29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the A mating type pathway strongly enhances<br />

chlamydospore production when a dikaryon is<br />

kept in the dark whereas constant incubation with<br />

blue light represses chlamydospore production.<br />

Additional activation of the B mating type pathway<br />

promotes the process but activation on its own<br />

also has an effect (Kües et al. 1998a, 2002b).<br />

Chlamydospores are produced under conditions<br />

favouring fruiting body development, as part of<br />

thesexualmodeofreproductiononthedikaryon.<br />

Fruiting body development occurs at 25–28 ◦ C<br />

<strong>and</strong> needs repeated impulses of blue-light low<br />

energy but it is suppressed by higher light energies<br />

which are effective in oidiation (Kües 2000; Fischer<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kües 2003; Kües et al. 2004). Chlamydospores<br />

accumulate glycogen which can serve as energy<br />

source for fruiting (Madelin 1960; Moore 1998).<br />

Thepositiveregulationinthedikaryon,<strong>and</strong>the<br />

functional linkage to fruiting corroborate that<br />

there are genes for chlamydospore production<br />

which are primarily dikaryon-specific.<br />

Genes acting in asexual sporulation in C.<br />

cinereus other than the mating type genes have so<br />

far not been identified. The homokaryotic mutant<br />

strain AmutBmut has defects in both mating type<br />

loci, which makes oidiation a light-controlled<br />

process (Kertesz-Chaloupkova et al. 1998) <strong>and</strong> also<br />

leads to fruiting body production without the need<br />

to mate with another strain (Boulianne et al. 2000;<br />

Walser et al. 2003). A mutant screening approach<br />

in this strain identified many morphological<br />

changes in oidiophore <strong>and</strong> spore production<br />

<strong>and</strong> morphology. In most instances, the aerial<br />

mycelium is simultaneously affected with alterations<br />

in oidiation <strong>and</strong>, in about 85% of the cases,<br />

also fruiting body formation (Polak 1999). To<br />

separate genes acting generally in growth <strong>and</strong><br />

development as well as nonessential or marginally<br />

important genes from functions acting specifically<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or being essential in oidiation, a detailed<br />

analysis of sexual <strong>and</strong> asexual phenotypes is<br />

required. Strain AmutBmut produces mainly the<br />

advanced type 1 <strong>and</strong> type 2A oidiophores (Polak<br />

et al. 1997a, 2001), some of the mutants rather<br />

the less-developed type 3 or type 4 structures or<br />

irregularly structured oidiophores with altered<br />

stems, branching or oidial hyphae production. In<br />

other cases, branched <strong>and</strong> elongated oidial hyphae<br />

with aberrant nuclear distributions were observed.<br />

A considerable number of mutant phenotypes,<br />

however, relate to the spores themselves. Spores<br />

occur which are much longer or shorter than<br />

normal, swollen spores, shrivelled spores <strong>and</strong><br />

Fungal Asexual Sporulation 283<br />

branched spores. In a flocculating strain, the outer<br />

fimbriae <strong>and</strong> the gelatinous layer were found to be<br />

absent in the spores. In one mutant, apical oidia<br />

separated not by schizolysis, the norm, but rather<br />

through ripping of the cell below (rhexolysis). In<br />

another mutant, spores are not released. There<br />

are also interesting regulatory mutants including<br />

constitutive producers <strong>and</strong> spore-negative strains<br />

unable to initiate oidiophore production (Polak<br />

1999). The pool of available mutants holds promise<br />

for future work to identify many interesting genes.<br />

D. Conserved Genetic Pathways<br />

From the compilation of characterized genes from<br />

variousfungiwepresentedinSect.IV.B,itisclear<br />

that there are functions in asexual spore production<br />

conserved between species. Even if the mechanisms<br />

of spore formation <strong>and</strong> the environmental<br />

requirements were variable among different fungi,<br />

some genetic pathways or particular elements of<br />

these pathway may be evolutionarily conserved.<br />

How broadly will this be?<br />

The availability of several fungal genome sequencesallowsustoaddressthisquestionfairly<br />

easily by means of Blast searches, in contrast to<br />

less-straightforward experimental methods such<br />

as heterologous complementation or PCR-based<br />

approaches (Prade <strong>and</strong> Timberlake 1994). In such<br />

a computer-based approach, however, one should<br />

bear in mind that sequence conservation does not<br />

necessarily imply conserved cellular functions! It<br />

is obvious that all fungi contain components of the<br />

main signalling pathways, for example, various Gproteins,<br />

proteins of the MAP cascade, <strong>and</strong> certain<br />

transcription factors which can affect growth <strong>and</strong><br />

development in more than one way (Lengeler et al.<br />

2000), including pathways of asexual sporulation<br />

(see Sects. IV.A.2 <strong>and</strong> IV.B). Possible contributions<br />

of such regular elements to asexual spore development<br />

in a specific fungus certainly need to be addressed<br />

experimentally. However, there are other<br />

functions expected to act primarily during steps<br />

of asexual sporulation, <strong>and</strong> unlikely to play roles<br />

in other cellular pathways (see Sects. IV.A.2 <strong>and</strong><br />

IV.B).<br />

Here, we used genes of A. nidulans central to<br />

the conidiation process, <strong>and</strong> analysed the genomes<br />

of a number of different fungi. The results are summarized<br />

in Table 14.1. Probably not unexpected<br />

because of the structurally related conidiophores<br />

<strong>and</strong> the same phialidic mode of conidia produc-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!