13.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

information theory and theexamples Baldwin talked about or the.<br />

problems say of transmitter channel receiver with noise parasitic<br />

within. the process.Thanks for the discussion appreciate.Here there are<br />

several. levelscode as existentcode as processcode as procedurecode as.<br />

performativecode as selfregulating or checksumetc. etc.There's<br />

structure. of course and there are material or ideal strata andtheir<br />

interactions. Code. is perhaps a productive system of classificationthat<br />

admits closure.... AlanAdmits closure yes like it's its own end<br />

metaphysics and then real. asreference system like every reference<br />

system is real on its own. Maybe. I'mextrapolating too much but they<br />

might be points of departure at. noemata. Sunday March. <strong>Re</strong> question re<br />

de pre codewurx. About code and codework though not a direct<br />

response I see code generally tied. the western project of science and<br />

cultureunravelling nature's code turning. it into culture and technology.<br />

Thishas no real basis any longer science has. already made us<br />

transparentwe know code is nothing and that there aren't any. secrets.<br />

So there's nobasis still code is everywhere all the more since it's. not<br />

tied toanything any longer doesn't refer to anything more real or more.<br />

trueit's able to infect our lives more like a freefloating entity from.<br />

thelayers of reality. If we have layers of reality we have codes. Ifreality<br />

is. one there's no code but our sense of reality is not one. Ifyou could<br />

live in. one there would be no code and it would be the heavensof the<br />

mystical. The. mystical is tied to code but we know there's nomystery.<br />

Inside yourself you're. a mystery that's it. Walking throughyourself<br />

you're code. These are all layers. of nothing. We know that ifsomething<br />

is code then it's nothing that's almost. the proof of it.Then there's the<br />

doubleness of code of inside and outside. thecommunication machinery<br />

of input and output between layers codesubjectand. codeobject. There's<br />

no fundamental basis for the codes only thesubjectobject. which moves<br />

around freely. When I'm using code it's areflection of the codedness. of<br />

culture the structural complexities ofinformation and communication<br />

layers. of reality which are always therea reflection of culture as<br />

construction. traversing it's layers whichmeans insideout backwards<br />

reverse the. twofaced. In my work I'm notusing code in a fundamental<br />

way it's code without. any basis diffusionof code double and nothing of<br />

codes. Codes are still. fascinating weneed something to do as humans I<br />

quite sure we're genetically. gearedtowards these things<br />

problemsolving directedness of. attentioninformationchurning. Still we<br />

have no mysteries only the codes. andthey're not real only a kind of art<br />

beauty of codes what we're madeof. still no mystery only reality. Codes<br />

211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!