Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
part iii | cultural and spiritual development<br />
1. [It was] King Huvishka’s fourth year <strong>of</strong> reign, when …a city /land…<br />
The king presented(?) this sangha and (??) city…<br />
2. …this [that is, the sangha] was established by Shodiya and… …who<br />
put the temple in order/decorated.<br />
3. …The sanctuary(???) which the king named after Kanishka(?) and in<br />
addition Shodiya(?) had erected a large gate in the acropolis for the<br />
gods(?).<br />
4. …The flowing water/ was waterless(?) that is why Shodiya dug in (??).<br />
5. …Shodiya dug and both(?) deities(?) were brought/came.<br />
6. …And this was written by Mirozado on Shodiya’s orders.<br />
This is the first and most extensive monumental Bactrian inscription to have been<br />
discovered in Central <strong>Asia</strong>, and the first Bactrian inscription accompanying a<br />
sculpture. It is <strong>of</strong> major importance for understanding the creation and dating <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Airtam religious complex, and contributes to our knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Bactrian lexicon<br />
and its dialects. For example, a number <strong>of</strong> Bactrian words ending in an omicron in the<br />
Surkh-Kotal inscriptions are rendered with a final alpha in the Airtam inscription. It<br />
is possible that this is indicative <strong>of</strong> different Bactrian dialects spoken by people on<br />
the left and right banks <strong>of</strong> the Oxus river. Fragments <strong>of</strong> papyrus manuscripts found<br />
during excavations <strong>of</strong> Kampyrtepa, in a structure located in the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
site, are <strong>of</strong> particular interest for the study <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Bactrian written language.<br />
Fragments <strong>of</strong> manuscripts were unearthed from almost the entire area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
structure both under and in the rubble. Altogether about 30 fragments <strong>of</strong> various<br />
sizes (2.8×6 cm; 2.8×1 cm; 1.8×1.2 cm) were found, as well as several intact, thin<br />
sheets, stuck together and rolled up into a tube, which disintegrated into several<br />
fragments when they were removed. The sheets are approximately 15.0 cm wide and<br />
0.1–0.2 cm thick, with left margins <strong>of</strong> up to 1.5 cm. There are inscriptions on both<br />
sides in black ink, in straight lines <strong>of</strong> three to four or even more lines, with a line<br />
spacing <strong>of</strong> 2.0–2.5 cm and a letter height <strong>of</strong> 3.0–5.0 mm.<br />
The inscriptions are in cursive Bactrian script and the language is Bactrian. The<br />
word ABO appears on two fragments. This is either the preposition ‘in’, ‘on’, ‘at’ or<br />
the noun ‘water’. One fragment bears the word BIΔO ‘chief ’ (cf. the Bactrian word<br />
asbarobido for ‘chief <strong>of</strong> the cavalry’, which was found on a gemstone). The other<br />
fragment has remnants <strong>of</strong> words and prepositions but, on the whole, none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fragments provides a coherent text. The fragments <strong>of</strong> manuscripts found here date<br />
from the reign <strong>of</strong> Kanishka, i.e. the first half <strong>of</strong> the 2nd century AD.<br />
Bactrian manuscripts from Kushan times were unknown in Central <strong>Asia</strong> before<br />
the Kampyrtepa excavations. Palaeographic and archaeological data indicate that<br />
140