Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

working in that loophole it's a vertical chasm and crisis in the more.
horisontal networks of significations. In short then the sign is open and.
codework is wryting it.. In relation to what I called code and its double
the double would be the. vertical plane (chasm shadow code) to the
horisontal plane (surface. figure double). Yes I inverted that on purpose
in a way the double is the. residue which is the sign a mere product a
doubling of the code which is. the shadow. The sign is virtual a
doublenature of expression and content. which is never complete and
the code is the stuff making up the chasm between. and also making the
sign (code then is the virtuality of the sign) as all. signs are coded and
can not be decoded or the sign would be like nothing.. In another view
the sign is the double and the code is nothing the sign is. something
while code is nothing which would be both's virtuality and. signifiance.
In reality it is opposite sign is nothing and code is. everything which is
their practice.. So maybe it turns out that 'code and its double' and
'code as nothing' fit with. Kristeva's 'signifiance' and 'practice' of
'text'. signifiance double. virtuality of code (code is doubled into sign)
and practice nothing reality. of code (sign is 'doubled' into nothing
reversed) maybe what Charles Baldwin. called the doubleness's
double.. And what about the analogy of brain asymmetry in this It
would simplify to the. left hemisphere doing significations and the right
doing practice. The. sinisters are revolutionary in Kristeva's sense ) The
signifiance of the. left's symbolmachine's unlimited and unbounded
generating process through. language and the heterogeneous process of
the right is a structuring. practice a passage to the outer boundaries of
the subject and society. The. timespacebias of leftright would be the
unceasing operations of running. code (time) becoming a practice a
transformation of natural and social. linguistics limitations stagnations
(space). Maybe pushing the analogy too. hard but the asymmetry
suggests a slightly different processing or texting. into
signifiancecoding maybe extrapolating that the right is more.
codedmattered and the left more signifieddialectical. And so on ad.
absurdum.. Did I understand this Well it was written
(signifiancepractice).. Btw Eco wasn't mentioned in the Art in Theory
book well neither was Peirce. so they're more into linguistic and
language philosophy while Kristeva's. rhetoric into art and the
revolutionary side which could be another way of. stating the notion of
'art' as the chasms of 'culture'.. Bjorn. distributed via no commercial
use without permission. is a moderated mailing list for net criticism.
collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets. more info
62