Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

worth a tryjust. find out.hm yes let's do that also some books entirely
virtual not in. stock very obscure maybe like borges' imaginary books.
keep this in mind as. other kinds of net.books.....i uploaded a lot of new
chapters to the. noemata. Thursday January. email header art. email
header artnavn bruker domene tld navnbegrep referanse (en ting kan ha.
flere navn)axiomsto from cc fortid framtid cc kausalitet fratil (rules.
transitions)subject this play propositionbody discussion.
interpretationhead body codestructure face appearance cause. noemata.
Re codework (KristevaEco). long reply I just got back from aconf. with
messages I have to deal with. not spam. But if you look atKristeva's
Revolution in Poetic Language you'll see. a lengthy treatment
ofMaldoror especially the unabridged Fr. version and a. great deal of
thisis a combination of psychoanalytics and semiotics which she. You'd
have to look at the book it's hardly reductionist. Same with. Greimas
etc. Alan I have read it and I find Eco and all such semiotic. models of
language reductionist. Where does a text like Lautreamont's. Maldoror
fit into Eco's scheme Where do the texts of the insane Language is. not
only aboutsignals (Eco's signfunctions) and their corresponding.
behavioral responses.There is a form of dark matter in language that
never. gets touched upon by semiotics. It is where signals get crossed
elided. broken down and too often dismissed in semiotics as gibberish
or noise.. Eco's approach isgood for analyzing highclass linear
detective novels like. the ones he writes but it falls apart on texts that
don't make the rage of. interpretationtheir goal. Like all models of the
world semiotics fits some. things well and other things badly and the
things it fits badly happen t
374