Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

integer spin while fermion matter have fraction spin.. you could say
these are romanticclassical divide. problems are pushed. into the
romantic until later. let's see particles and then. necessarily a force
between particles ok and these forces are yes. particles forcecarrying
particles oh they 'carry' the 'force' how. nice in their rucksack you
could also see it from the particlewave. dyad. if it's not interfered with
it's romantic having interference. and if it's interfered with it's classical
having no interference. so. the interference is one place or the other in
'nature' or in 'science'. in the romantic process or the classic formula.
the bosons are. interfering bozos the interference not obeying the
exclusion. principle (related to 'particle' in a sense) like the clown is a.
replay a primal glue forcecarrying particle two in one the. travesty. the
clown is constantly fixed constanted an integer. fractioned into matter
spin. we see it the other way the romantic is a. mess a forceparticle
buffoonery what could possibly come out of it. oh just matter..
overtones it's like nature is counting ... for. everything it's counting up
if one then infinite weakening but still. counting. because of air
interference in a medium why should nature be. counting the overtones
would all be fractions what about irrational. numbers i once heard
music based on primes it's very noisy only prime. overtones. where
exactly does the irrational come in i know the. diagonal of the square
what becomes of the diagonal in e.g. overtones. if you had an irrational
chord it would sound forever or not sound how. could it sound to create
a diagonal in music would you need another. dimension is the diagonal
another dimension it's a travesty we're. back to that. you could also
form a triangle that's not irrational but. it's a relation between three
that's possibly irrational. do you need. three how's the square a three
the two sides are irrational but the. square is rational how is that kind of
inverted direction the. rational is build from the irrational adding
dimension. we're used to. view it in the other direction. this all
digresses no way back it's. broken. what was the riddle 'cat eats
dogfood but the bowl is broken'. Re genesis genesis redux revisited. the
redux is somewhat like numbers into primes monotheism of number.
theory.. mpalmer What about the fact that you strip all words of case
and. punctuation. in this view i guess because they're whole numbers
like words treated. within an essensial ontology as original atomic..
..the redux can't be done on character level as analogy to. factorization
of numbers since almost every word is nonprime 'i' is a. prime etc..
..for words everything is blurred out if you try to assign a value to a.
word and do the redux mathematical arbitrary result.. ..if concepts
301