Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
126 N.L. Glass <strong>and</strong> A. Fleissner<br />
1888, Marshall Ward published his work on<br />
a Botrytis species found on lily (Ward 1888). He<br />
described how hyphae were attracted to each other<br />
at a distance, <strong>and</strong> showed directed growth followed<br />
by fusion. In N. crassa <strong>and</strong> other filamentous<br />
ascomycete species, the frequency of hyphal<br />
fusion within a vegetative colony varies from the<br />
periphery to the interior of the colony, <strong>and</strong> also<br />
within the interior of the colony itself (Hickey et al.<br />
2002). Hyphal tips at the periphery of the colony<br />
are refractory to hyphal fusion. At the periphery,<br />
hyphae grow straight out from the colony <strong>and</strong><br />
show subapical branching. The leading hyphae<br />
as well as the subapical branches show avoidance<br />
(negative autotropism), presumably to maximize<br />
the outward growth of the colony (Trinci 1984).<br />
Even in cases of contact between hyphae at the<br />
periphery of the colony, fusion is not observed<br />
(Hickey et al. 2002).<br />
Intheinnerportionofacolony,hyphaeshow<br />
a different behavior. They branch <strong>and</strong> begin to<br />
fill the spaces between individual hyphae. Instead<br />
of avoidance, certain hyphae show attraction, directed<br />
growth <strong>and</strong> hyphal anastomoses (Köhler<br />
1929; Buller 1933; Hickey et al. 2002). Within the<br />
colony, microscope observations suggest that competency<br />
plays a role in vegetative hyphal fusion,<br />
that is, not all hyphae within a colony are equally<br />
competent to respond to fusion signals. The nature<br />
of the difference in competency among hyphal<br />
types <strong>and</strong> position within a colony is unknown. It<br />
is clear that different morphologies of hyphae occur<br />
within the interior of a colony, also in N. crassa<br />
(for terminology, see Bistis et al. 2003). Thus, the<br />
various hyphal types within a colony may be in<br />
different physiological states with respect to hyphal<br />
fusion. The spatial frequency of anastomosis<br />
within the fusion-competent regions of a colony<br />
can also vary, although parameters that affect this<br />
process are unclear.<br />
Similarly to germling fusion, studies on<br />
filamentous fungi have shown that the ability<br />
to undergo hyphal fusion is highly influenced<br />
by growth conditions. Investigations of nutritional<br />
conditions affecting hyphal anastomosis<br />
frequency in the basidiomycete species Rhizoctonia<br />
solani <strong>and</strong> Schizophyllum commune also<br />
showed a negative correlation between nutrient<br />
concentration <strong>and</strong> fusion frequency (Ahmad <strong>and</strong><br />
Miles 1970; Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi 1988). Nitrogen<br />
levels affected hyphal fusion frequency in the<br />
basidiomycetes R. solani (Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi<br />
1988) <strong>and</strong> R. oryzae (Bhuiyan <strong>and</strong> Arai 1993). The<br />
addition of nitrogen to nutrient-poor media led to<br />
the largest decrease in hyphal fusion frequency,<br />
compared to the addition of other compounds<br />
such as carbon, potassium, phosphate, magnesium<br />
or iron.<br />
The formation of interconnected networks<br />
<strong>and</strong> the pooling of existing storage compounds<br />
may favor the survival of a fungal individual<br />
under suboptimal environmental conditions.<br />
While this theory assumes that anastomosis is<br />
beneficial, other authors speculate that fusion<br />
could be somehow connected with parasitism<br />
<strong>and</strong> pathogenicity (Laibach 1928). In this scenario,<br />
one fusion partner would benefit from the<br />
nutrient sources of the other, a type of resource<br />
plundering. A resemblance between hyphal fusion<br />
<strong>and</strong> infection of plant hosts by pathogenic fungi<br />
has also been reported (Chen <strong>and</strong> Wu 1977;<br />
Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi 1988). In addition, some<br />
aspects of mycoparasitism show similarity to the<br />
hyphal fusion process. Mycoparasites recognize<br />
a diffusible signal produced by the host, which<br />
results in the reorientation of a hyphal growth<br />
trajectory (Evans <strong>and</strong> Cooke 1982; Jeffries 1985).<br />
In the host–parasite system of Absidia glauca <strong>and</strong><br />
Parasitella parasitica (bothmembersoftheZygomycota),<br />
fusion bridges were observed between<br />
mycelia of the two species (Kellner et al. 1993). The<br />
interaction between Absidia <strong>and</strong> Parasitella was<br />
mating-type dependent; only + mating-type A.<br />
glauca were infected by – mating-type P. parasitica,<br />
<strong>and</strong>viceversa.Theseobservationsledtothe<br />
hypothesis that this parasitic interaction might be<br />
an abortive attempt at sexual conjugation (Satina<br />
<strong>and</strong> Blakeslee 1926; Jeffries 1985), representing an<br />
interesting example of how basic mechanisms such<br />
as mating <strong>and</strong> cell fusion could evolve to serve new<br />
purposes. Similarly, in nematode-trapping fungi,<br />
such as Arthrobotrys oligospora, trap formation<br />
requires a hyphal fusion event (Nordbring-Hertz<br />
et al. 1989). Fusion occurs between a small<br />
branch growing initially perpendicular to the<br />
leading hyphae <strong>and</strong> the parental hypha; the<br />
self-communication <strong>and</strong> signaling processes that<br />
regulate the formation of the trap must occur at<br />
a very fine spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal scale.<br />
IV. Mechanistic Aspects of Anastomosis<br />
In 1933, Buller outlined morphological aspects<br />
of anastomosis in detail (Buller 1933). Based on