29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

422 D. Zickler<br />

– First, chiasma <strong>and</strong> RNs never occur uniformly<br />

along chromosome arms, with a lesser<br />

tendency to occur around centromeres <strong>and</strong><br />

a greater tendency to occur in the middle of<br />

arms <strong>and</strong>/or in sub-telomeric regions (for<br />

mycelial fungi, see Zickler 1977; Holm et al.<br />

1981; Bojko 1989; Zickler et al. 1992; reviewed<br />

in von Wettstein et al. 1984; Zickler <strong>and</strong><br />

Kleckner 1999). Also, short chromosomes<br />

have higher number of COs per physical length<br />

than do longer chromosomes (Mautino et al.<br />

1993; Kaback et al. 1999). This non-r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

distribution along chromosomes is already<br />

reflected by the distribution of DSBs. They<br />

occurathigherfrequenciesinsomegenomic<br />

regions called hotspots, <strong>and</strong> at lower frequencies<br />

in other regions called coldspots (review<br />

in Petes 2001). Position of hotspots/DSBs may<br />

be regulated by chromatin structure. They<br />

are located in accessible (DNaseI-sensitive)<br />

regions of the chromatin <strong>and</strong> in chromosome<br />

domains that are GC-rich, whereas coldspots<br />

are often associated with centromere, telomere<br />

<strong>and</strong> AT-rich regions (Baudat <strong>and</strong> Nicolas<br />

1997; Gerton et al. 2000). This is confirmed<br />

by moving hotspot domains at various places<br />

along a chromosome; formation of DSBs<br />

is also controlled by distant cis <strong>and</strong> trans<br />

interactions (e.g., Wu <strong>and</strong> Lichten 1995). Most<br />

hotspots are intergenic, rather than intragenic.<br />

Meiotic recombination can also be regionally<br />

regulated, as in N. crassa <strong>and</strong> S. pombe (e.g., de<br />

Veaux <strong>and</strong> Smith 1994; Yeadon et al. 2004).<br />

– Second, each pair of homologous chromosomeswillhaveatleastoneCO/chiasma.This<br />

“obligatory chiasma” occurs irrespective of<br />

chromosome length, <strong>and</strong> is likely related to<br />

the fact that at least one chiasma is necessary<br />

to ensure regular segregation of the maternal<br />

<strong>and</strong> paternal homologous chromosomes at division<br />

I. The average number of chiasmata per<br />

bivalent being rather small in most organisms<br />

(see King <strong>and</strong> Mortimer 1990 for examples),<br />

this obligatory event is achieved by tight<br />

regulation. There are, however, two known<br />

exceptions: S. pombe <strong>and</strong> A. nidulans. Inboth<br />

organisms, the number of COs per meiosis<br />

<strong>and</strong> per chromosome is high enough, so that<br />

the probability that the smallest chromosome<br />

gets no CO is extremely low (2 ×10 −5 for S.<br />

pombe; review in Kohli <strong>and</strong> Bähler 1994).<br />

– Third, when two genetic intervals are considered,<br />

the presence of a CO at one position<br />

is accompanied by a decreased probability<br />

that another will occur nearby (for fungi,<br />

see Strickl<strong>and</strong> 1958; Perkins 1962; Perkins<br />

et al. 1993; Munz 1994). Also, if two or more<br />

chiasmataarepresentalongabivalent,they<br />

exhibit interference <strong>and</strong>, therefore, a tendency<br />

for even spacing. The strength of this interference<br />

is inversely correlated with distance<br />

(review in Jones 1984; Foss et al. 1993). By<br />

contrast, NCOs do not show interference,<br />

regardless of whether they are associated<br />

with COs (Mortimer <strong>and</strong> Fogel 1974). Also,<br />

chromatid interference (the fact that the<br />

choice of a non-sister chromatid involved in<br />

an exchange might influence the choice to be<br />

involved in another close exchange) was found<br />

to be absent or very rare (Perkins 1962; Esser<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kuenen 1967; Mortimer <strong>and</strong> Fogel 1974).<br />

The mechanism that regulates interference is not<br />

understood, although several models have been<br />

proposed.Thecountingmodel proposes thatafixed<br />

number of NCOs separate COs (Foss et al. 1993).<br />

Another model suggests that interference signals<br />

initiate at sites of COs <strong>and</strong> spread outward along<br />

the synaptonemal complex (SC; see Sect. V.), repressing<br />

additional COs in the neighborhood, in<br />

agreement with the fact that interference is not observed<br />

between intervals that are far apart (King<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mortimer 1990). The SC model has received<br />

support from two findings: (1) the parallel absence<br />

of CO interference <strong>and</strong> SC in A. nidulans <strong>and</strong> S.<br />

pombe (Strickl<strong>and</strong> 1958; Egel-Mitani et al. 1982;<br />

Bähler et al. 1993; Munz 1994), <strong>and</strong> (2) the parallel<br />

absence of SC <strong>and</strong> CO interference in the zip1<br />

mutant of budding yeast, Zip1p being an essential<br />

structural component of the SC central region<br />

(Sym <strong>and</strong> Roeder 1994; Fung et al. 2004). However,<br />

recent studies indicate that the SC is not required<br />

for interference in budding yeast <strong>and</strong> Drosophila,<br />

leaving the subject open for further explanations<br />

(see Bishop <strong>and</strong> Zickler 2004).<br />

IV. Homologue Recognition <strong>and</strong> Pairing<br />

Juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes is<br />

a prominent universal feature of meiosis. It<br />

involves a long-distance recognition of homology,<br />

which occurs no later than leptotene, in advance<br />

of SC formation. Pairing, namely, the distinction<br />

between “self” <strong>and</strong> “non-self”, is therefore<br />

a fundamental biological problem. However, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!