29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Latrunculin A (Lat-A) decreases ER motility, it is<br />

clearthatthe actincytoskeletonplays arole incortical<br />

ER dynamics <strong>and</strong> morphology in budding yeast<br />

(Prinz et al. 2000; Fehrenbacher et al. 2002). However,<br />

the precise function of the actin cytoskeleton<br />

in ER dynamics is not well understood.<br />

The dimorphic heterobasidiomycete U. maydis<br />

serves as an example of how the ER is organized<br />

in mycelial fungi. In U. maydis the ER forms<br />

a polygonal network of tubules that is associated<br />

with the cell cortex <strong>and</strong> makes contact with the<br />

nuclear envelope. As in S. cerevisiae (Prinz et al.<br />

2000), the ER in U. maydis is a highly dynamic<br />

structure, with ER tubules undergoing continuous<br />

extension, sliding, <strong>and</strong> fusion. Analysis of the effect<br />

of the destabilization of microtubules or mutations<br />

in microtubule-dependent motors revealed that ER<br />

motility in U. maydis requires microtubules <strong>and</strong> cytoplasmic<br />

dynein (Wedlich-Söldner et al. 2002a,b).<br />

Although microtubules support ER movement in U.<br />

maydis, as in vertebrate cells (Dabora <strong>and</strong> Sheetz<br />

1988), they are not required for peripheral organization<br />

of the network. However, in contrast to<br />

animal systems, motility events are not essential<br />

for ER inheritance in U. maydis; ERtubulesare<br />

present in the growing bud in cells with conditional<br />

mutations in tubulin at permissive <strong>and</strong> restrictive<br />

conditions (Wedlich-Söldner et al. 2002a).<br />

In S. cerevisiae, nuclear ER undergoes spindledriven<br />

inheritance in conjunction with the nucleus.<br />

By contrast, inheritance of cortical ER occurs by<br />

a fundamentally different, actin-dependent mechanism.<br />

Cortical ER is the first organelle inherited<br />

during the cell cycle (Preuss et al. 1991; Koning<br />

et al. 1996; Du et al. 2001). Moreover, cortical ER<br />

morphology is sensitive to treatment with Lat-A<br />

<strong>and</strong> to mutations in the actin-encoding ACT1 gene<br />

(Fehrenbacher et al. 2002). Using Sec63p-GFP to<br />

visualize cortical ER, Fehrenbacher et al. (2002)<br />

found that cortical ER is anchored to sites of bud<br />

emergence <strong>and</strong> apical bud growth during the S <strong>and</strong><br />

G2 phases of the cell cycle, <strong>and</strong> that this anchorage<br />

allows cortical ER to be drawn into <strong>and</strong> maintained<br />

in the bud as it develops. These observations support<br />

a mechanism for cortical ER inheritance that<br />

is actin cytoskeleton-dependent but relies on anchorage,<br />

not directed, organelle movement.<br />

In support of this model, a protein that localizes<br />

to the site of ER anchorage has been implicated<br />

in cortical ER inheritance. The exocyst componentSec3plocalizestothebudtipwhereitmediates<br />

post-Golgi membrane traffic (Walch-Solimena<br />

et al. 1997; Grote et al. 2000). Since sec3Δ cells ex-<br />

Organelle Inheritance in Fungi 29<br />

hibit a defect in cortical ER inheritance but not in<br />

Golgi <strong>and</strong> mitochondrial inheritance, it has been<br />

proposed that Sec3p contributes to anchoring cortical<br />

ER at the bud tip (Wiederkehr et al. 2003). In<br />

addition deletion of Aux1p/Swa2p, a protein that<br />

localizes to ER membranes but has no obvious role<br />

in membrane traffic, produces a delay in the transferofcorticalERtubulestodaughtercells(Galletal.<br />

2000; Pishvaee et al. 2000; Du et al. 2001). Therefore,<br />

it is possible that this protein also contributes<br />

to anchorage of ER at the bud tip.<br />

OtherstudiessupportaroleforatypeVmyosin<br />

in cortical ER inheritance. Deletion of the MYO4<br />

gene results in defects in actin cable-dependent<br />

movement of mRNAs from mother to daughter cells<br />

during cell division (Bertr<strong>and</strong> et al. 1998; Bohl et al.<br />

2000). The She2p/She3p protein complex serves as<br />

an adaptor to bind mRNA to a region in the Myo4p<br />

C-terminal tail (Bohl et al. 2000). Recent studies indicate<br />

that a point mutation in the ATP-binding region<br />

of the motor domain of Myo4p or a mutation of<br />

She3p inhibit ER inheritance (Estrada et al. 2003).<br />

Moreover, both She3p <strong>and</strong> Myo4p are recovered in<br />

fractions enriched in ER-derived membranes after<br />

subcellular fractionation. These findings raise<br />

the possibility that myosin may drive transport of<br />

cortical ER from mother to daughter cells in budding<br />

yeast. Thus, it is possible that two distinct<br />

processes, anchorage of ER in the bud tip <strong>and</strong> active<br />

transport of ER into the bud, may contribute to<br />

the inheritance of cortical ER. Alternatively, Myo4p<br />

<strong>and</strong> She3p may mediate the transport of ER anchoring<br />

proteins or mRNAs that encode ER anchoring<br />

proteins from mother to the bud tip.<br />

C. Vacuoles, the Lysosomes of Yeast<br />

Vacuoles are evenly distributed among mother<br />

<strong>and</strong> daughter cells in S. cerevisiae. Early studies<br />

indicated that the yeast vacuole fragments into<br />

small vesicles that are then distributed between<br />

the mother cell <strong>and</strong> the bud (Wiemken et al. 1970;<br />

Severs et al. 1976). However, more recent work<br />

indicates that vacuoles remain relatively constant<br />

in size during cell division, <strong>and</strong> that the primary<br />

event during vacuole inheritance is the formation<br />

of a tubular, vacuole-derived “segregation structure”<br />

(Weisman et al. 1987; Weisman <strong>and</strong> Wickner<br />

1988). The segregation structure forms near the<br />

bud <strong>and</strong> rapidly extends from the mother cell to<br />

the bud before the nucleus enters into the neck.<br />

Thereafter, the segregation structure disappears,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!