Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

history of the digprograms getlocked int randosnoifo noitaunitnoc thgia.
retupmoC .sremmargorp gnipmulrof noitacifit. gnipmul rof noitacifi sa
tra fo tpecnoc deniaall or at least nosoftone. defines as a medium new
media art''. Theot evah ylnosnoitcurtsnelur eht fo. snoitatimil fI .emit
ralucitrap a tinstruments inan emerginstruments in an emer. receivers
which thems.dibieht mrofsnarthcihw sec lacidem lortnoc ro stwere.
invented then o virtue thatcomputers caneewteb rehto eht no seti
smhtirogla. ro sno .asreprogrtismhtirogla ro sno .asreprogrzeros and
ones the Lati. noemata. Tuesday February. overt ones. day and night
aren't we supposed to sleep half the time that we sleepone. third is our
own excess of rationality. how do theology account forsleep. novalis
fragment we finally should rid of sleeping. kind of rootbut what's. deep
about dark nothing and what's deep about nothing it'snot that light.
grows out of dark though goethe might have believed so.that might give
a clue. he's experiencing it through his tree so thatit seems rooted might
shed light. on the primal tree idea. the treesupposedly from 'wood' not
monad dyad. tryad. how is romanticism likea tree one to three one is
one and nothing can. be said two are atwar three are rooted the two are
one. bosons in gauge. theory bearersof the force integer spin while
fermion matter have fraction. spin.you could say these are
romanticclassical divide. problems are pushedinto. the romantic until
later. let's see particles and thennecessarily a force. between particles
ok and these forces are yesparticles forcecarrying. particles oh they
'carry' the 'force' hownice in their rucksack you could. also see it from
the particlewavedyad. if it's not interfered with it's. romantic having
interferenceand if it's interfered with it's classical. having no
interference. sothe interference is one place or the other in. 'nature' or
in 'science'in the romantic process or the classic formula. the. bosons
areinterfering bozos the interference not obeying the.
exclusionprinciple (related to 'particle' in a sense) like the clown is.
areplay a primal glue forcecarrying particle two in one thetravesty. the.
clown is constantly fixed constanted an integerfractioned into matter
spin.. we see it the other way the romantic is amess a forceparticle
buffoonery. what could possibly come out of itoh just matter.overtones
it's like nature. is counting ... foreverything it's counting up if one. then
infinite weakening but stillcounting. because of air interference in a.
medium why should nature becounting the overtones would all be
fractions. what about irrationalnumbers i once heard music based on
primes it's very. noisy only primeovertones. where exactly does the
irrational come in i know. thediagonal of the square what becomes of
202