Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
II. Germling Fusion<br />
Even during the early days of mycology, microscope<br />
analysis of fusion between germinating<br />
asexual spores was described in detail. In 1930,<br />
Köhler described interactions between germinating<br />
conidia of the same or of different species.<br />
Köhler (1930) also reported that conidia of Botrytis<br />
allii <strong>and</strong> Fusarium sp. fuse by small hyphal<br />
bridges (“Fusionshyphen”), which are significantly<br />
narrower than germ tubes (Fig. 7.2A). In Fusarium<br />
oxysporum, Mesterhazy (1973) also observed that<br />
ungerminated macroconidia can be connected by<br />
short fusion bridges while still in asexual reproductive<br />
structures, termed sporodochia. Recent studies<br />
on Colletotrichum species <strong>and</strong> on N. crassa showed<br />
that specialized structures connect germlings as<br />
well as ungerminated conidia (Roca et al. 2003,<br />
2005). These conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs)<br />
differ in size <strong>and</strong> growth behavior from germ tubes.<br />
In addition to conidia, Köhler (1930) described<br />
fusion between germ tubes within single isolates<br />
of Botrytis, Sclerotinia, Neurospora <strong>and</strong> Fusarium<br />
species (Fig. 7.2B). More recent reports describe<br />
germling fusion in Fusarium sp., Venturia inaequalis<br />
<strong>and</strong> N. crassa (Leu 1967; Mesterhazy 1973;<br />
P<strong>and</strong>ey et al. 2004; Roca et al. 2005; Fig. 7.2C). It<br />
Fig. 7.2. A–D Germinating conidia in close proximity undergo<br />
germling fusion. A Germling fusion between conidia<br />
from Fusarium sp. Adapted from Köhler (1929). B Anastomosis<br />
between germinating conidia from N. crassa. Adapted<br />
from Köhler (1929). C Germling fusion (arrow) between<br />
germinating conidia of N. crassa. Bar = 10 μm. D Lack of<br />
germling fusion in the N. crassa anastomosis mutant so.<br />
Although contact between germ tubes is evident, fusion<br />
(cell wall breakdown <strong>and</strong> membrane fusion) does not occur<br />
(arrow)<br />
Anastomosis in Filamentous Fungi 125<br />
is currently unclear whether mechanistic or signaling<br />
differences occur between conidial fusion<br />
involving CATs versus germling fusion.<br />
Köhler (1930) also observed interactions<br />
between conidia of different species, although<br />
complete germling fusions were not observed. For<br />
example, conidia of N. sitophila <strong>and</strong> N. tetrasperma<br />
formed small pegs when confronted. Interactions<br />
between species that were not closely related were<br />
also observed, e.g., hyphae of Botrytis allii formed<br />
small pegs in response to approaching hyphal<br />
tips of N. sitophila. Compared to intra-species<br />
interactions, however, these interactions between<br />
different species were weak.<br />
The frequency of germling fusion in a number<br />
ofspeciesisapparentlyaffectedbybothnutritional<br />
<strong>and</strong> environmental factors. Generally speaking,<br />
the following rule applies: the fewer nutrients, the<br />
more anastomoses. In Leptosphaeria coniothyrium,<br />
Sclerotinia fructigena, Botrytis <strong>and</strong> Fusarium sp.,<br />
the frequency of germling fusion was reduced on<br />
rich media (such as 1% malt or potato dextrose<br />
agar), but higher on diluted media (Laibach 1928;<br />
Köhler 1930). However, Leu (1967) reported that<br />
the number of fusions formed between germlings<br />
of Venturia inaequalis was significantly greater<br />
on complete medium than on basal medium or<br />
water agar. These results suggest that factors other<br />
than nutrient availability also contribute to the<br />
frequency of germling fusion between conidia.<br />
In addition to nutritional factors that affect the<br />
frequency of germling fusion, a number of studies<br />
have suggested that the initiation of fusion events<br />
among conidia shows a conidial density-dependent<br />
function. In V. inaequalis, fusion was not observed<br />
between two isolated conidia mounted close to one<br />
another (Leu 1967). However, if multiple conidia<br />
were placed close to one another under the same<br />
conditions, numerous germling fusion events were<br />
observed. Fusion between an isolated conidial pair<br />
could be induced by the addition of culture filtrate<br />
fromthesameordifferentisolates.Interestingly,<br />
culture filtrates from isolates that were anastomosis<br />
deficient did not induce fusion in this assay. The<br />
observed fusion induction was apparently speciesspecific<br />
because culture filtrates of V. pirina did<br />
not induce fusions between V. inaequalis conidia.<br />
III. Hyphal Fusion<br />
Like conidial germling fusion, hyphal fusion<br />
attracted the attention of early mycologists. In