You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
part iv | migrations <strong>of</strong> cultures<br />
Large kime were as much as 20 metres or more in length, from bow to stern, more<br />
than 5-metres wide in the middle, and one metre high on the sides. Inside, the vessel<br />
was divided into compartments by beams laid across from one side to the other and<br />
fastened with strips <strong>of</strong> iron. There were two compartments for the boatmen (kaikchi<br />
or kimechi) on the stern and bow, and three more in the middle <strong>of</strong> the boat. The<br />
average kime was about five metres long and more than three metres wide. Large kime<br />
could carry up to 16–18 camels, or 18–20 horses, or 200 sheep or 700–800 poods<br />
(approximately 11.5–13 tonnes) <strong>of</strong> grain, while medium-sized kime could carry 10–<br />
12 camels, or 12–14 horses, or 150 sheep and up to 400 poods (6.5 tonnes) <strong>of</strong> grain.<br />
The kime were rowing vessels with no sails, steered by short, triangular, heavy oars.<br />
However, according to Bykov, the main means <strong>of</strong> propulsion were horses, tethered to<br />
beams on the vessel by rope.<br />
Two horses were usually used, one was tied to the front and one to the stern, on<br />
the side opposite to the current, so that the spine <strong>of</strong> the horse was 60–70 cm below<br />
the sides <strong>of</strong> the boat. In deep water, the horses would swim across, but in shallow<br />
water and on the shore they would pull the boat along while tethered to a strong rope<br />
by means <strong>of</strong> a harness and a shaft.<br />
As Bykov noted, this method <strong>of</strong> steering the vessel through shallow water and by<br />
land was exactly the same as the one used in Russia at the time.<br />
The kime was used not only to cross the river, but also to sail on it, as can be<br />
seen from the calculations provided by Bykov, according to which, with a tow rope,<br />
upstream, a kime could cover 25 versts (nearly 27 km) at most per day, while further<br />
down the river in deep water it would cover 80 versts (just over 85 km) per day, which<br />
was equivalent to a three- or four-day journey by land.<br />
Thus, a kime could cover the distance from Termez to Khorezm in 8–10 days.<br />
As a reconnaissance <strong>of</strong>ficer, Bykov was primarily interested in the use <strong>of</strong> these<br />
vessels for military purposes. According to his preliminary calculations, two large<br />
kime were needed to transport one company <strong>of</strong> infantry <strong>of</strong> no more than 160<br />
bayonets, without cargo.<br />
During the same period, two kinds <strong>of</strong> vessels were widely used in the lower<br />
reaches <strong>of</strong> the Amu Darya: kayuks and kemas. The scholar G.P. Snesarev has been<br />
able to provide us with some useful ethnographic details. The kemas were large, flatbottomed<br />
vessels propelled by both oars and sails, which were used for transporting<br />
agricultural produce, fabrics and other cargo. They sailed down the Amu Darya as far<br />
as the Aral Sea and up to Termez, while the journey from Khorezm (from Khanka) to<br />
Termez overland took a month.<br />
The crew <strong>of</strong> a large kema consisted <strong>of</strong> a captain (darga), his assistant (yarimdarga),<br />
who acted as helmsman, as well as fifteen sailors. They were all members <strong>of</strong> a<br />
240