Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

though in a clean dual. cut. In other notions of code it's not so clean and
for eg. sort(x) we. don't call it a decode it's codecode but what is
decode It's. ambivalent.. 'life is decoded into dna' or rather 'coded' do
we mean the. output in general the object and for something to have a
decoding means. have a systemic interpretation but this goes both ways
what is the. code can also be the decode to emphasize they're
activepassive roles of. interpretation.. and code the system of
interpretation the structure of. how the active and passive roles will take
place of instructiondata. subjectobject.. Certainly there are levels of
code in the construction of nature and. ourselves but at the bottom we
don't know or we know that it's not. discreet like the particlewave
duality.. But dna is discrete for that matter the particlewave duality is
just. that a duality even with probabilistic measurement the mathesis
behind. it is exact.... Exact probabilistic if you have a perfect random
number generator could. it have a code This is like asking for the
formula for prime numbers. could we say there are codes for prime
numbers but not a formula working. a certain degree and in general that
code is related to formula in a. special way is it a working formula
applied which is the dual again of. form and reality living formulas.
Seems I'm treating it as formula here. and you matter and since
everything is mattered and chunkeddiscreet it's. coded but in the formal
end.. How deep do the codes go all the way you'd. say since it's rooted
mattered dirty having the real part maybe it's. not a fruitful discussion
where it ends or begins some highly energic. thing expanded and
collapsed symmetry collaped into code.. Yes but we've figured out
things to a large degree what we're made of. our history and destiny
there doesn't seem to be any mystery about it. how we're created
though we can't reproduce it though have the. knowledge to destroy it a
devastating knowledge in itself.. Considering the fact that dark matter
the majority in the universe isn't. accounted for at all that the
mechanism of memory isn't understood etc.. I don't see how you can
say this. In fact one can as Brillouin did. years ago argue for the
opposite that the mystery is somewhat dependent. on the limmits of our
economics and simply keeps getting pushed back as. for example more
and more powerful accelerators are built.... Yes mystery is something
pushedback in relation to something that's. takingplace it's still a
subjectobject 'economy' ecodomy the economy. of code mystery is in
the subject via the code interpretation it gets. objectified real as
takingplace. Still it's an economy not a mystery. it's just what's
emphasized. From the other end you could say memory is. there and
307