Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

EMail) means to. copy its content bitwise from one machine to another
and storing it. locally on the reader's and other machines (browser
cache EMail. folder proxy server etc.). In digital networks there is no.
difference between reading and distribution a fact which traditional.
copyright does not take into account.. Upton. The law concerns my
relationship to the author not the acts of an. electronic tool the actions
of which are my responsibility. Trying to terse the argument down
'copy' has a lot of meanings this. last notion of copyright might be
copy as verbal especially. . to hear or receive a radio message as over a
CB radio Do you. copy. . copy the mail CB Radio Slang. See mail (def.
).. Alternatively copyright as a right to leap from one context to
another. in open internet sea. . Also cocky. Newfoundland. to leap from
one ice pan to another. across open water.. A cite comes to mind maybe
leaping but. Hospitality represents a reciprocal ritualized and theatrical.
dimension. Whom are we to receive and how are we to receive them
What. rules should we follow here For we exists solely to be received
and to. receive (not to be known or recognized). This symbolic
dimension is. precisely what is missing from communication in which
the message is. merely decoded never given or received. The message
is passed but. there is no exchange between people. The abstract
dimension of meaning. is transmitted while the aspect of reciprocity is
shortcircuited. Irreconcilabillity Baudrillard.. Ours are the eternal
networks this message probably propagating. hundreds or thousands of
news servers and machines in seconds after. submit. Lots of readers...
No guarantee however that it'll ever 'copy'.. The notion of copyright as
exchange is not unproblematic of course you. could always
circumscribe insert an intermediate machine receiving and. forwarding
delaying relaying the exchange if you want to avoid it. and the
authorreceiver line might be machinic alltogether creating. nihilogues
which nobody either writes or reads. Yes but then do they. exist and
who cares Berkeley's 'esse est percipi' might relate since. there's no
fundamentals left only the perceiving receiving. Who is. perceiving the
nihilogues when nobody 'copy' And are their copyrights. being taken
care of by God in the eternal networks Being is perceiving. receiving
copyright a right to be. In short this copyright means the right to be
received not given. since it's already given and so as guest with due
hospitality in the. exchange like 'do you copy do we understand each
other' which also. amounts to a mess of course consensus of mess and
taking care of it.. Take care. K.. (btw legal name Kent MantiesEljot no
deception just a mess up of iso. charset and the eternal Panopticon gaze
50