29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126 N.L. Glass <strong>and</strong> A. Fleissner<br />

1888, Marshall Ward published his work on<br />

a Botrytis species found on lily (Ward 1888). He<br />

described how hyphae were attracted to each other<br />

at a distance, <strong>and</strong> showed directed growth followed<br />

by fusion. In N. crassa <strong>and</strong> other filamentous<br />

ascomycete species, the frequency of hyphal<br />

fusion within a vegetative colony varies from the<br />

periphery to the interior of the colony, <strong>and</strong> also<br />

within the interior of the colony itself (Hickey et al.<br />

2002). Hyphal tips at the periphery of the colony<br />

are refractory to hyphal fusion. At the periphery,<br />

hyphae grow straight out from the colony <strong>and</strong><br />

show subapical branching. The leading hyphae<br />

as well as the subapical branches show avoidance<br />

(negative autotropism), presumably to maximize<br />

the outward growth of the colony (Trinci 1984).<br />

Even in cases of contact between hyphae at the<br />

periphery of the colony, fusion is not observed<br />

(Hickey et al. 2002).<br />

Intheinnerportionofacolony,hyphaeshow<br />

a different behavior. They branch <strong>and</strong> begin to<br />

fill the spaces between individual hyphae. Instead<br />

of avoidance, certain hyphae show attraction, directed<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> hyphal anastomoses (Köhler<br />

1929; Buller 1933; Hickey et al. 2002). Within the<br />

colony, microscope observations suggest that competency<br />

plays a role in vegetative hyphal fusion,<br />

that is, not all hyphae within a colony are equally<br />

competent to respond to fusion signals. The nature<br />

of the difference in competency among hyphal<br />

types <strong>and</strong> position within a colony is unknown. It<br />

is clear that different morphologies of hyphae occur<br />

within the interior of a colony, also in N. crassa<br />

(for terminology, see Bistis et al. 2003). Thus, the<br />

various hyphal types within a colony may be in<br />

different physiological states with respect to hyphal<br />

fusion. The spatial frequency of anastomosis<br />

within the fusion-competent regions of a colony<br />

can also vary, although parameters that affect this<br />

process are unclear.<br />

Similarly to germling fusion, studies on<br />

filamentous fungi have shown that the ability<br />

to undergo hyphal fusion is highly influenced<br />

by growth conditions. Investigations of nutritional<br />

conditions affecting hyphal anastomosis<br />

frequency in the basidiomycete species Rhizoctonia<br />

solani <strong>and</strong> Schizophyllum commune also<br />

showed a negative correlation between nutrient<br />

concentration <strong>and</strong> fusion frequency (Ahmad <strong>and</strong><br />

Miles 1970; Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi 1988). Nitrogen<br />

levels affected hyphal fusion frequency in the<br />

basidiomycetes R. solani (Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi<br />

1988) <strong>and</strong> R. oryzae (Bhuiyan <strong>and</strong> Arai 1993). The<br />

addition of nitrogen to nutrient-poor media led to<br />

the largest decrease in hyphal fusion frequency,<br />

compared to the addition of other compounds<br />

such as carbon, potassium, phosphate, magnesium<br />

or iron.<br />

The formation of interconnected networks<br />

<strong>and</strong> the pooling of existing storage compounds<br />

may favor the survival of a fungal individual<br />

under suboptimal environmental conditions.<br />

While this theory assumes that anastomosis is<br />

beneficial, other authors speculate that fusion<br />

could be somehow connected with parasitism<br />

<strong>and</strong> pathogenicity (Laibach 1928). In this scenario,<br />

one fusion partner would benefit from the<br />

nutrient sources of the other, a type of resource<br />

plundering. A resemblance between hyphal fusion<br />

<strong>and</strong> infection of plant hosts by pathogenic fungi<br />

has also been reported (Chen <strong>and</strong> Wu 1977;<br />

Yokoyama <strong>and</strong> Ogoshi 1988). In addition, some<br />

aspects of mycoparasitism show similarity to the<br />

hyphal fusion process. Mycoparasites recognize<br />

a diffusible signal produced by the host, which<br />

results in the reorientation of a hyphal growth<br />

trajectory (Evans <strong>and</strong> Cooke 1982; Jeffries 1985).<br />

In the host–parasite system of Absidia glauca <strong>and</strong><br />

Parasitella parasitica (bothmembersoftheZygomycota),<br />

fusion bridges were observed between<br />

mycelia of the two species (Kellner et al. 1993). The<br />

interaction between Absidia <strong>and</strong> Parasitella was<br />

mating-type dependent; only + mating-type A.<br />

glauca were infected by – mating-type P. parasitica,<br />

<strong>and</strong>viceversa.Theseobservationsledtothe<br />

hypothesis that this parasitic interaction might be<br />

an abortive attempt at sexual conjugation (Satina<br />

<strong>and</strong> Blakeslee 1926; Jeffries 1985), representing an<br />

interesting example of how basic mechanisms such<br />

as mating <strong>and</strong> cell fusion could evolve to serve new<br />

purposes. Similarly, in nematode-trapping fungi,<br />

such as Arthrobotrys oligospora, trap formation<br />

requires a hyphal fusion event (Nordbring-Hertz<br />

et al. 1989). Fusion occurs between a small<br />

branch growing initially perpendicular to the<br />

leading hyphae <strong>and</strong> the parental hypha; the<br />

self-communication <strong>and</strong> signaling processes that<br />

regulate the formation of the trap must occur at<br />

a very fine spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal scale.<br />

IV. Mechanistic Aspects of Anastomosis<br />

In 1933, Buller outlined morphological aspects<br />

of anastomosis in detail (Buller 1933). Based on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!