Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>and</strong> a multi-drug resistance protein respectively<br />
(Aichinger et al. 2003). The mig1 <strong>and</strong> mig2<br />
(maize-induced) gene clusters comprise two<br />
<strong>and</strong> five highly homologous co-regulated genes<br />
respectively, which are highly expressed during the<br />
biotrophic stage <strong>and</strong> encode small, cysteine-rich<br />
secreted proteins sharing no homologies to known<br />
proteins (Basse et al. 2002b). udet1 was also<br />
identified as being up-regulated during fungal<br />
growth in planta, <strong>and</strong> was subsequently shown to<br />
encode a steroid 5α reductase by complementing<br />
a det2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Inplants,<br />
these enzymes are needed for the synthesis of<br />
brassinosteroids, hormones which control plant<br />
development. However, udet1 mutants were unaffected<br />
in pathogenic development (Basse et al.<br />
2002a), which rules out that Udet1 is involved<br />
in synthesis of the trigger for tumour induction.<br />
Deletion of either the entire pig or the entire mig2<br />
cluster was also without effect on pathogenicity<br />
(Basse et al. 2002b; Aichinger et al. 2003).<br />
The mig genes as well as ssp1, a gene encoding<br />
a potential dioxygenase predominantly expressed<br />
in teliospores (Huber et al. 2002), are negatively<br />
regulated by the histone deacetylase Hda1 (Huber<br />
et al. 2002; Torreblanca et al. 2003). Hda1 is<br />
thought to form a complex with a previously identified<br />
regulatory protein, Rum1 (Quadbeck-Seeger<br />
et al. 2000), <strong>and</strong> was shown to regulate a distinct<br />
set of genes presumably by modulation of their<br />
chromatin structure (Reichmann et al. 2002). The<br />
deletion of either rum1 or hda1 leads to a defined<br />
developmental block prior to the formation<br />
of teliospores (Quadbeck-Seeger et al. 2000; Reichmann<br />
et al. 2002). It is likely that modulation of<br />
chromatin structure represents an additional level<br />
of global gene regulation which is used for coregulating<br />
specific sets of genes.<br />
Preliminary data from array analyses indicate<br />
that a set of more than 500 genes is plant-regulated.<br />
This set includes various genes which encode transporters<br />
for carbon compounds <strong>and</strong> amino acids,<br />
possibly reflecting adaptation of U. maydis to<br />
conditions encountered in the plant environment<br />
(M. Vranes <strong>and</strong> J. Kämper, unpublished data). Research<br />
on those genes whose expression is confined<br />
to the biotrophic phase is currently focused on their<br />
regulators (Farfsing et al. 2005), as it is anticipated<br />
that deletions in the corresponding regulatory<br />
genes will affect pathogenic development. We<br />
expect that the systematic analysis of these genes<br />
will provide important insights into the process of<br />
fungal adaptation during biotrophic growth.<br />
Regulatory <strong>and</strong> Structural Networks in Ustilago maydis 383<br />
IV. Small GTPase Networks<br />
for Cytokinesis <strong>and</strong> Dimorphism<br />
GTP-binding proteins of the Ras superfamily act<br />
as molecular switches <strong>and</strong> are involved in diverse<br />
biological processes (Bourne et al. 1990). They exist<br />
in two different states, the active GTP-bound<br />
conformation <strong>and</strong> the inactive GDP-bound form.<br />
Switching between active <strong>and</strong> inactive forms is regulated<br />
by interaction with specific accessory proteins.<br />
Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs)<br />
activate Ras-like GTPases by catalysing the release<br />
of GDP, which is then immediately replaced with<br />
GTP (Cherfils <strong>and</strong> Chardin 1999). Inactivation of<br />
these molecular switches requires interaction with<br />
GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) which stimulate<br />
the low intrinsic GTPase activity resulting in<br />
the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP (Bernards <strong>and</strong> Settleman<br />
2004). Most members of the family of Ras-like<br />
proteins are associated with cellular membranes<br />
(Fig. 18.6). Membrane binding is mediated by hydrophobic<br />
membrane anchors consisting of a Cterminal<br />
farnesylation, as in the case of Ras, or<br />
geranylgeranylation, as in the case of Rho/Rac proteins<br />
(Zhang <strong>and</strong> Casey 1996). An additional level of<br />
regulation occurs by Rho/Rac-specific guanine nucleotide<br />
dissociation inhibitors (Rho-GDIs) which<br />
can bind to the prenylated C terminus. Binding<br />
of Rho-GDI results in the relocalization of GTPases<br />
from the membrane to the cytoplasm, by sequestering<br />
the hydrophobic membrane anchor (Olofsson<br />
1999).<br />
Fig. 18.6. Signalling network involving small GTPases of<br />
the Rho/Rac family in U. maydis. The highly related GT-<br />
Pases Rac1 <strong>and</strong> Cdc42 trigger both specific <strong>and</strong> common<br />
pathways. Potential GEFs (Don1 <strong>and</strong> Cdc24) <strong>and</strong> target kinases<br />
(Don3 <strong>and</strong> Cla4) are indicated by ovals <strong>and</strong> hexagons<br />
respectively. The distinct phenotypes of Cdc42 <strong>and</strong> Rac1<br />
deletion mutants stress their involvement in specific as well<br />
as overlapping signalling events