13.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unpleasant. in appearance untrust worthy in its results science has<br />

ceased to. be an ally of the anarchist and has become a problem. Should<br />

he. abandon it Should he use it What should he do with it That is. the<br />

question. Epistemological anarchism gives an answer to this. question.<br />

It is in line with the remaining tenets of anarchism and it. removes the<br />

last hardened elements.. Epistemological anarchism differs both from<br />

scepticism and from. political (religious) anarchism. While the sceptic<br />

either regards. every view as equally good or as equally bad or desists<br />

from making. such judgements altogether the epistemological anarchist<br />

has no. compunction to defend the most trite or the most outrageous.<br />

statement. While the political or the religious anarchist wants to.<br />

remove a certain form of life the epistemological anarchist may want.<br />

defend it for he has no everlasting loyalty to and no. everlasting<br />

aversion against any institution or any ideology. Like. the Dadaist<br />

whom he resembles much more than he resembles the. political<br />

anarchist he 'not only has no programme he is against. all programmes'<br />

though he will on occasions be the most vociferous. defender of the<br />

status quo or of his opponents 'to be a true. Dadaist one must also be an<br />

antiDadaist'. His aims remain stable. or change as a result of argument<br />

or of boredom or of a conversion. experience or to impress a mistress<br />

and so on. Given some aim he. may try to approach it with the help of<br />

organized groups or alone. he may use reason emotion ridicule an<br />

'attitude of serious. concern and whatever other means have been<br />

invented by humans to get. the better of their fellow men. His favourite<br />

pastime is to confuse. rationalists by inventing compelling reasons for<br />

unreasonable. doctrines. There is no view however 'absurd' or<br />

'immoral' he. refuses to consider or to act upon and no method is<br />

regarded as. indispensable. The one thing he opposes positively and<br />

absolutely are. universal standards universal laws universal ideas such.<br />

as 'Truth '<strong>Re</strong>ason 'Justice' 'Love' and the behaviour they bring. along<br />

though he does not deny that it is often good policy to act as. if such<br />

laws (such standards such ideas) existed and as if he. believed in them.<br />

He may approach the religious anarchist in his. opposition to science<br />

and the material world he may outdo any Nobel. Prize winner in his<br />

vigorous defence of scientific purity. He has no. objection to regarding<br />

the fabric of the world as described by. science and revealed by his<br />

senses as a chimera that either conceals. a deeper and perhaps spiritual<br />

reality or as a mere web of dreams. that reveals and conceals nothing.<br />

He takes great interest in. procedures phenomena and experiences such<br />

as those reported by. Carlos Castaneda which indicate that perceptions<br />

840

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!