Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COmuNiCaziONi ORali<br />
in the leading Institutions of Anatomic Pathology in Italy and in<br />
the most diffuse Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) to plan<br />
a strategy to converge in a national coding system. This operation<br />
should also re-direct Italian Pathology to the international<br />
scenario, favouring and coordinating cultural and scientific collaborations<br />
between the Associations involved in medical informatics,<br />
epidemiology and tumour registry. Actors of this project<br />
are Scientific Societies of the field (SIAPEC-IAP and AIRTum),<br />
the Italian Contributor Centre of WHO for Health Codes (CC-<br />
WHO) and few Regional Health Agencies (Friuli-Venezia Giulia,<br />
Liguria and the cooperation of Emilia-Romagna and Lombardia).<br />
Aim of the Nomenclature for Anatomic Pathology (NAP) is to<br />
become the national reference, for improvements and updating,<br />
shared by the Pathologists’ community.<br />
Material and Methods. A common nomenclature for Italian Pathologies<br />
has been built on the existing ones. This tool, namely<br />
the Nomenclature of Pathology Italian (NAP), was designed with<br />
the following characteristics:<br />
Identification of a work group, constituted by Pathologists from<br />
different Italian Anatomic Pathology, an operator editing different<br />
tables (see below), sometimes in collaboration with other<br />
centre; a group coordinator;<br />
ICD-O 3 acquisition to create the core of NAP 3 ;<br />
The tables in use in major Italian Institutions were compared with<br />
ICD-O 3 and fused together: similar conceptual meaning of the<br />
words with different codes have been unified;<br />
As fare-nomenclature for procedure has been adopted that from<br />
SIAPEC-IAP of 2002 and published on website of the Society;<br />
The system to represent the results of laboratory methods, especially<br />
those of molecular biology, has been derived from LOINC<br />
- Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes, the largest<br />
and most popular system for Clinical Pathology;<br />
Where possible, a logical connection with SNOMED International<br />
and, indirectly, with SNOMED CT was maintained;<br />
Synonyms, obsolete terms and acronyms that have emerged from<br />
the tables obtained to arrange the NAP are all managed.<br />
NAP code. NAP is a multi-axes coding system, namely a complex<br />
medical concept is broken into many simple concepts represented<br />
by codes. This criterion is the same established for SNOP<br />
and afterwards in SNOMED until the International NAP concepts<br />
are organized in chapters or knowledge axes: Topography, Morphology,<br />
Procedures, Diseases, Links, Chemicals, Physicals, Living<br />
Organisms and other less important.<br />
Each concept belongs to a Chapter (to whom is hierarchical<br />
related by a connector, called SUPER) and is represented by a<br />
CODE and a DESCRIPTION.<br />
The code is composed of 10 alphanumerical characters, the<br />
first of which is a letter representing the chapter, followed by<br />
a hyphen. Central digits of code are derived from ICD-O or<br />
SNOMED, while the last digit of each code, the more on the right,<br />
is reserved to synonyms and acronyms: if 0 (zero) indicates the<br />
main term, in any other case represents a synonymous.<br />
The description consists in a scope describing the concept in Italian<br />
and in English languages.<br />
NAP and others nomenclatures<br />
ICD-O. ICD-O 3 represents the core of NAP. In facts NAP code<br />
is constituted by 10 digit and morphology chapters “M-8” e “M-<br />
9” exactly include ICD-O codes.<br />
NAP Code for cancer: M-8000300B - ICD-O Code for cancer:<br />
M-8000/3<br />
The letter at the beginning, hyphen (optional in ICD-O), and<br />
initial 4 numbers are identical to ICD-O, last three digit of NAP<br />
code allows to manage synonyms and acronyms, that are not essential<br />
for Tumour Registries, but may be very useful for medical<br />
(and pathological) records.<br />
For topographic codes have been adopted criteria followed in<br />
SNOMED International and were added link to ICD-O topography,<br />
too broad for applications in Anatomic Pathology.<br />
295<br />
SNOMED CT. Structure of NAP code is clearly inspired by<br />
SNOP and to first version of SNOMED, but absolutely missing<br />
the systematic of these two nomenclatures.<br />
Semantic organization of SNOMED CT is markedly different<br />
through the elaboration of knowledge engineering gradually<br />
more elaborate (4): code is no longer “speaking” but a unique<br />
16 digit code, unmanageable in a direct coding (manual). Each<br />
concept identified by unique code, can be expressed by more<br />
terms, one of them “preferred”. A strict system of reference and<br />
attribute manages relations between terms and allows inference,<br />
logical and semantic links.<br />
SNOMED CT is the more widespread multilingual medical vocabulary<br />
ever realized, but information system of Italian Pathology<br />
are still bound to second version of SNOMED or in some<br />
case to SNOMED International, but none apply the version “References<br />
Terminology” (RT) nor “Clinical Terms” (CT).<br />
In this view NAP has also the role of a bridge to unify Italian<br />
codes into SNOMED CT and ICD 11, where presumably it will<br />
converge.<br />
LOINC. The system, utilized for Clinical Pathology Laboratory<br />
and for quantification of exams, can easily be applied to molecular<br />
biology to. However in Pathologic Anatomy, even if there are<br />
study to map or link parts of SNOMED to LOINC 5 , these two<br />
coding systems are not exclusive, namely the use of one of them<br />
is not sufficient.<br />
Release of NAP versions. First target of NAP is to maintain<br />
aligned the different versions produced after addiction or modification<br />
of codes resulting from comparison with new tables:<br />
presumably a four or six-monthly updating.<br />
Results and discussion. Advantages of NAP. The availability<br />
of a unified nomenclature, realized and diffuse from the Italian<br />
Scientific Society of Anatomic Pathology represents the basis to<br />
cancel differences between diagnostic nomenclatures of Italian<br />
Pathologists and to recognize the value of the big work in terms<br />
of coding produced every day from Pathologies in our country.<br />
The outcome in terms of data entirety, information sharing in<br />
medical records (local or network), case studies, epidemiology<br />
analysis, relation with Tumour and Pathology Registries has a big<br />
potential scientific and practice, to improve the role of Pathology.<br />
Limits of NAP. The NAP is a local vocabulary to drive Italian<br />
Pathologies to SNOMED and more generally to ICD 11, that will<br />
be available in 2015.<br />
NAP has been built from the fusion of many tables validated from<br />
many years use in important Institutions, but without systematic<br />
in many fields of medical science, or in other words doesn’t cover<br />
the huge vocabulary of systematic nomenclature drawn by Roger<br />
Coté into SNOP and later into SNOMED 6 .<br />
NAP needs in fact periodic maintenance of terms and a scientific<br />
committee to validate new terms, corrections and to drive relations<br />
with international catalogues, first of all WHO, to coherently<br />
direct evolution.<br />
references<br />
1 Bondi A, Nesti P, Rossi Mori A. SNOMED International. Microglossario<br />
di patologia (Lingua italiana), ed 1. Udine:, Pubblicazioni<br />
Medico Scientifiche 1995.<br />
2 International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation<br />
(IHTSDO). http://www.ihtsdo.org/.<br />
3 Giacomin A, Ferretti S. ICD-O Classificazione Internazionale delle<br />
Malattie per l’Oncologia. Terza Edizione. Traduzione Italiana di<br />
“International Diseases Classification for Oncology” (C) WHO 2000.<br />
Milano: Inferenze Scarl 2005.<br />
4 Lee D, Cornet R, Lau F. Implications of SNOMED CT versioning. Int<br />
J Med Inform 2011;80:442-53.<br />
5 Bodenreider O. Issues in mapping LOINC laboratory tests to SNOMED<br />
CT. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008;51-5.<br />
6 Cote’ RA. The SNOP-SNOMED concept: evolution towards a common<br />
medical nomenclature and classification. Pathologist 1977;31:383-98.