29.12.2012 Views

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

364 L.A. Casselton <strong>and</strong> M.P. Challen<br />

only between proteins encoded by different alleles<br />

of the genes. In any one mating in U. maydis (e.g.<br />

bW1-bE1×bW2-bE2), two functionally equivalent<br />

heterodimers form (bW1/bE2 <strong>and</strong> bW2/bE1;<br />

Kämper et al. 1995). The 5 ′ regions of the genes<br />

are highly variable, as is the promoter region,<br />

so a compatible gene combination cannot be<br />

generated by recombination. Such combinations<br />

can be made experimentally, <strong>and</strong> are sufficient<br />

without further mating to activate b-regulated<br />

development (Gillissen et al. 1992).<br />

In C. cinereus, we see the same pairs of<br />

HD1/HD2 genes, but the locus now extends over<br />

some 25 kb <strong>and</strong> contains representative members<br />

of three different pairs of genes (designated a, b<br />

<strong>and</strong> d), all of which are multiallelic (Kües et al.<br />

1992; Pardo et al. 1996). These three groups<br />

of genes have clearly arisen by duplication but<br />

are now functionally independent (i.e. they are<br />

paralogous). Mating partners are compatible<br />

provided they have different alleles of just one pair<br />

of genes. Because of the redundancy in function,<br />

it is common to find that few A loci contain all<br />

six genes – only one such locus was identified<br />

amongst nine investigated (Pardo et al. 1996). The<br />

A5 <strong>and</strong> A3 loci, for example, have only one gene of<br />

the d pair, A3 has the HD1 gene, <strong>and</strong> A5 has the<br />

HD2 gene; these encode compatible proteins that<br />

can heterodimerise in A3 × A5matings.Thereare<br />

inactive pseudogenes in some loci; the first locus<br />

sequenced, A42, contained an additional HD1<br />

gene which was thought to represent a c gene pair<br />

(Kües et al. 1992) – hence, the designation d for<br />

the third gene pair! If mating partners contained<br />

different alleles of all three gene pairs, six different<br />

but functionally equivalent heterodimers would be<br />

formed. Locus organisation is maintained because<br />

the DNA sequences that comprise allelic versions<br />

of the genes (both coding <strong>and</strong> flanking sequence)<br />

are sufficiently different to prevent homologous<br />

recombination between alleles <strong>and</strong>, thus, bring<br />

compatible combinations of genes together.<br />

During evolution of this complex, there has been<br />

r<strong>and</strong>om mixing of the three groups of genes<br />

to generate many different allele combinations<br />

(May <strong>and</strong> Matzke 1995; Pardo et al. 1996). Large<br />

numbers of A mating specificities can be generated<br />

by having relatively few alleles of the three groups<br />

of genes. A population analysis of the C. cinereus<br />

A locus identified four alleles of the a genes, ten<br />

of the b genes <strong>and</strong> three of the d genes, sufficient<br />

to generate 120 genetically different A loci (May<br />

<strong>and</strong> Matzke 1995). Recombination between the<br />

different groups of genes at the C. cinereus A locus<br />

can still occur with a frequency of 0.07% (Day 1960,<br />

1963b), which is due to a short 7.0-kb sequence<br />

of homology that exists between the a <strong>and</strong> the b<br />

gene pairs in all versions of the A locus (Kües et al.<br />

1992; May <strong>and</strong> Matzke 1995). Recombination has<br />

the beneficial effect of generating non-parental<br />

A mating specificities but the disadvantage that<br />

these are fully compatible with all other sibs<br />

from the mating. Increasing sib-compatibility<br />

reduces the efficiency of an outbreeding system, so<br />

evolutionary pressure will have acted to maintain<br />

close linkage of the gene pairs. The a gene pair<br />

in the C. cinereus locus corresponds to the Aα<br />

locus (hence, α-complex in Fig. 17.4), <strong>and</strong> the b<br />

<strong>and</strong> d genes to the Aβ locus (hence, β-complex<br />

in Fig. 17.4) described by Day (1960, 1963b).<br />

In S. commune, where recombination between<br />

A genes was first described (see Raper 1966),<br />

the two groups of genes are separated at much<br />

greater distance (1-17cM), depending on the<br />

strains (Raper et al. 1960), <strong>and</strong> the Aα <strong>and</strong> Aβ<br />

genes clearly reside at two distinct loci. The Aα<br />

locus contains a single pair of HD1/HD2 genes for<br />

which there are nine alleles (Stankis et al. 1992).<br />

Asyet,onlyasinglegeneoftheAβ complex has<br />

been identified (Shen et al. 1996) but there are<br />

apredicted32Aβ specificities (Raper 1966), <strong>and</strong> it<br />

is likely that at least two pairs of genes would be<br />

needed to generate this number.<br />

2. Homeodomain Protein Interactions<br />

An important property of the homeodomain proteins<br />

encoded by the HD1 <strong>and</strong> HD2 genes is their<br />

ability to discriminate between large numbers of<br />

potential dimerisation partners. With 25 alleles of<br />

the b genes of U. maydis, we can calculate that there<br />

are potentially 625 heterodimer interactions; 25<br />

are self-interactions that are incompatible whereas<br />

the remaining 600 are predicted to be possible<br />

<strong>and</strong> all equally capable of activating b-regulated<br />

development. In C. cinereus, there are many<br />

more incompatible interactions because proteins<br />

encoded by paralogous genes are also unable to<br />

heterodimerise (Pardo et al. 1996). Studies with U.<br />

maydis bproteins<strong>and</strong>C. cinereus <strong>and</strong> S. commune<br />

A proteins have shown that specificity resides in<br />

the N-terminal domains; exchanges between these<br />

domains generated altered specificities, <strong>and</strong> these<br />

domains are sufficient to mediate protein–protein<br />

dimerisation in vitro (Banham et al. 1995; Kämper<br />

et al. 1995; Magae et al. 1995). The N-terminal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!