26.11.2021 Views

Lands of Asia layouts (Eng) 26.11.21

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

part iv | migrations <strong>of</strong> cultures<br />

Large kime were as much as 20 metres or more in length, from bow to stern, more<br />

than 5-metres wide in the middle, and one metre high on the sides. Inside, the vessel<br />

was divided into compartments by beams laid across from one side to the other and<br />

fastened with strips <strong>of</strong> iron. There were two compartments for the boatmen (kaikchi<br />

or kimechi) on the stern and bow, and three more in the middle <strong>of</strong> the boat. The<br />

average kime was about five metres long and more than three metres wide. Large kime<br />

could carry up to 16–18 camels, or 18–20 horses, or 200 sheep or 700–800 poods<br />

(approximately 11.5–13 tonnes) <strong>of</strong> grain, while medium-sized kime could carry 10–<br />

12 camels, or 12–14 horses, or 150 sheep and up to 400 poods (6.5 tonnes) <strong>of</strong> grain.<br />

The kime were rowing vessels with no sails, steered by short, triangular, heavy oars.<br />

However, according to Bykov, the main means <strong>of</strong> propulsion were horses, tethered to<br />

beams on the vessel by rope.<br />

Two horses were usually used, one was tied to the front and one to the stern, on<br />

the side opposite to the current, so that the spine <strong>of</strong> the horse was 60–70 cm below<br />

the sides <strong>of</strong> the boat. In deep water, the horses would swim across, but in shallow<br />

water and on the shore they would pull the boat along while tethered to a strong rope<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> a harness and a shaft.<br />

As Bykov noted, this method <strong>of</strong> steering the vessel through shallow water and by<br />

land was exactly the same as the one used in Russia at the time.<br />

The kime was used not only to cross the river, but also to sail on it, as can be<br />

seen from the calculations provided by Bykov, according to which, with a tow rope,<br />

upstream, a kime could cover 25 versts (nearly 27 km) at most per day, while further<br />

down the river in deep water it would cover 80 versts (just over 85 km) per day, which<br />

was equivalent to a three- or four-day journey by land.<br />

Thus, a kime could cover the distance from Termez to Khorezm in 8–10 days.<br />

As a reconnaissance <strong>of</strong>ficer, Bykov was primarily interested in the use <strong>of</strong> these<br />

vessels for military purposes. According to his preliminary calculations, two large<br />

kime were needed to transport one company <strong>of</strong> infantry <strong>of</strong> no more than 160<br />

bayonets, without cargo.<br />

During the same period, two kinds <strong>of</strong> vessels were widely used in the lower<br />

reaches <strong>of</strong> the Amu Darya: kayuks and kemas. The scholar G.P. Snesarev has been<br />

able to provide us with some useful ethnographic details. The kemas were large, flatbottomed<br />

vessels propelled by both oars and sails, which were used for transporting<br />

agricultural produce, fabrics and other cargo. They sailed down the Amu Darya as far<br />

as the Aral Sea and up to Termez, while the journey from Khorezm (from Khanka) to<br />

Termez overland took a month.<br />

The crew <strong>of</strong> a large kema consisted <strong>of</strong> a captain (darga), his assistant (yarimdarga),<br />

who acted as helmsman, as well as fifteen sailors. They were all members <strong>of</strong> a<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!