29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> a multi-drug resistance protein respectively<br />

(Aichinger et al. 2003). The mig1 <strong>and</strong> mig2<br />

(maize-induced) gene clusters comprise two<br />

<strong>and</strong> five highly homologous co-regulated genes<br />

respectively, which are highly expressed during the<br />

biotrophic stage <strong>and</strong> encode small, cysteine-rich<br />

secreted proteins sharing no homologies to known<br />

proteins (Basse et al. 2002b). udet1 was also<br />

identified as being up-regulated during fungal<br />

growth in planta, <strong>and</strong> was subsequently shown to<br />

encode a steroid 5α reductase by complementing<br />

a det2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Inplants,<br />

these enzymes are needed for the synthesis of<br />

brassinosteroids, hormones which control plant<br />

development. However, udet1 mutants were unaffected<br />

in pathogenic development (Basse et al.<br />

2002a), which rules out that Udet1 is involved<br />

in synthesis of the trigger for tumour induction.<br />

Deletion of either the entire pig or the entire mig2<br />

cluster was also without effect on pathogenicity<br />

(Basse et al. 2002b; Aichinger et al. 2003).<br />

The mig genes as well as ssp1, a gene encoding<br />

a potential dioxygenase predominantly expressed<br />

in teliospores (Huber et al. 2002), are negatively<br />

regulated by the histone deacetylase Hda1 (Huber<br />

et al. 2002; Torreblanca et al. 2003). Hda1 is<br />

thought to form a complex with a previously identified<br />

regulatory protein, Rum1 (Quadbeck-Seeger<br />

et al. 2000), <strong>and</strong> was shown to regulate a distinct<br />

set of genes presumably by modulation of their<br />

chromatin structure (Reichmann et al. 2002). The<br />

deletion of either rum1 or hda1 leads to a defined<br />

developmental block prior to the formation<br />

of teliospores (Quadbeck-Seeger et al. 2000; Reichmann<br />

et al. 2002). It is likely that modulation of<br />

chromatin structure represents an additional level<br />

of global gene regulation which is used for coregulating<br />

specific sets of genes.<br />

Preliminary data from array analyses indicate<br />

that a set of more than 500 genes is plant-regulated.<br />

This set includes various genes which encode transporters<br />

for carbon compounds <strong>and</strong> amino acids,<br />

possibly reflecting adaptation of U. maydis to<br />

conditions encountered in the plant environment<br />

(M. Vranes <strong>and</strong> J. Kämper, unpublished data). Research<br />

on those genes whose expression is confined<br />

to the biotrophic phase is currently focused on their<br />

regulators (Farfsing et al. 2005), as it is anticipated<br />

that deletions in the corresponding regulatory<br />

genes will affect pathogenic development. We<br />

expect that the systematic analysis of these genes<br />

will provide important insights into the process of<br />

fungal adaptation during biotrophic growth.<br />

Regulatory <strong>and</strong> Structural Networks in Ustilago maydis 383<br />

IV. Small GTPase Networks<br />

for Cytokinesis <strong>and</strong> Dimorphism<br />

GTP-binding proteins of the Ras superfamily act<br />

as molecular switches <strong>and</strong> are involved in diverse<br />

biological processes (Bourne et al. 1990). They exist<br />

in two different states, the active GTP-bound<br />

conformation <strong>and</strong> the inactive GDP-bound form.<br />

Switching between active <strong>and</strong> inactive forms is regulated<br />

by interaction with specific accessory proteins.<br />

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs)<br />

activate Ras-like GTPases by catalysing the release<br />

of GDP, which is then immediately replaced with<br />

GTP (Cherfils <strong>and</strong> Chardin 1999). Inactivation of<br />

these molecular switches requires interaction with<br />

GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) which stimulate<br />

the low intrinsic GTPase activity resulting in<br />

the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP (Bernards <strong>and</strong> Settleman<br />

2004). Most members of the family of Ras-like<br />

proteins are associated with cellular membranes<br />

(Fig. 18.6). Membrane binding is mediated by hydrophobic<br />

membrane anchors consisting of a Cterminal<br />

farnesylation, as in the case of Ras, or<br />

geranylgeranylation, as in the case of Rho/Rac proteins<br />

(Zhang <strong>and</strong> Casey 1996). An additional level of<br />

regulation occurs by Rho/Rac-specific guanine nucleotide<br />

dissociation inhibitors (Rho-GDIs) which<br />

can bind to the prenylated C terminus. Binding<br />

of Rho-GDI results in the relocalization of GTPases<br />

from the membrane to the cytoplasm, by sequestering<br />

the hydrophobic membrane anchor (Olofsson<br />

1999).<br />

Fig. 18.6. Signalling network involving small GTPases of<br />

the Rho/Rac family in U. maydis. The highly related GT-<br />

Pases Rac1 <strong>and</strong> Cdc42 trigger both specific <strong>and</strong> common<br />

pathways. Potential GEFs (Don1 <strong>and</strong> Cdc24) <strong>and</strong> target kinases<br />

(Don3 <strong>and</strong> Cla4) are indicated by ovals <strong>and</strong> hexagons<br />

respectively. The distinct phenotypes of Cdc42 <strong>and</strong> Rac1<br />

deletion mutants stress their involvement in specific as well<br />

as overlapping signalling events

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!