Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RElaziONi<br />
“gold-standard panel”. Information regarding specific molecular<br />
abnormalities of neoplastic cells is necessary in order<br />
to assess the eligibility of Patients to specific “targeted” therapies.<br />
New strategies are currently under evaluation to define<br />
simplified diagnostic charts based on morpho-molecular techniques<br />
useful to detect and quantify abnormalities in target<br />
pathways. FISH analysis is the gold-standard technique for<br />
evaluate the presence of gene translocations, amplifications,<br />
gains and losses (e.g. FISH analysis for ALK translocation,<br />
FGFR1 gene amplification). New antibodies can provide better<br />
evaluation of target-protein expression (e.g. ALK). The<br />
availability of mutation-specific monoclonal antibodies (e.g.<br />
specific for BRAF V600E mutation) can represent a promising<br />
tool in future studies. BRAF and C-MET genes are going<br />
to be promising biomarkers, selected for new clinical trials.<br />
Co-targeting more molecular pathways such as pi3k–Akt,<br />
Ras–Erk, T790M, and c-Met, together with ErbB receptors,<br />
may produce anticancer effects that are more optimal.<br />
An extremely important key-point will be to understand the<br />
driven receptor regulators involved in receptor degradation or<br />
recycling. An ubiquitin lipase c-Cbl involved in internalization<br />
and degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor<br />
(egfr) is frequently mutated or lost in lung cancer and stressactivated<br />
kinases such as p38 have been implicated in egfr<br />
recycling and endosomal accumulation. Those events may<br />
contribute to resistance to antibody or tyrosine kinase inhibitors<br />
in the treatment of NSCLC. Overall, co-targeting key<br />
pathways involved in receptor recycling and receptor activity<br />
may increase treatment efficacy and decrease the development<br />
of tumour resistance.<br />
Since the 1980s, chemotherapy for patients with non-smallcell<br />
lung cancer has been shown to provide a small improvement<br />
in survival. In the early 1990s, platinum-based regimens<br />
became the treatment of choice. In 2002, the Eastern Cooperative<br />
Oncology Group 1594 clinical trial showed that there was<br />
no overall survival difference among four common chemotherapy<br />
regimens used in non-small-cell lung cancer. It was<br />
not until 2006 when the introduction of biologic agents into<br />
the field of lung cancer improved, for the first time ever, median<br />
overall survival beyond 1 year. Nowadays, we recognize<br />
that there are differences between all histological subtypes<br />
of non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of their response to<br />
specific agents. All these plus the introduction of molecular<br />
medicine have resulted in the identification of markers for<br />
prognosis and prediction in lung cancer.<br />
ALK<br />
In a subset of patients with NSCLC, the anaplastic lymphoma<br />
kinase (ALK) and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein<br />
like 4 (EML4) gene have been recently found to undergo<br />
fusion as a result of an inversion on the short arm of chromosome<br />
2 resulting in the novel oncogene EML4-ALK. This<br />
gene rearrangement occurs largely independent from EGFR or<br />
K-Ras mutations. Patients with this fusion oncogene tend to be<br />
younger, have adenocarcinoma with acinar histology, and be<br />
never or light smokers. The overall incidence of EML4-ALK<br />
rearrangement has been reported to be 4% - 7%. Patients<br />
harboring the fusion oncogene were retrospectively studied<br />
to examine its effect on both cytotoxic chemotherapy and<br />
tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy response. When comparing<br />
those who did and did not harbor the EML4-ALK fusion oncogene,<br />
there were no differences in response rates or time to<br />
progression in those treated with platinum-based combination<br />
therapy, whereas there was no clinical response and a time to<br />
progression of 5 months for those treated with EGFR TKIs.<br />
While these patients appear to be resistant to EGFR TKIs<br />
249<br />
such as erlotinib and gefitinib, the small molecule tyrosine<br />
kinase inhibitor crizotinib has shown activity against cell lines<br />
containing the EML4-ALK fusion oncogene. A Phase II trial<br />
of NSCLC patients who harbored EML4-ALK demonstrated<br />
a radiographic response rate of 57% and a disease control rate<br />
of 87% at eight weeks after receiving crizotinib 250 mg twice<br />
daily. Progression free survival at six months had an estimated<br />
probability of 72%. These results have led to a phase III trial<br />
comparing crioztinib to standard, single-agent docetaxel or<br />
pemetrexed in EML4-ALK positive NSCLC patients with<br />
metastatic disease who have received one prior line of chemotherapy<br />
(NCT00932893).<br />
EGFR<br />
Several studies have shown that EGFR over-expression, as<br />
determined by immunohistochemistry, appears to confer<br />
a poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. However, these<br />
results have not been confirmed in other studies. Given the<br />
conflicting data that are currently available, EGFR does not<br />
have a clear role as a prognostic marker in NSCLCs. With the<br />
recent advances in the development of EGFR-targeted therapy,<br />
however, it has become increasingly important to define<br />
predictive markers that identify a subset of patients who are<br />
most likely to benefit from EGFR-TKI therapy. Since particular<br />
subtypes of NSCLC (squamous carcinomas, mucinous adenocarcinomas)<br />
do not usually harbor EGFR mutations, these<br />
histological subtypes can be defines as predictive, especially<br />
when validated by refined immunohistochemical profiles.<br />
FGFR1<br />
Non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line harboring focal amplification<br />
of FGFR1 is dependent on FGFR1 activity for<br />
cell growth, as treatment of this cell line either with FGFR1specific<br />
shRNAs or with FGFR small molecule enzymatic<br />
inhibitors leads to cell growth inhibition. A significant subset<br />
of squamous cell lung cancer usually show gains of FGFR-1.<br />
3q<br />
Squamous cell lung carcinoma usually show 3q gains and is<br />
a sensitive marker of squamous cell differentiation. The locus<br />
specific 3q region harbours several targeted genes and may<br />
show promising value as predictiveness to new inhibitors.<br />
Fattori predittivi morfo-molecolari nel<br />
carcinoma renale<br />
G. Martignoni, M. Brunelli, D. Segala<br />
Università di Verona, Dipartimento di Patologia e Diagnostica, Verona<br />
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for about 3% of all new<br />
cancer cases and the incidence rates for all stages have been<br />
steadily rising over the last three decades. Approximately<br />
one-third of patients present with metastatic disease at the<br />
initial diagnosis and more than 40% of patients will eventually<br />
die from their cancer. Despite the introduction of new treatment<br />
regimens, surgical resection remains the only curative<br />
therapy for RCC. However, up to 50% of patients undergoing<br />
nephrectomy for clinically localized RCC will develop local<br />
recurrence or distant metastasis.<br />
RCC comprises a heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors<br />
with various cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities and different<br />
histological features. The taxonomy of renal epithelial<br />
neoplasms has evolved greatly over the past two decades.<br />
Landmark consensus conferences held in Heidelberg (1996)<br />
and Rochester (1997) laid the foundations for our modern<br />
classification system. Detailed morphological studies incorporating<br />
contemporary immunohistochemical and molecular