Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

consume them. A hylomorphism is a. fold. after an unfold generating
then consuming a virtual data structure. A. metamorphism. is the
opposite composition an unfold after a fold typically it will convert. one
data. representation to another. In general metamorphisms are less
interesting than. hylomorphisms. there is no automatic fusion to
deforest the intermediate virtual data. structure.. However under.
certain conditions fusion is possible some of the work of the unfold can
be. done. before all. of the work of the fold is complete. This permits
streaming metamorphisms and. among. other. things allows conversion
of infinite data representations. This is why an. aphorism is. a false.
way of philosophic expression. Alone even doing nothing you do not
waste your. time.. You do almost always in company. No encounter
with yourself can be altogether. sterile. Something necessarily emerges
even if only the hope of some day meeting. yourself. again.. We have
convictions only if we have studied nothing thoroughly. All.
indignationfrom. grousing to satanismmarks a point in mental
evolution. It is as an informer. that I. have. prowled around God
incapable of imploring Him I have spied on Him. Let us not. be.
needlessly bitter certain failures are sometimes fruitful. An aphorism is.
something. cut off. And Consists of the elimination of its real
connections. When I utter an. aphorism. I never say why I think what I
am saying or what is the justification of what. I. am. saying.. Therefore
the aphorist departs from the road of the philosopher as a. justified.
visionary. amd takes the road of the rustic oracle the country warbler
the dreamer who. the. hillfolk. found mumbling and tied up into a tree
so as to protect their flocks. The. oracle is. a kind of rogue peripheral or
a lolling hole floating through the matrix.. Thinking. cannot. procede
aphoristically. The role of the central or original metaphor is simply. to.
trigger. (the French would say declancher) the whole set of connected
metaphors that. come. mind so I can follow the whole series of them
into reality as suchness. And. as. such. Labyrinths are different from
mazes. Labyrinths are unicursal. They have one. well. defined. path that
leads us into the center and back out again. There are no tricks to. it no.
dead ends. or culdesacs no intersecting paths. The idea of the Absolute
in Hegel. The. eidos. in Plato.. The cogito in Descartes I and my
circumstance the celestial emporium of. benevolent. recognitions.. so
do the labyrinth metaphor correspond more to the algoritmic of code.
while the. maze more to the heuristic and then the loosely backward
dancing eurytmic. to. the. spiral. be continued tomorrow.... Re
culturejammers A simulated hold up. hehe du kan jo prøve ). synes det
82