13.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

stoomoving still rain smasspace the listening. pa anywhere smashing<br />

likestandards double. standaeefacfbcbacddaefdedunderstand language<br />

som. will cloud lighteninleaving all this nonsmaybe it's like an arro.<br />

insideoutside the awhich it is if it is ohg lbh xabj gur jbeyq the. tree<br />

how do i not which it is if it is theattracting like beauty.. <strong>Re</strong> question re<br />

de pre codewurx. About code and codework though not a direct<br />

response. I see code generally tied to the western project of science and<br />

culture. unravelling nature's code turning it into culture and technology.<br />

This. has no real basis any longer science has already made us<br />

transparent. we know code is nothing and that there aren't any secrets.<br />

So there's no. basis still code is everywhere all the more since it's not<br />

tied to. anything any longer doesn't refer to anything more real or more<br />

true. it's able to infect our lives more like a freefloating entity from the.<br />

layers of reality. If we have layers of reality we have codes. If. reality is<br />

one there's no code but our sense of reality is not one. If. you could live<br />

in one there would be no code and it would be the heavens. of the<br />

mystical. The mystical is tied to code but we know there's no. mystery.<br />

Inside yourself you're a mystery that's it. Walking through. yourself<br />

you're code. These are all layers of nothing. We know that if.<br />

something is code then it's nothing that's almost the proof of it.. Then<br />

there's the doubleness of code of inside and outside the. communication<br />

machinery of input and output between layers codesubject. and<br />

codeobject. There's no fundamental basis for the codes only the.<br />

subjectobject which moves around freely. When I'm using code it's a.<br />

reflection of the codedness of culture the structural complexities of.<br />

information and communication layers of reality which are always<br />

there. a reflection of culture as construction traversing it's layers which.<br />

means insideout backwards reverse the twofaced. In my work I'm not.<br />

using code in a fundamental way it's code without any basis diffusion.<br />

of code double and nothing of codes. Codes are still fascinating we.<br />

need something to do as humans I quite sure we're genetically geared.<br />

towards these things problemsolving directedness of attention.<br />

informationchurning. Still we have no mysteries only the codes and.<br />

they're not real only a kind of art beauty of codes what we're made. of<br />

still no mystery only reality. Codes real but not real that's. also the<br />

doubleness what we mean with subject and object they're both. real but<br />

not real to each other if the subject is real the object is. unreal and vice<br />

versa. These two could be stated as a classical and a. romantic notion of<br />

code the romantic code refers to something beyond. as its reality<br />

(nothing) while the classical code to its construction. (double).. I know<br />

305

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!