29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 J.P. Latgé <strong>and</strong> R. Calderone<br />

(Lesage et al. 2004); the third one being a putative<br />

transporter (H. Bussey, personal communication).<br />

Neither the single FKS1 or FKS2 disruptions was<br />

lethal. In contrast to yeasts, all filamentous Ascomycete<br />

moulds sequenced to date have one FKS<br />

orthologue. In A. fumigatus, FKS1 is unique <strong>and</strong><br />

essential, as shown in a diploid background after<br />

haploidization following transformation (Firon<br />

et al. 2002) or by RNAi (Mouyna et al. 2004). In S.<br />

pombe,fourgenesBGS1-4 sharing homology with<br />

β1,3-GS catalytic subunits have been identified. Of<br />

these, Cps1p/Bgs1p is an essential gene presumably<br />

involved in the assembly of the septum β1,3<br />

glucan (Ishiguro et al. 1997). Bgs1p is localised to<br />

the cell division site in a manner dependent on<br />

the actomyosin ring <strong>and</strong> the septation-inducing<br />

network (Liu et al. 1999). In addition, Bgs1p has<br />

been localised to the site of growth (Cortes et al.<br />

2002; Liu et al. 2002). Bgs2p is a sporulationspecific<br />

GS required for proper ascospore wall<br />

maturation (Liu et al. 2000; Martin et al. 2000).<br />

bgs2Δ sporulating diploids show a defect in GS<br />

activity <strong>and</strong> fail to assemble the cell wall properly,<br />

resulting in a failure to develop viable ascospores.<br />

bgs3 <strong>and</strong> bgs 4 are essential for cell growth (Martin<br />

et al. 2003; Ribas, unpublished data). Bgs3p cannot<br />

be substituted by overproduction of any of the<br />

other GS homologues, suggesting a unique role for<br />

Bgs3p in the biosynthesis of β1,3 glucans where<br />

new cell wall deposition is necessary. Like Bgs3p,<br />

Bgs4p localises to the growing pole <strong>and</strong> septum.<br />

Although β1,3-GS isoforms perform a distinct<br />

function,itisalsopossiblethatalltheseisoforms<br />

have overlapping roles in cell wall assembly, as in<br />

S. cerevisiae.<br />

Genome surveys show that the FKS genes are<br />

reasonably well conserved across all fungal genera.<br />

Homologues of FKS1 have been found in all fungi.<br />

Hydropathy analysis of the large protein encoded<br />

by all FKS family members predicts a localisation<br />

within the plasma membrane, with as many as 16<br />

transmembrane helices. A central hydrophilic domain<br />

of about 580 amino acids displays a remarkable<br />

degree of identity (> 80%) among all known<br />

FKS protein sequences (Douglas 2001). It has been<br />

proposed that this region is located on the cytoplasmic<br />

face of the plasma membrane <strong>and</strong> must have<br />

some essential, conserved function. Two aspartate<br />

residues at positions D392 <strong>and</strong> D441 in this region<br />

have been recognized as essential for function of<br />

the glucan synthase (Douglas 2001). If members<br />

of the Fks family of proteins provide the catalytic<br />

centre of β1,3 glucan synthase, then they represent<br />

a significant divergence from known glycosyltransferases<br />

which use a nucleotide-diphospho (NDP)sugarasasubstrate.NeitheroftwoproposedUDPglucose<br />

binding sites, (R/K)XGG implicated from<br />

glycogen synthases <strong>and</strong> D,D,D35QXXRW from hydrophobic<br />

cluster analysis, is found in Fks1p (Douglas<br />

2001). The gaps in our knowledge of the β1,3glucan<br />

synthase mechanism raise many questions.<br />

In the absence of purification to homogeneity of the<br />

enzyme, the first provocative question is whether<br />

Fks1p is the true catalytic subunit of the glucan<br />

synthase or only one of the members of the glucan<br />

synthase complex. Other key questions are similar<br />

to the ones which can be asked for chitin synthesis:<br />

can synthesis be initiated de novo, or does<br />

it require a glucan acceptor? Does polymerisation<br />

proceed from the non-reducing end of the growing<br />

chain? Are glucose residues added as monomers or<br />

as disaccharide units?<br />

b) Regulation<br />

Rho1p-GTPase, which controls β1,3 glucan<br />

synthase, is regulated by switching between<br />

a GDP-bound inactive state <strong>and</strong> a GTP-bound<br />

activestatewithconformationalchanges(Weietal.<br />

1997; Fig. 5.8). Only mutations in this gene lead<br />

to a growth-deficient phenotype in moulds (Guest<br />

et al. 2004). After synthesis in the ER, Rho1p is<br />

geranylgeranylated, a modification required for<br />

attachment of Rho1p to the membrane <strong>and</strong> for<br />

transport (Inoue et al. 1999). Geranylgeranylated<br />

Rho1p <strong>and</strong> Fks1p are transported to the plasma<br />

membrane as an inactive complex through the<br />

classical secretory pathways (Abe et al. 2003).<br />

Rho1p is activated on its arrival at the plasma<br />

membrane by Rom2p, the GDP/GTP exchange<br />

factor of Rho1 which is localised only at the plasma<br />

membrane. This activation, <strong>and</strong> the movement of<br />

Fks1p on the plasma membrane are required for<br />

proper cell wall β1,3 glucan localisation (Utsugi<br />

et al. 2002). Since Rho1 is a key regulator of fungal<br />

growth, it is not surprising that it is submitted<br />

to multiple regulators. Accordingly, numerous<br />

Rho1p regulators acting downstream on glucan<br />

synthesis have been identified, although their role<br />

is not fully understood. Besides the GTP-exchange<br />

factors (GEF) Rom2p <strong>and</strong> Rom1p, other GTPase<br />

activating proteins (GAPs) exist, such as Bem2p,<br />

Sac7p <strong>and</strong> Lrg1p (Heinisch et al. 1999; Watanabe<br />

et al. 2001; Schmidt <strong>and</strong> Hall 2002; Calonge et al.<br />

2003; Fitch et al. 2004), which down-regulate β1,3<br />

glucan synthesis. A multicopy suppressor screen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!