29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sub-apical hyphal cells likely provide a reservoir of<br />

mitotically quiescent nuclei that are somewhat resistant<br />

to the effects of DNA damage (Harris 1997).<br />

Because similar compartments of mitotically inactive<br />

nuclei do not appear to exist in N. crassa <strong>and</strong><br />

A. gossypii, these fungi may be more reliant upon<br />

mitotic asynchrony to maintain viability after exposure<br />

to DNA damaging agents.<br />

VII. Coordination of Mitosis<br />

with Branch Formation<br />

The formation of lateral branches is a morphogeneticprocessuniquetofilamentousfungi<br />

(Momany 2002). Several studies have shown that<br />

branch formation is tightly coordinated with<br />

growth (Trinci 1978). For example, new tips<br />

typically form to accommodate the increased<br />

volume of cytoplasm generated under optimal<br />

growth conditions. More recently, it was also<br />

demonstrated that branch formation correlates<br />

with mitosis (Dynesen <strong>and</strong> Nielsen 2003). In<br />

particular, although the inhibition of mitosis in<br />

A. nidulans using either nimX or nimA mutations<br />

does not affect growth, it clearly prevents the<br />

initiation of new branches. The coordination<br />

of branch formation with mitosis may ensure<br />

the appropriate ratio of cytoplasmic volume per<br />

nucleus is maintained in growing hyphae.<br />

The mechanisms underlying the relationship<br />

between mitosis <strong>and</strong> branch formation remain an<br />

interesting puzzle. Although mitosis is required<br />

for branching, a recent study suggested that early<br />

events in branch formation might precede mitosis<br />

(Westfall <strong>and</strong> Momany 2002). Specifically, in<br />

A. nidulans, localization of the septin AspB to the<br />

incipient branch site occurs before the previously<br />

quiescent nuclei reenter mitosis. Moreover, septin<br />

localization persists during the first mitosis, before<br />

finally disappearing as the new branch elongates.<br />

Because septins have a conserved role in cellular<br />

morphogenesis as organizational scaffolds capable<br />

of linking cytoskeletal dynamics with the cell<br />

cycle (Gladfelter et al. 2001), this observation suggests<br />

a potential model for the reciprocal coordination<br />

of mitosis <strong>and</strong> branch formation (Fig. 3.5).<br />

In particular, septins may provide an anchor for<br />

the localized recruitment of regulatory proteins<br />

that promote mitotic reentry, such as the Cdc25<br />

phosphatase. At the same time, other mitotic regulators<br />

may influence septin organization, thereby<br />

Fungal Mitosis 45<br />

Fig. 3.5.A–D Model for the coordinated regulation of branch<br />

formation <strong>and</strong> mitosis. A A septin ring forms at the presumptive<br />

branch site (shaded circle). Nuclei remain in G2.<br />

B A signal generated by regulators associated with the septin<br />

ring promotes mitotic entry as the new branch emerges. C<br />

Nuclei undergo mitosis (closed circles) as the new branch<br />

continuestoextend.D The septin ring disassembles, <strong>and</strong><br />

post-mitotic nuclear migration into the new branch occurs<br />

modulating cytoskeletal function to prevent commitment<br />

to branch formation if mitosis does not<br />

proceedproperly.Itshouldbepossibletotestthis<br />

speculative model using the tools available for A.<br />

nidulans. More importantly, it will be necessary to<br />

determine if the coordination of branching with<br />

mitosis is a general feature of filamentous fungi,<br />

or if it is limited to only those fungi that, like<br />

A. nidulans, form obviously differentiated hyphal<br />

compartments (Harris 1997).<br />

VIII. Regulation of Mitosis in Response<br />

to DNA Damage <strong>and</strong> Replication<br />

Stress<br />

A characteristic feature of the DNA damage response<br />

is the activation of checkpoints that block<br />

mitosis when DNA is damaged (Zhou <strong>and</strong> Elledge<br />

2000). Typically, DNA damage inhibits CDK activation<br />

<strong>and</strong> causes arrest prior to mitotic entry. Because<br />

A. nidulans possesses two mitosis-promoting<br />

protein kinases, it was of interest to determine how<br />

their respective activities were affected by DNA<br />

damage. As demonstrated by Ye et al. (1997b), exposure<br />

of hyphal cells to DNA damage blocks mitotic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!