13.12.2012 Views

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the right is a structuring. practice a passage to the outer boundaries of<br />

the subject and society. The. timespacebias of leftright would be the<br />

unceasing operations of running. code (time) becoming a practice a<br />

transformation of natural and social. linguistics limitations stagnations<br />

(space). Maybe pushing the analogy too. hard but the asymmetry<br />

suggests a slightly different processing or texting. into<br />

signifiancecoding maybe extrapolating that the right is more.<br />

codedmattered and the left more signifieddialectical. And so on ad.<br />

absurdum.. Did I understand this Well it was written<br />

(signifiancepractice).. Btw Eco wasn't mentioned in the Art in Theory<br />

book well neither was Peirce. so they're more into linguistic and<br />

language philosophy while Kristeva's. rhetoric into art and the<br />

revolutionary side which could be another way of. stating the notion of<br />

'art' as the chasms of 'culture'.. Bjorn. distributed via no commercial<br />

use without permission. is a moderated mailing list for net criticism.<br />

collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets. more info<br />

majordomobbs.thing.net and info nettimel in the msg body. <strong>Re</strong><br />

codework (KristevaEco). language is the mechanism whereby you<br />

understand what i'm thinking better. than i do (where 'i' is defined by<br />

those changes for which i is required).. i an interface of signifiance over<br />

our shattered do (where i. mediates sign and fiance (which is double<br />

itself (signifiance (all parents. are married to their children (i am the<br />

priest (the conventional and virtual. (of the chasm (like every<br />

convention is exactly the chasm (that's why. (that's 'why' (what's that<br />

'why' (i (). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). <strong>Re</strong> Codework Eco Aquinas. Sandy<br />

Baldwin Thanks for a very interesting read it blows my mind to. see<br />

that the things are still the same and humbly that my simple. exposition<br />

of Eco's sign as paradoxical based only from Al's short. cites actually<br />

is traceable back to Aquinas (maybe cascading from actus. purus and<br />

prima materia finally).. In addition your article proves to me that a<br />

careful logic intuition. sparse material also can be enough to get into the<br />

core of things. without the proper acacemical frameworks in support.<br />

But that's the joy. of philosophy.. I'm grateful for all the connecting<br />

references I'm commenting short. some from my understanding of Eco<br />

posted earlier which might seem. cryptic without the frameworks for<br />

clarification and confirmation. Bjorn. Charles Baldwin. The inarticulate<br />

cry which seemed to be the voice of light. Hermes. Trismegistus. (the<br />

conventional and virtual (of the chasm (like every convention is.<br />

exactly the chasm))). <strong>Re</strong>fering to the convention of Eco's sign to.<br />

Kristeva's chasm.. The attraction of Aquinas was precisely the answer<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!