26.11.2021 Views

Lands of Asia layouts (Eng) 26.11.21

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

part ii | states<br />

site. Studies have shown that inscriptions on ostraca from Nisa reflect a system <strong>of</strong><br />

taxation <strong>of</strong> vineyards located around this first capital <strong>of</strong> the Arsacids in the 2nd–1st<br />

centuries BC. The inscriptions include the names <strong>of</strong> vineyards on which taxes were<br />

levied, such as Nakbakan, Natpak and Kashashi, as well as the word khum – the word<br />

for a large vessel used to store wine. Finally, the inscriptions detail the amount <strong>of</strong> tax,<br />

the year <strong>of</strong> payment and, most significantly, the name <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial who drew up the<br />

document, along with his title marubar, i.e. accountant.<br />

For example:<br />

1. ‘According to this receipt (?) from the vineyard due to be taxed … 10<br />

(?) khum were delivered. Vahuman, accountant. Paid for the year 141<br />

(or 140).’<br />

2. ‘According to this receipt (?) from the vineyard due to be taxed (?)<br />

(from the locality) called Htrk (?), 8 (or 7) vessels, paid for the year<br />

133 were delivered. Mihrdat, accountant (?).’<br />

A detailed study <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> the inscriptions on the ostraca from Nisa by<br />

the scholars M. Masson, I. Diakonov, M. Diakonov and V. Livshits led them to the<br />

following conclusions:<br />

1. The tax collected was recorded on a special document, a type <strong>of</strong> a tax<br />

receipt.<br />

2. There were two categories <strong>of</strong> land – taxable and non-taxable. The term<br />

(a)baz (cf. baz) was used to denote the land tax.<br />

3. The amount <strong>of</strong> tax paid was measured in large vessels called khum,<br />

which had a standard size and served as measures <strong>of</strong> capacity.<br />

4. The tax was not levied on any particular individual, but on the<br />

community, as indicated by the nature <strong>of</strong> the formula ‘delivered’.<br />

5. The collection <strong>of</strong> the tax involved strict record keeping by the state and<br />

the tax was paid annually.<br />

6. The person who collected or received the tax was an <strong>of</strong>ficial or<br />

accountant – a marubar or madubar (?).<br />

7. Taxes were delivered from the district to the administrative centre <strong>of</strong><br />

Mithradatkirt (Nisa).<br />

8. The ostraca were copies <strong>of</strong> the receipts kept in the revenue <strong>of</strong>fice, while<br />

the originals were given to the owners <strong>of</strong> the land or produce to avoid a<br />

repeat collection.<br />

9. Comparison <strong>of</strong> tax documents dating from similar periods but from<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!