Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

autological Something selfdescribing not being selfdescribing Yes.
because we don't always know when something is selfdescriptive or
not.. If someone points it out to me I would know but I don't know if
someone. always will point it out probably not so I can't say. This is
about the. gap between a word and its definition of subsuming a token
under a type.. How would I know 'autological' fits under autological
Because it's self. describing But I don't know that it's what I'm trying
to find out by. subsuming I would create the answer but not find it. I
know what self. describing is when I see it but I don't know if
'autological' is self. describing. Autological means selfdescribing but I
don't know if. 'autological' is autological. What it comes down to is
that it's not. clear what 'selfdescribing' is. I know it when I see it but
not more. than that. So I couldn't say that 'autological' is selfdescribing
even. if autological means selfdescribing. That's pretty clear after all.
If. someone calls himself 'Peter' it doesn't mean it's Peter. And
likewise I. know Peter when I see him not by his describing. If I knew
Peter by his. DNA I would know his describing very well. I think the
flaw here is. buried in the term 'selfdescribing'. It's a loop that is
everything and. nothing it rather belongs to the heterological. In a sense
everything is. selfdescribing because every word is linked to other
words and you can. take a short tour or long far fetched and get back
which would be. selfdescribing. So selfdescribing is selfinscribing
that's probably. the gist of it. And if I said 'autological' was autological
it would be. inscribing not describing.. colour charset. would it be
easier to read colours than forms colours are more immediate.
percepted and gestalted as wholes pictures etc on the other hand maybe
more. difficult with positions ambiguous colorspace versus distinct
forms etc. maybe. an artpoetic language also since the form is freed
characters are in the. colours only. how does it relate to eg. chinese the
pictorial in colour you. could write a word as a figureicon of
colorsinsequence ie. circles inside. each other clockwise or maybe even
as a unique merge.. check that something is unique that could never be
done. posting anything is mostly a very conscious effort and thereby
attain. the falsities also by being brought into a context of exchange. I
always react to that with iconoclasting withdrawals. communication
stereotypes it's hard not to and fix the two sides. make meaning implies
those classes but too much of since. communication needs response (it
thinks) and thereby shrinks to the. already and stereotype before it
transmits so well the poetics is. not type before you type (typetype) but
touch while do.. efa.
295