Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
380 M. Feldbrügge et al.<br />
et al. 2004; Fig. 18.4). Transcription of crk1 is<br />
regulated antagonistically by PKA <strong>and</strong> MAPK<br />
signalling, <strong>and</strong> overexpression of crk1 is sufficient<br />
to trigger filament formation (Garrido <strong>and</strong> Pérez-<br />
Martín 2003; Fig. 18.4). Potential transcriptional<br />
regulators for crk1 couldbeHgl1<strong>and</strong>Sql1.Hgl1,<br />
a PKA target in vitro, was identified as suppressor<br />
for the filamentous phenotype of adr1Δ mutants<br />
(Dürrenberger et al. 2001). Sql1, a functional<br />
homologue of the transcriptional repressor Ssn6p<br />
from S. cerevisiae, hasbeenshowntosuppress<br />
the phenotype of an activated cAMP pathway<br />
(Loubradou et al. 2001; Fig. 18.4).<br />
The induction of filaments by Crk1 is also<br />
regulated posttranscriptionally by Fuz7/Ubc5- <strong>and</strong><br />
Kpp2/Ubc3-dependent phosphorylation of the<br />
N- <strong>and</strong> C-terminal domains of Crk1 respectively.<br />
Interestingly, the MAPK sites in the C terminus<br />
are dispensable for Crk1 function during mating<br />
(Garrido et al. 2004; Figs. 18.3 <strong>and</strong> 18.4). This<br />
results in a complex mode of regulation in which<br />
the N-terminal part of Crk1, which has MAPK<br />
activity, is a MAPKK target whereas the C terminus<br />
is a MAPK target (Fig. 18.4).<br />
Although extensive progress has been made<br />
in identifying components of the PKA/MAPK signalling<br />
network, the signals perceived via these<br />
pathways, besides pheromones, are waiting to be<br />
uncovered. Promising c<strong>and</strong>idates for such signals<br />
are specific lipids <strong>and</strong> the pH of the environment,<br />
which were shown to stimulate this signalling network<br />
during filament formation (Klose et al. 2004;<br />
Martinez-Espinoza et al. 2004; see below).<br />
C. Signalling Network During<br />
Pathogenic Development<br />
In addition to their role in regulating mating <strong>and</strong><br />
morphogenesis, PKA <strong>and</strong> MAPK signalling are important<br />
determinants of pathogenic development.<br />
With the exception of the G protein β subunit<br />
Bpp1, all components of cAMP signalling identified<br />
to date are essential for pathogenicity (Garcia-<br />
Pedrajas et al. 2004; Müller et al. 2004). Mutants<br />
with different levels of perturbation of cAMP signalling<br />
arrest at specific points of the pathogenicity<br />
program. Filamentously growing mutant strains affectedinthecAMPpathway,suchasgpa3Δ,<br />
uac1Δ<br />
<strong>and</strong> adr1Δ, do not cause any disease symptoms<br />
(Gold et al. 1994; Regenfelder et al. 1997; Dürrenberger<br />
et al. 1998). Thus, the induction of filamentous<br />
growth through low PKA activity is not suffi-<br />
cient to trigger pathogenic development, stressing<br />
the need for an active bE/bW heterodimer during<br />
this process (see below).<br />
Mutants such as ubc1 R312Q , gpa3 Q206L or hgl1Δ<br />
which reflect increased PKA activity elicit the<br />
formation of tumours devoid of black teliospores<br />
(Krüger et al. 2000; Dürrenberger et al. 2001).<br />
Interestingly, gpa3 Q206L -expressing strains form<br />
abnormal tumours with shoot-like structures<br />
(Krüger et al. 2000). These results indicate that<br />
fungal development during growth in planta<br />
requires tightly regulated levels of PKA activity,<br />
<strong>and</strong> inadequate levels of PKA activity affect<br />
communication with the host during tumour<br />
differentiation.<br />
Given the fact that MAPK signalling is a central<br />
regulator for mating <strong>and</strong> morphogenesis, it<br />
was no surprise that mutants affected in MAPK<br />
signalling are affected also in pathogenicity.<br />
kpp4Δ <strong>and</strong> fuz7Δ strains are non-pathogenic<br />
(Banuett <strong>and</strong> Herskowitz 1994; Müller et al.<br />
2003b), whereas kpp2Δ mutants are reduced in<br />
virulence (Müller et al. 1999). This apparent<br />
discrepancy was resolved when a third MAP<br />
kinase, kpp6, was identified as bE/bW-regulated<br />
MAPK with partially overlapping functions to<br />
kpp2 (Fig. 18.2). kpp2Δ/kpp6Δ double mutants<br />
are non-pathogenic, supporting the notion that<br />
these two MAPKs exert important but redundant<br />
functions during pathogenic development<br />
(Brachmann et al. 2003). By expressing mutant<br />
versions of kpp2 <strong>and</strong> kpp6 which can no longer<br />
be activated by their corresponding MAPKK, it<br />
was furthermore demonstrated that Kpp2 is required<br />
for appressorium formation whereas Kpp6<br />
functions at a later stage during plant penetration<br />
(Brachmann et al. 2003). Given the finding that<br />
pheromones <strong>and</strong> receptors are dispensable for<br />
pathogenic development after cell fusion, the MAP<br />
kinase module, which transmits the pheromone<br />
signal, must be activated by different input signals<br />
during pathogenesis. It was recently shown that<br />
U. maydis cells respond to the presence of fatty<br />
acids or triglycerides by switching to filamentous<br />
growth. Since mutations in ras2, fuz7 <strong>and</strong> ubc3<br />
block this reaction (Klose et al. 2004), the MAP<br />
kinase module transmitting the pheromone signal<br />
must be required for this response. In addition, low<br />
pH signalling was also demonstrated to involve<br />
this module (Martinez-Espinoza et al. 2004). It will<br />
be a future challenge to determine whether these<br />
signals are indeed used in communication with<br />
the plant.