11.12.2012 Views

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

Sabato 27 ottobre 2012 - Pacini Editore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220<br />

ciation of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society<br />

of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology (SIAPEC-IAP).<br />

Following the publication of the guidelines, the scientific<br />

societies started an educational program with presentation<br />

and discussion of the guidelines in several national meetings.<br />

AIOM and SIAPEC also organized an external quality assurance<br />

(EQA) program for EGFR testing that revealed that<br />

EGFR mutation analysis is performed with good quality in<br />

the majority of Italian laboratories. The activity of AIOM and<br />

SIAPEC has significantly contributed to improve EGFR testing<br />

and, more generally, molecular pathology in Italy.<br />

references<br />

1 Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, et al. Epidermal growth factor<br />

receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:169-81.<br />

2 Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, et al. Epidermal growth factor<br />

receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene 2006;366:2-16.<br />

3 Marchetti A, Normanno N. Recommendations for mutational analysis<br />

of EGFR in lung carcinoma. Pathologica 2010;102:119-26.<br />

ALK: how and when<br />

A. Marchetti<br />

Center of Predictive Molecular Medicine, Center of Excellence on<br />

Aging, University-Foundation, Chieti, Italy<br />

Genetic lesions that drive the proliferation of cancer cells,<br />

known as driver mutations, can make specific tumors sensitive<br />

to therapeutic inhibitors targeting the mutated pathways.<br />

Several target-based therapies are now available for which<br />

treatment optimization is based on tumor testing for specific<br />

mutations and direct therapies against the mutant target. In<br />

patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inhibitors<br />

of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as<br />

gefitinib or erlotinib, have produced consistent responses in a<br />

subset of cases carrying activating EGFR mutations 1-3 .<br />

More recently, similarly positive outcomes have been reported<br />

for crizotinib in NSCLCs with rearrangement of the<br />

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. ALK gene rearrangements<br />

were described for the first time in 2007 as small<br />

inversions on chromosome 2p inducing a fusion of parts of<br />

the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)<br />

gene with parts of the ALK gene in NSCLC. The resulting fusion<br />

protein (EML4–ALK), with kinase activity, conferred a<br />

strong proliferative stimulus on the cells. 4,5<br />

Activating mutations or translocations of ALK have been<br />

identified in other types of cancer, including anaplastic largecell<br />

lymphoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, and<br />

paediatric neuroblastoma. 6-8<br />

Multiple distinct EML4-ALK chimeric variants have been<br />

identified, representing breakpoints within various EML4<br />

exons, all of which are transforming in vitro 9,10 .<br />

ALK rearrangement is present in 2-7% of NSCLC cases and it<br />

is associated with distinct clinicopathological features, including<br />

young age of onset, absent or minimal smoking history,<br />

and adenocarcinoma histology 4 10 11-17 .<br />

ALK rearrangements are in general mutually exclusive with<br />

EGFR and KRAS mutations 18 , consistent with the notion<br />

that ALK rearrangement defines a unique molecular subset<br />

of NSCLC.<br />

Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that cancer cells<br />

harbouring EML4–ALK and other ALK abnormalities are<br />

exquisitely sensitive to ALK inhibitors 11 19 .<br />

Crizotinib (PF-02341066; Pfizer) is a selective oral tyrosine<br />

kinase inhibitor of ALK and MET, which inhibits the tyrosine<br />

phosphorylation of ALK 20 21 .<br />

CONGRESSO aNNualE di aNatOmia patOlOGiCa SiapEC – iap • fiRENzE, 25-<strong>27</strong> OttOBRE <strong>2012</strong><br />

In a phase I clinical trial the toxicity profile and the efficacy of<br />

crizotinib were evaluated in a cohort of patients with NSCLC and<br />

ALK rearrangement 22 . The study data were recently updated.<br />

These data led to the accelerated approval of crizotinib, by<br />

the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States<br />

on 26 August 2011, for the treatment of NSCLC patients in a<br />

locally advanced or metastatic state, who are positive for ALK<br />

rearrangement. The use of crizotinib is restricted to patients<br />

whose tumors result positive to ALK alteration from a test<br />

approved by the FDA (currently the Abbott Vysis ALK Break<br />

Apart FISH Probe Kit, Abbott Molecular Inc., IL, USA) 23 .<br />

On 17 August 2011 the European Medicines Agency (EMEA)<br />

in Europe accepted the regulatory submission of crizotinib for<br />

the treatments of patients with advanced stage, ALK-positive,<br />

pretreated NSCLC.<br />

The analysis of molecular changes of ALK is necessary in order<br />

to choose the best therapeutic strategy in selected NSCLC<br />

patients in stages IIIB and IV which, in the presence of gene<br />

rearrangements, may benefit from treatment with ALK inhibitors.<br />

The ALK test is indicated in NSCLC patients with<br />

histotypes of adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, mixed<br />

tumors with adenocarcinoma, or not otherwise specified<br />

(NOS) NSCLC, which present the highest probability of gene<br />

rearrangements. On the basis of current knowledge, the determination<br />

of ALK alterations may be conducted on a surgical<br />

specimen, or biopsy or cytological samples of the primary<br />

tumor and/or of metastases.<br />

In order to guide therapeutic decisions in NSCLC patients the<br />

genetic analysis of ALK runs alongside EGFR gene mutation<br />

research 24 25 . Various technologies have been developed in<br />

order to study this marker.<br />

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the<br />

elective method for the analysis of ALK gene rearrangements.<br />

This method was in fact used in the clinical trials which led<br />

to the approval for treatment with crizotinib. The current diagnostic-therapeutic<br />

protocol sets a cut-off of 15% rearranged<br />

nuclei to consider a case as “positive” and the patient as a<br />

candidate for treatment. The technology is available in commercial<br />

kits developed for diagnostic use, among which is the<br />

diagnostic kit certified by the FDA, Abbott Vysis (ALK Break<br />

Apart FISH Probe Kit, Abbott Molecular, Inc.). Other commercial<br />

kits are available which are not yet FDA-approved<br />

(e.g. ZytoLight®SPEC ALK/EML4 TriCheckProbe, Zyto-<br />

Vision, Bremerhafen, Germany).<br />

The expression of ALK protein could represent a potential<br />

marker indicating gene rearrangement and/or response to<br />

ALK inhibitors. Introducing a user-friendly and cost-friendly<br />

screening method such as immunostaining, into anatomic<br />

pathology laboratories, is highly desirable. To this end, three<br />

monoclonal antibodies have been developed for research purposes<br />

and reported in the literature, clone 5A4 (Leica/Novocastra,<br />

and prediluted Abcam), clone ALK1 (Dako) and clone<br />

D5F3 (Cell Signaling Technology). Results obtained with<br />

these antibodies in comparative studies using the FISH method<br />

are promising, particularly those obtained with clone 5A4<br />

which recognizes a recombinant protein. However, results are<br />

insufficient to draw definitive conclusions at this time.<br />

RT-PCR can be performed on complementary DNA (cDNA)<br />

obtained by messenger RNA (mRNA) synthesis to highlight<br />

directly the process of fusion of ALK with EML4 or other<br />

proteins, using dedicated primers. The technology is extremely<br />

sensitive and highly specific. Nonetheless, RT-PCR has<br />

numerous disadvantages in its application to clinical practice.<br />

Further clinical studies devoted to the identification of the best<br />

technical procedures required are needed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!