13.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

prelinguistic presymbolic sense of self in which the mother of. the.<br />

Imaginary (feminine) and feelings associated with her are central and.<br />

compelling rather than peripheral and debased. These 'feelings' (bodily<br />

drives. rhythms pulsions pleasures bliss) are never lost and their<br />

memory is held. precariously in check by the patriarchal symbolic.<br />

They can be seen to rise to. the surface through cultural forms in<br />

different ways. For instance they have. been retrieved in readings of<br />

artistic work where their resisting quality may. be. 'accidental' e.g. in<br />

readings of the th century photographs of Julia. Margaret Cameron (see<br />

Mavor ) or the abstract works of Helen Frankenthaler. (Pollock ).<br />

Feminist cultural theorists have exposed the way in which. these.<br />

memories remain to 'trouble' patriarchy revealing how cultural<br />

practices and. stories (films rituals fairy tales myths) replay the moment<br />

of patriarchal. culture's formation in which the possibilities of<br />

'difference' are continually. abjected and repressed (Kristeva Creed<br />

Warner ).. Kristeva believes that the subject can gain access more<br />

readily to the. semiotic. chora through creative musical poetic practices<br />

or even just through vibrant. use of colour (Kristeva ). She sees these<br />

possibilities as already having. their origins in the semiotic chora<br />

recalling a more fluid plural and less. fixed perception of meaning and<br />

self which reactivates feelings lost in the. patriarchal 'rational'.<br />

However Kristeva also makes it clear that the. 'feminine' semiotic<br />

chora is not something outside or beyond language. She. states 'if the<br />

feminine exists it only exists in the order of significance or. signifying<br />

process and it is only in relation to meaning and signification.<br />

positioned as their excess or transgressive other that it exists speaks.<br />

thinks. (itself) and writes (itself) for both sexes'. Thus it is 'different or<br />

other in. relation to language and meaning but nevertheless only<br />

thinkable within the. symbolic' ().. presymbolic within symbolic<br />

framework. However as Kaplan notes 'the childadult never forgets the<br />

world of the. Imaginary and heshe continues to desire unconsciously<br />

the illusionary. oneness with the mother heshe experienced' (). It is this<br />

proposition. that the child clings to those heady pleasures of the 'bliss'<br />

of preOedipal. fusion with the mother that has been central to the<br />

development of a theory of. visual culture. Lacan believed that the child<br />

never forgets its illusionary. oneness with the mother or the 'jouissance'<br />

that this moment entailed a. moment. before the intervention of paternal<br />

law which requires both the control of. 'self' and the<br />

denigrationabjection of the feminine (mother) and the pleasures.<br />

associated with her emotions feelings love.. Briefly Lacan's reworking<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!