tool, namely<br />

the Nomenclature of Pathology Italian (NAP), was designed with<br />

the following characteristics:<br />

Identification of a work group, constituted by Pathologists from<br />

different Italian Anatomic Pathology, an operator editing different<br />

tables (see below), sometimes in collaboration with other<br />

centre; a group coordinator;<br />

ICD-O 3 acquisition to create the core of NAP 3 ;<br />

The tables in use in major Italian Institutions were compared with<br />

ICD-O 3 and fused together: similar conceptual meaning of the<br />

words with different codes have been unified;<br />

As fare-nomenclature for procedure has been adopted that from<br />

SIAPEC-IAP of 2002 and published on website of the Society;<br />

The system to represent the results of laboratory methods, especially<br />

those of molecular biology, has been derived from LOINC<br />

- Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes, the largest<br />

and most popular system for Clinical Pathology;<br />

Where possible, a logical connection with SNOMED International<br />

and, indirectly, with SNOMED CT was maintained;<br />

Synonyms, obsolete terms and acronyms that have emerged from<br />

the tables obtained to arrange the NAP are all managed.<br />

NAP code. NAP is a multi-axes coding system, namely a complex<br />

medical concept is broken into many simple concepts represented<br />

by codes. This criterion is the same established for SNOP<br />

and afterwards in SNOMED until the International NAP concepts<br />

are organized in chapters or knowledge axes: Topography, Morphology,<br />

Procedures, Diseases, Links, Chemicals, Physicals, Living<br />

Organisms and other less important.<br />

Each concept belongs to a Chapter (to whom is hierarchical<br />

related by a connector, called SUPER) and is represented by a<br />

CODE and a DESCRIPTION.<br />

The code is composed of 10 alphanumerical characters, the<br />

first of which is a letter representing the chapter, followed by<br />

a hyphen. Central digits of code are derived from ICD-O or<br />

SNOMED, while the last digit of each code, the more on the right,<br />

is reserved to synonyms and acronyms: if 0 (zero) indicates the<br />

main term, in any other case represents a synonymous.<br />

The description consists in a scope describing the concept in Italian<br />

and in English languages.<br />

NAP and others nomenclatures<br />

ICD-O. ICD-O 3 represents the core of NAP. In facts NAP code<br />

is constituted by 10 digit and morphology chapters “M-8” e “M-<br />

9” exactly include ICD-O codes.<br />

NAP Code for cancer: M-8000300B - ICD-O Code for cancer:<br />

M-8000/3<br />

The letter at the beginning, hyphen (optional in ICD-O), and<br />

initial 4 numbers are identical to ICD-O, last three digit of NAP<br />

code allows to manage synonyms and acronyms, that are not essential<br />

for Tumour Registries, but may be very useful for medical<br />

(and pathological) records.<br />

For topographic codes have been adopted criteria followed in<br />

SNOMED International and were added link to ICD-O topography,<br />

too broad for applications in Anatomic Pathology.<br />

295<br />

SNOMED CT. Structure of NAP code is clearly inspired by<br />

SNOP and to first version of SNOMED, but absolutely missing<br />

the systematic of these two nomenclatures.<br />

Semantic organization of SNOMED CT is markedly different<br />

through the elaboration of knowledge engineering gradually<br />

more elaborate (4): code is no longer “speaking” but a unique<br />

16 digit code, unmanageable in a direct coding (manual). Each<br />

concept identified by unique code, can be expressed by more<br />

terms, one of them “preferred”. A strict system of reference and<br />

attribute manages relations between terms and allows inference,<br />

logical and semantic links.<br />

SNOMED CT is the more widespread multilingual medical vocabulary<br />

ever realized, but information system of Italian Pathology<br />

are still bound to second version of SNOMED or in some<br />

case to SNOMED International, but none apply the version “References<br />

Terminology” (RT) nor “Clinical Terms” (CT).<br />

In this view NAP has also the role of a bridge to unify Italian<br />

codes into SNOMED CT and ICD 11, where presumably it will<br />

converge.<br />

LOINC. The system, utilized for Clinical Pathology Laboratory<br />

and for quantification of exams, can easily be applied to molecular<br />

biology to. However in Pathologic Anatomy, even if there are<br />

study to map or link parts of SNOMED to LOINC 5 , these two<br />

coding systems are not exclusive, namely the use of one of them<br />

is not sufficient.<br />

Release of NAP versions. First target of NAP is to maintain<br />

aligned the different versions produced after addiction or modification<br />

of codes resulting from comparison with new tables:<br />

presumably a four or six-monthly updating.<br />

Results and discussion. Advantages of NAP. The availability<br />

of a unified nomenclature, realized and diffuse from the Italian<br />

Scientific Society of Anatomic Pathology represents the basis to<br />

cancel differences between diagnostic nomenclatures of Italian<br />

Pathologists and to recognize the value of the big work in terms<br />

of coding produced every day from Pathologies in our country.<br />

The outcome in terms of data entirety, information sharing in<br />

medical records (local or network), case studies, epidemiology<br />

analysis, relation with Tumour and Pathology Registries has a big<br />

potential scientific and practice, to improve the role of Pathology.<br />

Limits of NAP. The NAP is a local vocabulary to drive Italian<br />

Pathologies to SNOMED and more generally to ICD 11, that will<br />

be available in 2015.<br />

NAP has been built from the fusion of many tables validated from<br />

many years use in important Institutions, but without systematic<br />

in many fields of medical science, or in other words doesn’t cover<br />

the huge vocabulary of systematic nomenclature drawn by Roger<br />

Coté into SNOP and later into SNOMED 6 .<br />

NAP needs in fact periodic maintenance of terms and a scientific<br />

committee to validate new terms, corrections and to drive relations<br />

with international catalogues, first of all WHO, to coherently<br />

direct evolution.<br />

references<br />

1 Bondi A, Nesti P, Rossi Mori A. SNOMED International. Microglossario<br />

di patologia (Lingua italiana), ed 1. Udine:, Pubblicazioni<br />

Medico Scientifiche 1995.<br />

2 International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation<br />

(IHTSDO). http://www.ihtsdo.org/.<br />

3 Giacomin A, Ferretti S. ICD-O Classificazione Internazionale delle<br />

Malattie per l’Oncologia. Terza Edizione. Traduzione Italiana di<br />

“International Diseases Classification for Oncology” (C) WHO 2000.<br />

Milano: Inferenze Scarl 2005.<br />

4 Lee D, Cornet R, Lau F. Implications of SNOMED CT versioning. Int<br />

J Med Inform 2011;80:442-53.<br />

5 Bodenreider O. Issues in mapping LOINC laboratory tests to SNOMED<br />

CT. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008;51-5.<br />

6 Cote’ RA. The SNOP-SNOMED concept: evolution towards a common<br />

medical nomenclature and classification. Pathologist 1977;31:383-98.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!